The Enemy Without

international | arts and media | other press

Saturday June 23, 2007 10:18

by David Manning & Miriam Cotton - MediaBite

editors at mediabite dot org

The 'bought priesthood' strikes again

Free elections were held in Palestine in 2006 and the Hamas party were the Palestinian electorate's choice for government. The message was clear: if the UN, US, and Israel were to have any chance of negotiating a constructive outcome in the region, Hamas would have to be taken seriously. In a landslide victory, they had incontrovertibly become the legitimately elected voice of the Palestinian people.

But that is not what has happened. Palestine made the 'wrong' choice and mainstream media coverage has upended itself in its efforts to support the US's punishment of the Palestinians for not throwing up the 'right' result. Never mind that the ousted opposition party was both corrupt and incompetent. MediaBite's latest media shot examines the breathtaking media hypocrisy which has eviscerated the meaning of the term 'democracy' to help disguise what the US and Israel have done to destroy Palestine's legitimate democracy - a democracy that was more democratic than the US's own:

"The [day following the election] the Irish Times' Roula Khalaf and William Wallis wrote, as if to pre-empt Washington's ironic but inevitable dissatisfaction, to suggest a re-think on the behalf of the great democrats: 'Faced with these results", they said, "some Arab governments, and even liberal intellectuals, have been arguing that the US should now reconsider its approach to democracy in the Arab world.' "

The 'lberal intellectuals' have been dilligent in their work. Chillingly, The New York Times recently reported:

"Since the election victory of Hamas in January 2006, the United States and Israel have worked to isolate and damage Hamas and build up Fatah with recognition and weaponry." .

What this refers to is of course is the death and illness of many Palestinian people and the destruction of their society and infrastructure - culminating in civil war which now sees the democratically rejected and corrput Fatah party regaining control of parts of the territory - to the delight and relief of their US and Israeli sponsors. It could scarcely have been thought that life for the Palestinians could be made worse than it already was but that turns out not to be right. Their plight must now rank among the worst - if not the worst - of any oppressed group of people in the world.

Things are going well.

And the wiser heads who have chronicled these events from the west have made their own unique contribution to the accompanying media discourse as the murderous farce unfolded. The uncomfortable truth was made comfortable and it was accomplished very easily: committing genocide on defenceless people is now to be described as 'bringing democracy'. And so the intellectuals, the solemn faced-news presenters, pundits and reporters all get to sleep easily at night in places like Dublin and New York.

Link to media shot

http://www.mediabite.org/article_The-Enemy-Without--nda....html

save preference

Comments (13 of 13)

Landslide?

by Dorothy Gale

Sat Jun 23, 2007 18:50

"In a landslide victory, they had incontrovertibly become the legitimately elected voice of the Palestinian people."

Hamas did not win a landslide victory. They got 42% of the votes cast. This gave them a majority in parliament but not a mandate to create an islamic state. Fatah, the PFLP & DFLP got more than 50% of the vote between them.Secular parties got 55% of the vote in total.

'A landslide victory'

by David Manning - MediaBite

Sat Jun 23, 2007 20:54

The term 'landslide' is taken directly from an Irish Times report the day after the results were announced. The full quote was - “a spectacular landslide victory”. You can find it in the MediaShot this introduction links to.

http://www.mediabite.org/article_The-Enemy-Without--nda....html

The BBC reported a day earlier: "Hamas sweeps to election victory"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4650788.stm

"Hamas won the election, with 74 seats to the ruling-Fatah's 45, providing Hamas with the majority of seats and the ability to form a majority government on their own. "Hamas won 44 percent of the popular vote but 56 percent of the seats, while Fatah won 42 percent of the popular vote but only 34 percent of the seats" according to the New York Times [1]."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_legislative_el..._2006

Hamas won 76 of 132 seats

by Miriam Cotton

Sun Jun 24, 2007 07:30

A report from Green Left on 1 Feb 2006 sums up the reason for the victory - two brief excerpts here - full report at link below

"PALESTINE: Hamas wins election

Kim Bullimore

In a stunning victory, the Islamic Palestinian resistance group Hamas claimed 76 of the 132 seats in the second Palestinian Authority (PA) election on January 25. This was the first election for the Palestinian Legislative Assembly held in almost 10 years. Hamas decisively defeated the ruling Fatah party, which retained 43 seats. Hamas, which campaigned against corruption and for improved social services, was expected to do well in the election, but not to gain enough seats to take control of the PA in its own right. "

The election result was a direct message of defiance from the Palestinian people to the US and Israel. As Bullmore puts it later in the report:

"The continuing brutal military occupation of Palestine by Israel also contributed to the Hamas victory. Fatah’s inability to deliver promises of statehood and peace in the wake of the failed Oslo “peace” process has caused a decline in Fatah’s support. Oslo and subsequent “peace processes” strengthened the brutal 39-year-old Israeli occupation and led to an abysmal deterioration in Palestinian living conditions. In addition, even more land has been confiscated by Israel for the building of illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and Israel has continued to pursue its construction of the illegal apartheid wall. "

[Kim Bullimore is a member of the Socialist Alliance and lived in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 2004, where she worked with the human-rights organisation International Women’s Peace Service. .]

http://www.greenleft.org.au/2006/654/7554

Jewish Voice for Peace

Sun Jun 24, 2007 07:36

An even handed assessment of Hamas from Jewish Voice for Peace:

http://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/publish/article_292....ml#q1

allow me to share some of my expertise with you

by computer expert

Sun Jun 24, 2007 15:47

Go to the site you want to link to .Put the cursor arrow on the address (http.www.etc)of the site you want to link to- left click with your mouse ;the address will turn blue. Then go to ‘edit’ on the top bar ,click -a list will appear. On the list click on the word ‘copy’. Return to the comment you want the link to appear on . Go to edit again . Now click on the word ‘paste’. The link will appear .

