Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
DOGE U.K. ? and Other Hopes and Dreams for 2025 Wed Jan 01, 2025 13:07 | Charlotte Gill
What are your hope and dreams for 2025? Top of Charlotte Gill's list is a DOGE U.K. to bring Elon Musk's war on public sector waste to this country ? and she's already started putting one together.
The post DOGE U.K. ? and Other Hopes and Dreams for 2025 appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
New Hate Crime Laws in Ireland Came Into Force on December 31st Wed Jan 01, 2025 11:00 | Dr Frederick Attenborough
A new hate crime law came into effect in Ireland yesterday. In spite of the worst clauses in the hate crime bill being stripped out, it's still a dark day for free speech in Ireland, says Frederick Attenborough.
The post New Hate Crime Laws in Ireland Came Into Force on December 31st appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Declined: Chapter Two Wed Jan 01, 2025 09:00 | M. Zermansky
Chapter two of Declined ? a dystopian satire about the emergence of a social credit system in the U.K., serialised in?the Daily Sceptic ? is here. This week: even the supermarkets are clamping down on "Non-Efficients".
The post Declined: Chapter Two appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Oxford?s Continued Descent into Green Hell Wed Jan 01, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
Oxfordshire's green lunatics are at it again, says Ben Pile. Councils which you would think had enough on their plate trying to stop drug and rape gangs are instead spending taxpayers' money on sucking CO2 out of the air.
The post Oxford’s Continued Descent into Green Hell appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Wed Jan 01, 2025 00:34 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en
Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en
Voltaire Network >>
international |
gender and sexuality |
other press
Thursday July 22, 2010 13:26
by Clara Zetkin
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (11 of 11)
Jump To Comment: 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1Women love their faces.
That is why female face make-up is so popular around the world.
Only slave-driving men force women to cover up their beautiful faces.
Oppression.
Pure and simple.
Some more correspondence.
Forgot to add the link for Peters response:
What a load of..........
Nobody in Europe minds women on the San Tropez beach walking around topless in skimpy bikinis.
Swedish beaches are full of nude people.
Irishmen used to race horses along the beaches of County Clare completely nude up to the 19th Century.
Only Muslims seem to have a problem with Nudes.
Peter Manson replies to left and right criticisms of his article above. You may access the critical letters at: http://www.cpgb.org.uk/letters.php?issue_id=828
The full text of Peters response is at the url below.
The publication in last week’s Weekly Worker of three letters, whose authors - Andrew Coates, Robert Wilkinson and Jacob Richter - share the anti-religious intolerance of much of the French left, was useful. It helped to reveal a mindset of what is, at the end of the day, a profoundly anti-democratic viewpoint that can only serve to reinforce divisions amongst the working class.
In response to my article, ‘French burqa ban has nothing to do with women’s rights’ (July 22), Andrew Coates states: “The defence of the burqa is part of a general trend to assert special, privileged protection for religious claims. It is root and branch against any form of equality. The assertion of religious rights, of which the ‘right’ to wear the burqa is just one, should be opposed,not embraced” (Letters, July 29).
In the same edition, ‘official’ communist Robert Wilkinson writes: “La laïcité [secularism] is a struggle against the separatism and privilege of any religion and a recognition that the ‘freedom’ of a few fanatical believers renders immense assistance to the far right in their demonisation of all Muslims.” Comrade Wilkinson does not say which ‘freedoms’ he would like to see ‘derecognised’, but, since the issue under discussion was the French legal ban on the right to wear the burqa and niqab, we can only assume that this is what he is referring to.
They are joined by Jacob Richter, who is the most blunt: “... the public display of religious symbols needs to be curtailed, whether they come in the form of saintly statues or burqas.”
Forcing women to cover up every piece of their bodies in public has nothing to do with womens' rights either I suppose?
Macho males take off the veils of their female slaves in the bedroom.
http://liammacuaid.wordpress.com/2010/05/30/tu-te-tromp...liam/
http://liammacuaid.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/banning-the...cism/
Discussion articles on wearing of veil/nijab etc
Are you sure that the 2004 law was specifically aimed at stopping Muslim girls from wearing the hijab in state schools?I thought it was against all "ostentatious" signs of religion including the Jewish skull cap and the Christian crucifix.I have heard stories of French teachers asking students to put away their Christian crosses or to go home!Unthinkable in Mother Ireland
Incredibly only 16 Muslim girls turned up in September ,after the ban,to sate schools!All 16 then got classes at home provided by the state as far as I know.
Are not the burqa wearers an oppressed minority within an oppressed minority? Islam is also a form of oppression.
So if they are allowed cover there faces in public, should all people then have the right to sport a Balaclava in public?
Where in the koran does it say women have to wear this kind of garment? It only says that women should show modesty in their dress. The niqab is a tool for the oppression and domination of women by men. Have some women come to accept their oppression so thoroughly that they even choose to oppress themselves??
If you really must, you can honour your god and, according to the koran, still dress more or less as you please, just show a little modesty. No need for any woman to ever wear the niqab.