New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech Sat Jul 27, 2024 19:00 | Sean Walsh
The sweeping House of Commons reforms proposed by Green MP Ellie Chowns are evidence that the Mrs Dutt-Pauker types have moved from Peter Simple's columns into public life. We're in for a bumpy ride, says Sean Walsh.
The post Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills Sat Jul 27, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
With heat pump numbers forecast to rise, the energy watchdog Ofgem has predicted that bills for those who continue using gas boilers will surge.
The post Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies Sat Jul 27, 2024 15:00 | David Turver
So much for Labour's pledge to cut energy bills by £300, says David Turver. Under GB Energy, our bills can only go one way, and that is up.
The post Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? Sat Jul 27, 2024 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Awful audio, bizarre performances, embarrassing gaffes and a woke 'Last Supper' parody that has outraged Christians turned the Paris Olympics opening ceremony into a rain-soaked disaster.
The post Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams... Sat Jul 27, 2024 11:46 | Steven Tucker
The Muslim Vote wants Labour to abolish Victorian ?spiritual influence? laws that prevent religious leaders from swaying voters, but Steven Tucker argues that in cities like Leicester these laws are more vital than ever.
The post Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams Doing the Same appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Islamophobia: no! Free Speech: Yes

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | other press author Sunday February 19, 2006 22:02author by hs Report this post to the editors

Peter Manson analyses the furore over the Danish cartoon controversy

This whole episode started in what appeared to be a harmless way. Danish author Kåre Bluitgen wanted to write a children’s book on the life of Mohammed, but was unable to find an artist prepared to illustrate it for him (ironically the book has since been published, complete with illustrations, although the artist insisted on anonymity). The editors of Jyllands-Posten claim they decided to test out this unwillingness to depict the prophet by asking 25 cartoonists to send then an image of Mohammed “as they saw him”. Thirteen refused, but the other 12 were all published in the newspaper. There seems little doubt that the exercise was intended as a provocation.

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/612/cartoons.htm

author by Cliffpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:51author address author phone Report this post to the editors

If you are an atheist like me who has no religious beliefs whatsoever then you are an Islamophobe in a Muslim's eyes - I don't like Islam - I think its completely barmy and I don't have to apologise for that and least of all to a hysterical mob.

author by brave boypublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

perhaps you have some rivetting personal accounts to share on how you faced down a lynching?

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

free speech means having the right to caricature the so called prophet.

do people think that the life of brian should be banned? after all that ofends alot of christians. but then they dont go and riot and burn down embassies.

muhammed was a terrorist and an imperialist who spread his invented religion by conquering other countries. so the caricature of him with a bomb in his turban is appropriate.

christinity should be mocked.

islam should be mocked.

all religions are invented.

all religions should be mocked.

NO gods!

NO masters!

author by grrrrrrrrrrrrrrpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

our chief weapons are :-
ruthlessness
surprise
a fanatical devotion to the pope
a-----

ningú espereix el inquisició espanyol
ningú espereix el inquisició espanyol

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

now try and parody 3 islamic sheiks like taht and in 3 sheiks of a lambs tail you'll have muslim mobs burning down indy centres.

author by Agent Provocateurpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 13:41author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Pat C

Free speech means the right to ridicule and mock people, right?

NO DOGS

NO BLACKS

NO IRISH

NO QUEERS

Is this what you mean? Free speech without responsibility or consideration? If you want to be free to stereotype and ridicule millions of people in your superficial way, then you should have no problem about some Muslim attitudes to gay people. You are as intolerant as anything you object to. Also your posts are becoming tediously repetitive. Dominating the comments on Indymedia is more than a little self-important - and very offputting for people who might like to hear what somebody else has to say for a change. Or are we now PatC.ie rather than Indymedia.ie?

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 13:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

you are well named.

islam discriminates against women and gays, that is why i criticiseit. it also wants to control what can be published in the press, that is why i criticise.

islam considers women and gays to be worth the same as dogs.

. "Also your posts are becoming tediously repetitive. "

so are the posts in favour of islam having the right to censor the press. when they stop, i'll stop.

"Dominating the comments on Indymedia is more than a little self-important - "

not at all, in democratic debate its known as the right to reply. something that islamophiles dont believe in.

"and very offputting for people who might like to hear what somebody else has to say for a change."

nobody is stopped from replying on indymedia, provided you dont get abusive. you have been deleted in the past for your lies and abuse. your comment above is borderline.

criticising religion is not abuse.

pointing out that the so-called polygmous pedophileprophet muhammed was a terrorist and imperialist is merely pointing out historical fact.

still waiting to hear if you want to ban the life of brian.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:04author address author phone Report this post to the editors

i wonder what my critics have ever done to fight racism? i am prepared to confront racists by any means necessary and have done so.

what i wont do is surrender to islam. islam is just as evil as catholicism. more evil actually, you wont find very many catholics who believe that gays or adulterouswomen should be stoned to death. yet those beliefs are part of mainstream islamic belief. wherever the mullahs get into power they impose the sharia.

heres a piece from tom paine, its as relevant today as it ever was.