Hope that helps .It took me about three years to work it out

Corrupting the Arab Media

by Miriam Cotton - MediaBite

Sun Jun 24, 2007 17:13

From Schecter on Znet: 'The Foxification of Al Jazeera"

"You don't need to bomb Al Jazeera to change its direction," said my source. "There is a softer way to influence its direction by taking it over from within and it can happen quietly almost as if in slow motion. You 'broaden' some programs, announce new 'guidelines,' issue new edicts reinforcing top-down control, purge some professionals you don't like, and then give more positive unchallenged airtime to backers of US foreign policy. Washington would not be open about any behind the scenes role it is playing in all this for fear of triggering a very negative public reaction."

This has all been happening over the last month or so.

http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/18schech...r.cfm

Tears of Despair and Anger in Palestine

Sun Jun 24, 2007 17:23

mcotton at mediabite dot org

http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2007-06/21fletch...r.cfm

For real?

by Jim O'Sullivan

Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:26

Rabbi Warren Goldstein also wrote the following,

"What if, in siding against Israel, the world is siding against the only beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East, thereby endangering us all because the fate of Jews is often a sign portending the future?"

How could anyone take seriously the author of such nonsense?

Muddled thoughts

by Feyadeen

Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:45

The good rabbi might care to explain - if Israel is the ANC of the Middle East, why was the Israeli state the most loyal and vociferous ally of the former apartheid regime in his home country? The Israeli elites clearly recognised the affinity between their treatment of the Palestinians and the SA regime's treatment of its own people. And why hasn't the ANC been so quick to recognise the parallel? Every prominent leader of the anti-apartheid struggle, from Mandela to Tutu, has spoken out in soldarity with the Palestinian cause.

Meanwhile, he turns to the Balfour declaration for proof of the legitimacy of Israel's conduct. A declaration issued by the then-greatest imperial power on earth, which held hundreds of millions of people in subjugation through brutal military occupation and exploitation. And issued by a man whose anti-Semitism was brazen and shameless, who introduced the first bill in the House of Commons to restrict immigation in response to the exodus of Jewish pogrom victims from Eastern Europe, and told the assembled MPs that Jews would be unable to integrate into British society and must be kept out.

Methinks Rabbi Goldstein might like to consider whether such folk are really true friends of the Jewish people, and wonder why those who stood full-square against fascism in Europe and defended the Jews in their darkest hour are now the same people defending the democratic rights of the Palestinians. Perhaps he's comfortable knowing that the most reliable defenders of Israel in the USA are the direct heirs of the Crusaders and the Inquisition, the people who believe that God will send the Jews to hell when the Rapture comes. If so, he really needs to get his head straight

US involvement in Palestine chaos

Tue Jun 26, 2007 13:51

Jonathan Steele exposes US action to destabilise Palestine and to break their democracy

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2108926,00.html

Stunningly misleading article in todays Irish Examiner

Tue Jun 26, 2007 17:18

http://www.irishexaminer.com/irishexaminer/pages/story....1.asp

Another chance to observe your racism

Wed Jun 27, 2007 14:07

Ah, a little visit from our old transparently racist friend "Observer". Sure, sure, South Africa was MUCH better off under apartheid - all the white people had nice swimming pools and all the servants they could want, the blacks lived in shacks and only spoke when they were spoken to, and there were nice death squads to torture and murder anyone who objected to this set-up. Equally, Mozambique and Angola were much happier when Portuguese colonists sucked them dry. It's terrible to see, isn't it, those uppity blacks in SA going on STRIKE and actually demanding HIGHER wages!?! Who do they think they are - human?

Tony - Falklands question

by Jolly Red Giant - Socialist Party/CWI

Wed Jun 27, 2007 15:35

You said
'Remember the internet, Dorothy. I did - I carried out a google search and found an excellent article about Militant's position on the Falklands war.
Anyone who wishes can read it here, assuming I've managed to link successfully -

http://www.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/pubs/sr-js.htm

Now I'm not a supporter and/or member of the SWP (I live 12,00 km away, and don't have the health to be an activist) but it's obvious they've nailed you here.'

If you are going to criticise the position of the Militant/CWI on the Falklands War - at least do it with what we actually said not what the SWP pass off for analysis. The SWP were/are incapable of understanding Marxism and Marxist analysis and take a hop-skip and jump approach to critiquing political statements.

If you want to deal with the CWI attitude to the Falklands I suggest you don't just stop at the first item that comes up on a google search.

Try this

http://www.socialismtoday.org/108/falklands.html

Number of comments per page

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Voltaire Network

The Enemy Without

Comments (13 of 13)