Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Michael ?Hockey Stick? Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000 Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:00 | Richard Eldred Michael Mann, infamous for his climate "hockey stick" graph, has been ordered to pay over $530,000 in legal fees after spending over a decade trying ? and failing ? to silence National Review through a lawsuit.
The post Michael ?Hockey Stick? Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000 appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
NHS?s Tech ?Efficiency? Adds Layers of Inefficiency and Pain Sun Jan 12, 2025 09:00 | Shane McEvoy In an age where technology promises efficiency, Shane McEvoy's recent encounter with an NHS booking service chatbot paints a very different picture of inefficiency and frustration that is symptomatic of deeper issues.
The post NHS’s Tech ‘Efficiency’ Adds Layers of Inefficiency and Pain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Cooking the Books: Why You Just Can?t Trust the Annual Bestseller Lists Anymore Sun Jan 12, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker The New York Times Bestseller list is "pure propaganda", says Elon Musk. The newspaper even admitted in court it is "editorial content", not factual. But what about the Sunday Times version? Steven Tucker investigates.
The post Cooking the Books: Why You Just Can’t Trust the Annual Bestseller Lists Anymore appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sun Jan 12, 2025 01:23 | Will Jones A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political Sat Jan 11, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl Science, nominally the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, is at it again. In November, they published an editorial saying that scientists need to be even more political than they already are.
The post Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Feminism - Challenging our preconceptions!
Ógra Shinn Féin will be taking to the streets and countryside this weekend, (29 June - 1 July) bringing A.R.I.S.E to an end as their National Campaign by holding a nation wide Weekend of Action on the issue of Feminism.
Here an article taken from the 'Ógra Shinn Féin Handbook' discusses the issue and importance of Feminism to Irish Republicans:
I’m not a feminist, but …”! This phrase is heard all too frequently from progressives and, sadly, republicans are no exception. Many young people have come to view feminism as at best outmoded and unnecessary, at worst “anti-male”. This is no accident – for as long as feminism has existed, its opponents have tried to portray it in these terms. It’s important to remember that those opponents are, by and large, the same people who oppose equality for ethnic minorities and the working class.
So let’s look at what feminism is. Its most basic definition, found in any dictionary, is the belief in equality of the sexes. What republican could disagree with that? It’s written into the 1916 Proclamation and the Democratic Programme of the First Dáil. Connolly, Pearse and MacDonagh all explicitly advocated equal rights for women. And, of course, republican women such as Constance Markievicz and Hannah Sheehy-Skeffington openly aligned themselves with the cause of gender equality. The men and women of 1916 recognised that the Republic’s guarantee of “equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens” meant little if it excluded 50% of the population. That’s as true today as it was then – and despite undeniable advances in recent years, this goal has yet to be achieved.
Just as important is the question of what feminism isn't. It isn't a set of rules governing how women should dress, the words we should use or our romantic and sexual relationships. Feminists can and do disagree on a variety of issues - including the origin of patriarchy, the use of quotas to combat discrimination, and pornography/sex work. The media tend to single out women with the most extreme positions on these issues and portray them as representative of all feminists. Ask yourself whose agenda this serves.
So if the goal is equality for everyone, why the need for the term “feminist”? Two reasons. First, because it’s important to keep the issue of gender equality to the forefront of the equality agenda. It’s the oldest form of discrimination after all - and often the most easily overlooked. And second, because downplaying the importance of feminism ultimately feeds into a reactionary agenda which actively opposes equality.
Republicanism is indivisible from feminism just as it is indivisible from socialism, anti-racism and anti-sectarianism. Republicans would not hesitate to describe ourselves in those terms - neither should we hesitate to call ourselves feminists.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (37 of 37)