Rights, Freedoms and Repression Woman whose soup run fed 250 homeless in Dublin told to cease or face €300k fine 21:35 Feb 07 2 comments Germany cannot give up it's Nazi past - Germany orders Holocaust survivor institutionalized over Cov... 23:31 Jan 14 1 comments Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 Afte... 23:16 Jan 06 0 comments Protests over post-vaccination deaths spread across South Korea 23:18 Dec 26 0 comments Chris Hedges: The execution of Julian Assange 22:19 Dec 19 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireThe Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović
Human Rights in IrelandIndymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy
Lockdown Skeptics
Catching Covid Does Not Lower Your IQ Tue Jul 23, 2024 09:00 | Noah Carl
The BBC Has ?Fact-Checked? Labour?s Claim that Renewables are Cheaper than Fossil Fuels and Declared... Tue Jul 23, 2024 07:00 | Paul Homewood
News Round-Up Tue Jul 23, 2024 01:16 | Richard Eldred
Will Trump Ever Admit Lockdown Was a Mistake? Mon Jul 22, 2024 19:35 | Jeffrey A. Tucker
Joe Biden Out in Apparent Palace Coup Mon Jul 22, 2024 17:30 | Eugyppius
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionNetanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en |
European Court Of Human Rights Turns To Restrictive Irish Abortion Law
national |
rights, freedoms and repression |
feature
Wednesday September 07, 2005 00:59 by Niav/One of IMC - Indymedia Ireland
The European Court of Human Rights today held preliminary hearings on the case of an Irish woman claiming her human rights were violated when she was forced to travel to Britain for an abortion. Taken from an analysis on D by a member of the Alliance For Choice Some coverage on the topic from the good folk on IMC Ireland: Back street abortions illustrate need for free, safe and legal abortion services in Ireland | Alliance For Choice condemns Bush's 'War on Women'! | Restrictive Abortion Information Legislation Jeopardises Women's Health | Day Of Action Against The Information Act | Pro Life Campaign considering legal action against Midland Health Board | Interview on the legacy of the X-case | Do You Remeber the Last Time? The Abortion Referendum of 2002 | Yes, It was No..
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (12 of 12)
Jump To Comment: 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1That poll was actually 80% in favour, not 90%!
On the Late Late Show last Friday there was a poll of the audience and 90% supported abortion in some circumstances.
An sáraíonn bunchearta dlíthe daoine?
In ruling, the Court does not have the authority to revise Irish law, it simply finds a violation of the Convention and then the Irish State must revise its laws to comply with its obligations under the Convention. The Convention obliges the State to take action to protect rights effectively, depending on the context and expense of such an obligation. The case of Norris v. Ireland 1988 provided an example of this process; the Court found that the criminalisation of homosexuality in Ireland was a violation of the right to privacy under the Convention and it then fell upon the Oireachtas to revise the law which it did by decriminalising homosexuality.
"The right to choose is a basic human right"
[Is buncheart daonna ceart rogha]
Tagaim leis an ceart seo ach ní thagaim le ceart rogha beatha neach eile a chealú.
Indeed, it is the most basic of rights, a right that is not trumped by any other right...
Incidentally, unless i am very much mistaken, that court can only make recommendations. They cannot (and i would think people here would be happy about this) overrule Ireland's constitution...
I am aware that this an emotional issue for many people, but people should be respectful enough of women to allow women to decide for themselves whether they have an abortion or not. The woman's right to bodily integrity is the most important issue here and should be the one that we give most importance to. A woman should not be forced under any circumstances to remain pregnant when she does not want to be. To say to a woman that she must go through with a pregnancy is an invasion of her privacy and also an assault on her human rights.
The foetus is not a baby and is several months away from becoming one. It is a cluster of cells, incapable of thinking or feeling pain. As such, it is not a human in our understanding of what it means to be a human and it is offensive to accord it the same rights as real people.
Abortion is a normal safe procedure for the termination of pregnancies. The sooner we all get used to this and Ireland joins the mature nations of the world in allowing women to decide for themselves the better. I look forward to a day when abortion is provided freely, legally and safely in Dublin and every other town and city in our land.
