Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Council Bans Staff From Calling Married Couples Husband and Wife in Case it Causes Offence to They/T... Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:00 | Toby Young
The Royal Borough of Greenwich has banned staff from using the terms 'husband' and 'wife' in case it offends gender non-conforming couples.
The post Council Bans Staff From Calling Married Couples Husband and Wife in Case it Causes Offence to They/Thems appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Journalists Need to Come Clean About Payments They Receive From Big Pharma Tue Aug 19, 2025 09:40 | Dr Alan Black
If medical journalists want to be trusted, they?ll need to come clean about Big Pharma payouts instead of hiding behind glossy awards and vague disclosures, says Dr Alan Black.
The post Journalists Need to Come Clean About Payments They Receive From Big Pharma appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Once the Public Begin to Realise What Rehoming Immigrants in HMOs Really Means, They?ll be Rioting t... Tue Aug 19, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker
Closing asylum hotels and housing illegal migrants in HMOs won't quell public anger about the current level of illegal migration. On the contrary, it will just make things worse, warns Steven Tucker.
The post Once the Public Begin to Realise What Rehoming Immigrants in HMOs Really Means, They?ll be Rioting to Re-Open the Hotels Again! appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Aug 19, 2025 00:27 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Workers Tear Down St George?s Cross on Orders of Council That Prided Itself on Palestinian Banners a... Mon Aug 18, 2025 19:00 | Richard Eldred
Tower Hamlets council is ripping down St George's flags, fuelling fury over double standards on Palestinian flags and turning Britain's streets into the front line of a flag war.
The post Workers Tear Down St George?s Cross on Orders of Council That Prided Itself on Palestinian Banners as Flag Wars Spread Across Britain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
international |
gender and sexuality |
other press
Thursday July 22, 2010 13:26
by Clara Zetkin
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (11 of 11)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Where in the koran does it say women have to wear this kind of garment? It only says that women should show modesty in their dress. The niqab is a tool for the oppression and domination of women by men. Have some women come to accept their oppression so thoroughly that they even choose to oppress themselves??
If you really must, you can honour your god and, according to the koran, still dress more or less as you please, just show a little modesty. No need for any woman to ever wear the niqab.
So if they are allowed cover there faces in public, should all people then have the right to sport a Balaclava in public?
Are not the burqa wearers an oppressed minority within an oppressed minority? Islam is also a form of oppression.
Are you sure that the 2004 law was specifically aimed at stopping Muslim girls from wearing the hijab in state schools?I thought it was against all "ostentatious" signs of religion including the Jewish skull cap and the Christian crucifix.I have heard stories of French teachers asking students to put away their Christian crosses or to go home!Unthinkable in Mother Ireland
Incredibly only 16 Muslim girls turned up in September ,after the ban,to sate schools!All 16 then got classes at home provided by the state as far as I know.
http://liammacuaid.wordpress.com/2010/05/30/tu-te-tromp...liam/
http://liammacuaid.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/banning-the...cism/
Discussion articles on wearing of veil/nijab etc
Forcing women to cover up every piece of their bodies in public has nothing to do with womens' rights either I suppose?
Macho males take off the veils of their female slaves in the bedroom.
Peter Manson replies to left and right criticisms of his article above. You may access the critical letters at: http://www.cpgb.org.uk/letters.php?issue_id=828
The full text of Peters response is at the url below.
The publication in last week’s Weekly Worker of three letters, whose authors - Andrew Coates, Robert Wilkinson and Jacob Richter - share the anti-religious intolerance of much of the French left, was useful. It helped to reveal a mindset of what is, at the end of the day, a profoundly anti-democratic viewpoint that can only serve to reinforce divisions amongst the working class.
In response to my article, ‘French burqa ban has nothing to do with women’s rights’ (July 22), Andrew Coates states: “The defence of the burqa is part of a general trend to assert special, privileged protection for religious claims. It is root and branch against any form of equality. The assertion of religious rights, of which the ‘right’ to wear the burqa is just one, should be opposed,not embraced” (Letters, July 29).
In the same edition, ‘official’ communist Robert Wilkinson writes: “La laïcité [secularism] is a struggle against the separatism and privilege of any religion and a recognition that the ‘freedom’ of a few fanatical believers renders immense assistance to the far right in their demonisation of all Muslims.” Comrade Wilkinson does not say which ‘freedoms’ he would like to see ‘derecognised’, but, since the issue under discussion was the French legal ban on the right to wear the burqa and niqab, we can only assume that this is what he is referring to.
They are joined by Jacob Richter, who is the most blunt: “... the public display of religious symbols needs to be curtailed, whether they come in the form of saintly statues or burqas.”
What a load of..........
Nobody in Europe minds women on the San Tropez beach walking around topless in skimpy bikinis.
Swedish beaches are full of nude people.
Irishmen used to race horses along the beaches of County Clare completely nude up to the 19th Century.
Only Muslims seem to have a problem with Nudes.
Forgot to add the link for Peters response:
Some more correspondence.
Women love their faces.
That is why female face make-up is so popular around the world.
Only slave-driving men force women to cover up their beautiful faces.
Oppression.
Pure and simple.