"All national institutions of churchs whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolise power and profit"

Tom Paine
The Age of Reason, 1793.

author by eeekkkkkkpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:41author address author phone Report this post to the editors

He's good at it too.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

you are the troll.

i'll continue to stand up for democratic rights, for womens rights, for gay rights.

you can continue to lick the boots of the mullahs who would enslave us all.

No gods!

No masters!

author by Agent Provacateurpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Gays discriminate against women.

Women discriminate against gays.

Communists can be murderers, as can anarchists, catholics, jews, buddhists, muslims etc etc. Those parts of the muslim faith that are oppressive deserve to be discredited and exposed - rationally. The rest of it should not be lumped in with that. The greater part of what muslims believe is actually peaceful and constructive - a point which you ought to respect if you are genuine about being fair. It is a system of belief - good and bad - just like your own. You preach crude hatred - bordering on voilent - as dangerous as anything you have ever objected to on your own account. I strongly object to your commentary as profoundly racist and offensive. The problem with strident, self-righteous people like you is that you imagine your own subjective opinions are the same thing as absolute truth. You continue to make an embarassing spectacle of yourself with this ranting. And posting several comments to everyone else's one is utterly selfish. Repetition wont validate your opinion or make it any more convincing to the rest of us - the opposite in fact.

author by eeekkkkpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:51author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I just don't ascribe 'evil' over and over to whole religions for a cheap row on the internet.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

what you post is simple but not truth.

"Gays discriminate against women."

individuals may but not as a group.

"Women discriminate against gays."

individuals may but not as a group.

islam as areligion discriminates against women and gays.

"Those parts of the muslim faith that are oppressive deserve to be discredited and exposed - rationally. "

agreed.

"The rest of it should not be lumped in with that."

i#ll stop lumping it in together whenthe liberal muslims split from the fanatics.

"The greater part of what muslims believe is actually peaceful and constructive - a point which you ought to respect if you are genuine about being fair. "

its not its an evil litany thatdominates all aspects of life.

" You preach crude hatred - bordering on voilent - as dangerous as anything you have ever objected to on your own account. "

i dont preach hatred/ i preach fight back against islamofascists.

"I strongly object to your commentary as profoundly racist and offensive. "

religion is not race. how could it be racist to criticise religion? am i racist if i criticise christianity?

come out from behind your mask and say that to my face! but you wouldnt, you islamophile coward!

"Repetition wont validate your opinion or make it any more convincing to the rest of us - the opposite in fact. "

same goes for you and eek etc.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 14:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

you have decided that defending islam is more important than gay and womens rights.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 15:31author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Heres a piece from a WSM article on Islam. I guess some will think that this is racist as well.

"Islam in general believes that no "division between matters social, political and religious should exist." The idea of Islamic government and Islamic law is not something confined to what is called 'Islamic fundamentalism' but is an expected belief of all Muslims. Under Shari'a (Islamic) law the penalty for Apostasy (Muslims who reject Islam, for instance they "might state that the universe has always existed from eternity"), is execution for men and life imprisonment for women. So, if anything, Islam today attempts to maintain a much tighter control of the thoughts in people's heads than Christianity has done since the time of Galileo.

Islam insists that the Quran is almost entirely a document dictated by God to Muhammad. Like most 'holy books' it is full of absurdities and cruelties which are well documented on the web by Muslim apostates. For instance in Quran 5:33 God commands "The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land." God also dictates that women are second class citizens, in Quran 4:34 he dictates "Men are in charge of women, because Allah has made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah has guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion andmonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.""

How dare they write such things about Islam! The fact that its true makes it more racist!

author by Cliffpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 18:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It means that everyone no matter who they are is entitled to their opinion/
I despise homophobes - but that does not mean I should be entitled to prevent homophobes from insulting gays.
I despise nazis- but that does not mean I should stop David Irving from denying the holocaust.
I despise Islamic fundementalists - but that does not mean I should stop them from preaching hate.

what I can do is stop homphobes from physically attacking gay.
I can stop David Irving from physically attacking Jews.
And I can go to war with Islamic fundementalists who blow up buses full of Jews, demolish skyscrapers with hijacked airliners and bomb their terrorist training camps.

author by pat cpublication date Mon Feb 20, 2006 19:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

any chance of the islamophiles condemning this? i wont hold my breath.