Ní raibh beatha na máthar i mbaol, máisea?
Ní maith liom go gcuirfear chun báis daoine le aicídí tromchúiseacha
Edward's Syndrome or Trisomy 18 is a rare chromosome syndrome with severe effects. The prognosis of Edwards Syndrome is poor. It often results in spontaneous abortion or early death after birth.
Having made a very difficult and emotional decision, D should not have been forced to leave this country for a termination.
I suppose this case is one of those grey areas where neither side can just keep shouting the same slogans.
Im not familiar with the illness the child suffered, does nayone have any knowledge of the quality of life the child could have had?
Dar liom, is coir an marú. Ní ceart é
Government denies claims in rights case
Tim O'Brien in Strasbourg
This is an article from todays Irish Times
The Government has rejected a claim at the European Court of Human Rights that a woman seeking an abortion in Ireland was treated in an inhuman and degrading fashion by the State.
The Government has also rejected claims by the woman's legal team that the State's regulations breached human rights conventions on privacy and family life; the right to receive information; the right to an effective remedy; and the prohibition of discrimination.
The woman, identified only as "D", is an Irish national who was described in court in Strasbourg yesterday as "a woman of education and means". It was a preliminary hearing and a ruling is awaited on whether the case is admissible for a full hearing.
Counsel for "D", Barbara Hewson, told the court the woman's pregnancy with twins in late 2001 was initially "a joyous occasion".
However, after eight weeks one foetus stopped developing and died. The second foetus had Trisomy 18 or Edward's Syndrome, a fatal abnormality.
Ms Hewson told the court her client wished to take no part in a wider debate on abortion but is seeking a declaration that in dealing with lethal, foetal abnormality, the State had breached six articles of the Convention on Human Rights.
She maintained that the devastating impact of the diagnosis was unnecessarily exacerbated by the Regulation of Information (Services Outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act, 1995. This Act prevents a doctor from advocating abortion as well as making a referral for a patient with an abortion provider, where the life of the mother is not at risk.
Counsel for "D" maintained that the State, having advised on the condition, had effectively reneged on its responsibility for treatment. It was also argued that "D" was discriminated against as a pregnant woman or as a pregnant woman with a lethal foetal abnormality.
Counsel explained that ultimately "D" made arrangements with her partner and travelled to Britain for an abortion.
However, counsel for the Government, Donal O'Donnell SC, said the only restrictions imposed by the 1995 Act were limited ones relating to directive counselling or helping to arrange an abortion. Mr O'Donnell argued that the State now guarantees the right to freedom of information on abortion as well as the right to travel.
Mr O'Donnell told the court that a finding in favour of "D" would be, in effect, a direction to Ireland on the type and regulation of such services, an issue into which the court had previously said it would not go. Such a move, he argued, would potentially turn the Court of Human Rights into a legislative body, and that had not been envisaged by the signatories to the convention.
In relation to "D"'s claims, Mr O'Donnell said she had not sought legal advice at the time of the pregnancy, nor had she sought to challenge the regulations or seek a hearing in camera or use a pseudonym, all of which were avenues open to her.
Mr O'Donnell said that even in the time after the abortion it had been open to "D" to seek a declaration that her rights had been abused, but she had not done this. The Court of Human Rights was being used as a court of first instance, Mr O'Donnell argued.
In response to a question from the Irish member of the court, Mr Justice Hedigan, Ms Hewson said the Court of Human Rights could accept jurisdiction where an applicant had no reasonable prospect of success in the legal system in his or her home country.
Ms Hewson said time and anonymity had been issues during the pregnancy, while after the pregnancy the issues were anonymity and the tendency of the Irish courts to treat the issue as "moot", something that is past or no longer relevant.
Where this has happened applicants could be left with substantial legal bills for the Government's legal team as well as the likelihood of being identified, she said.
In his response to Judge Hedigan, Mr O'Donnell instanced the "X" case and the "C" case, which had demonstrated that anonymity was available to litigants. A date for the court's ruling has not been set.