The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović Anti-Empire >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog. We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
|
How open IS Indymedia ?
national |
arts and media |
opinion/analysis
Thursday January 20, 2005 19:21 by Media_Matters - Private individual
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
Can a truly open forum exist at all?
A query to users of this website, regarding the 'openess' of a self-styled open media forum. I wish to pose a question to the users of this website:
Can this website live up to the objective of being a truly open forum, which it has set itself?
Notwithstanding the occasional need to edit stories that are too long and the need to remove copy that is blatantly libelous, is it possible for Indymedia to be truly open, given that the overwhelming number of people who would use a forum like this are people who do so because they believe it is a better information forum than the traditional media fora, such as those controlled by privately owned print and broadcast organisations?
Following on from this, is it not the case that the content on an open forum, despite its best intentions, reflects the interests of its users, and as such this forum is no different editorially to any right of centre forum where it would attempt to promulgate a certain worldview by prioritising news stories and other information based on ideological considerations?
For instance, imagine if a centre-right information website posted news stories on such topics as 'Bush administration vows to protect the life of the unborn' or 'Ahern government builds strong links with US to boost Irish jobs' . If this fictional centre-right website allowed dissenters to post objections on their news stories, as does Indymedia, then how would this differ in practice from Indymedia, insofar as both would operate along the exact same editorial process - whereby dissenters are accomodated as an aside to the ideological prioritisation of news and comment which determines the content of the site? Aside from this, what remains on such a site is surely little different than any other internet chat-room, or is it?
A quick perusal of the news items on Indymedia over a few days shows that the news items posted on Indymedia are mostly pro-left of centre. I am not saying this is a bad thing nor am I saying it is a good thing.
However, is it possible that the apparent ideological leaning within the prioritised news and information on the Indymedia website has morphed the website into a left of centre chat page, and that it cannot make claim to being balanced in any particular way, or do you disagree with such a suggestion?
I'm sure some respondents will question the agenda, background and motives of a non-positive post such as this.
I don't have any particular gripe with Indymedia. I am not a regular user of the site as I am wary of the lack of transparency inherent in anonymous online messages (I do see the irony of this as my own name is withheld. I do not believe there is sufficient accountability in ananymous posts nor do I expect people to take this post more seriously than I would do so myself, which is also one of the possible flaws in any online news forum).
I do not have any simple answers to my own questions but I am curious about what users will write in reply.
------------------------------
------------------------------
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (17 of 17)