***************************************

Nigerian Muslim protestors burn churches, kill priest

Lagos, Nigeria, 02/20 - At least one Catholic priest was killed and several churches set ablaze Saturday during a protest by Muslims in two predominantly-Muslim Nigerian states over the cartoons of the prophet Mohamed, the local press reported.

Unconfirmed reports said the death toll from the protests in the northern Borno and Katsina states had risen from three to over a dozen.

The private Guardian newspaper quoted a spokesman for the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Rev. Fr. George Ehusani, as saying that Rev. Fr. Michael of the Maiduguri Diocese was burnt in his apartment while the residence of the Bishop of the Diocese was set on fire.

Related Link: http://www.angolapress-angop.ao/noticia-e.asp?ID=418282
author by james - workshy socialite partypublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 01:17author address author phone Report this post to the editors

i see agent p. got tired of debating pat c. after a brief exchange doesn't take long to realise he does'nt listen to anyone does it?

author by Dr.Nightdubpublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 02:00author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Number 2 is partially just guess work on my part Pat, but from your perspective:

1. Nigerian Muslims burn churches, kill priest = bad.
2. Spanish anarchists burn churches, kill priests = good?
3. German Nazis burn synagogues, kill rabbis = bad.
4. Libyan soldiers prevent burning of embassy, kill "mullahs' lackeys" = good.

If all religion is evil from your point of view, particularly the ones that discriminate against women and gays (like there's another kind?), then why differentiate?

For example: "Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, and Christ also is the head of the assembly, being himself the savior of the body. But as the assembly is subject to Christ, so let the wives also be to their own husbands in everything." - quote by St.Paul, one of the early Christians' top boys. Hardly a charter for equality, is it?

If you were being consistent in your opposition to discrimination, you actually ought to rejoice that a Catholic priest has gone off to meet the great misogynist in the sky.

So how come it's just Islam that seems to draw down the wrath of Pat? Answer that one and then maybe we'll get around to the subject of gay Muslims.

author by Danish Pastrypublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 02:38author email danishpastry at graffiti dot netauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

If Indymedia Ireland can publish pictures of the Pope in Nazi uniform and pictures of Michael McDowell in Nazi uniform, we - catholics, jews, muslims, proddies, and the rest accept that as freedom of speech. But if we see a picture of a so-called paedophile prophet people are murdered and that's acceptable because their sensibiltiies were offended? What utter bollox.

08_1_b.jpg

00447.gif

Stone me, a cartoonist!
Stone me, a cartoonist!

author by pat cpublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

it is a pleasure to debate with you.

afaiaa the nigerian priest wasnt hurting anyone, yet he was burned alive by islamic fundamentalists.

the spanish priests had actively suppressed the people, in some cases they even led fasccist groups, thats why they were dealt with.

i dont think it is rational however to compare the killing of rabbis by thenazis to the killing of islamic fundamentalists by libyan troops. i dont believe the rabbis were harming anyone and i'm sure that you dont think so either.

the attack on the embassy by the fundiesin libya is part of an ongoing campaign to overthrow the gadaffi regime ( i wouldnt mind if this was by democrats, but these guys want to bring in a theocratic state).

"If all religion is evil from your point of view, particularly the ones that discriminate against women and gays (like there's another kind?), then why differentiate?

"For example: "Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, and Christ also is the head of the assembly, being himself the savior of the body. But as the assembly is subject to Christ, so let the wives also be to their own husbands in everything." - quote by St.Paul, one of the early Christians' top boys. Hardly a charter for equality, is it? "

i agree. and i also condemn christianity. i have done so throughout this debate.

"If you were being consistent in your opposition to discrimination, you actually ought to rejoice that a Catholic priest has gone off to meet the great misogynist in the sky. "

no, because he wasnt actively doing anything to harm anyone. if he was leader of a rightwingmilitia, i would rejoice.

"So how come it's just Islam that seems to draw down the wrath of Pat?"

it isnt. i condemn catholicism.

the vatican is responsible for countlessdeaths due to its ban on condoms.

i have an introduction to another article in other press where i list 5 other religions as well as islam that act in nutty ways regarding health.
"The Hidden Dangers of Fundamentalism" is at the link below.

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/74275

author by pat cpublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

good stuff! please supply more.

but you forgot something.. danish pastries are now called roses of the (so called) prophet muhammed!

author by pat cpublication date Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:20author address author phone Report this post to the editors

i presume from your comments that you support the muslim mob who burned the priest to death. its interesting that none of the islamophiles can find it within themselves to utter even a single word of regret at this man being burned alive. yet they get quite exercised about a couple of cartoons or at any criticism of islam.

a bunch of hypocrites.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy