Upcoming Events

International | Anti-Capitalism

no events match your query!

New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills Sat Jul 27, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
With heat pump numbers forecast to rise, the energy watchdog Ofgem has predicted that bills for those who continue using gas boilers will surge.
The post Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies Sat Jul 27, 2024 15:00 | David Turver
So much for Labour's pledge to cut energy bills by £300, says David Turver. Under GB Energy, our bills can only go one way, and that is up.
The post Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? Sat Jul 27, 2024 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Awful audio, bizarre performances, embarrassing gaffes and a woke 'Last Supper' parody that has outraged Christians turned the Paris Olympics opening ceremony into a rain-soaked disaster.
The post Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams... Sat Jul 27, 2024 11:46 | Steven Tucker
The Muslim Vote wants Labour to abolish Victorian ?spiritual influence? laws that prevent religious leaders from swaying voters, but Steven Tucker argues that in cities like Leicester these laws are more vital than ever.
The post Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams Doing the Same appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Live and Let D.E.I. Sat Jul 27, 2024 09:00 | Dr James Allan
Law professor James Allan has had a bet on Donald Trump to win the Presidency for two years. He's even more confident of winning now that Kamala Harris has become the Democratic nominee.
The post Live and Let D.E.I. appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

LIES VS. FACTS

category international | anti-capitalism | opinion/analysis author Saturday February 07, 2004 22:56author by Christopher Henryauthor email cjh332003 at yahoo dot comauthor address St. Louis, Mo , usa Report this post to the editors

An article about the true nature of Marx and socialism/communism

LIES VS. FACTS
By Christopher Henry


Millions around the world cheered and celebrated the day the Soviet Union and its allies in Eastern Europe collapsed…among those celebrating were many socialists/communists. This may sound strange to many, but it is indeed the truth.

Since the 1850’s the truth of socialism (in general), communism and Karl Marx (in particular) has been severely distorted by those who are opposed to it and those that claim to advocate it. I’m constantly angered, disappointed and saddened by the fact that to this day people still don’t know what socialism/communism is, and more importantly what it is not!

There are many lies and misconceptions that have been told about socialism/ communism; I, at this time, will give you the cold, hard, proven facts about it. First of all, socialism and communism is in fact the same thing, communism is only Karl Marx’s version of socialism; if you read into it you will see that Marx is, and is referred to as, a socialist.

Since it’s inception in the early 1800’s there have been many versions of socialism; from “utopian socialism” espoused by Owens, Saint-Simon and Fourier to the “conspiratorial socialism” of Babeuf and Blanqui, “anarchism” of Proudhon and Bakunin right up through the so-called socialism of Lenin and Mao.

Some forms of socialism do advocate tight governmental controls of everything, however, these forms are in the minority and in no way are advocated by most socialists. It is indeed unfortunate that socialism/communism has become a flag of convenience that accommodates bureaucrats and market-minded economists and allows evil-minded two-bit dictators a way of deceiving people in order to basically enslave them. Most socialists/communists do however advocate Karl Marx’s version of socialism in which no way involves a large governmental bureaucracy that controls everything, and anyone who calls him/herself a socialist/communist that is in favor of such a thing is not a true socialist.

I am providing this information in order to set the record straight and so that in the end you may make up your own mind about it since our so-called leaders are afraid to tell the you truth that they’ve known about for so, so long.

Let us examine just a few of the lies told about socialism/communism.

LIE- Marx was just some old gray haired radical with wacky utopian ideas.

FACT- Marx was an intellectual, philosopher, historian, economist and sociologist. He was a Doctor of Philosophy; he was fluent in Latin, Greek and French. He studied Legal Sciences, Roman law, mythology, modern art history, German law, European legal systems and Natural law at the University of Bonn. At the University of Berlin he studied criminal law, anthropology, Ecclesiastical law, criminal procedures, Prussian Civil codes and logic.

Karl Marx confronts us as a thinker of world-historical dimensions; it would be hard to imagine another scholar who has had as much influence on intellectual history as Karl Marx. He provided a complex and profound analysis of the class system under capitalism- an analysis that, although over a 100 years old continues to inform sociological analysis and has been the basis for major world change, the study of modern sociology still begins with the work of Karl Marx. On every continent, to this day, people find inspiration in his writings. His Communist Manifesto is the second most published book in history, the Bible being the first.

LIE- Communism is a brutal repressive system ruled by a dictator in which people have no civil liberties and are forced to live a sub-standard life in the name of equality.

FACT- When Marx became a socialist, what set him apart from other socialists of his time was his insistence upon the democratic character of the coming revolution. The commitment to democracy dominates his whole life, this can be found in all of his writings. The core idea of communism is democracy, not a chairman or dictator or bureaucracy. Marx makes this point very clear from his earliest writings, in 1847 he wrote: “We are not among those socialists who are out to destroy personal liberty, who wish to turn the world into one huge barrack or into a gigantic workhouse… We have no desire to exchange liberty for equality. We are convinced that in no social order will be freedom assured as in a society based upon communal ownership”.

“Man’s self-esteem, freedom, must be awakened once more in the heart of these men. Only this feeling, which disappeared from the world with the Greeks…can once more transform society into a fellowship of men working for their highest purposes, a democratic state.”---Karl Marx, A Correspondence of 1843

“Freedom consists in converting the state from an organ superimposed upon society into one completely subordinated to it.”--- Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program

LIE- In communism you can’t own property.

FACT- “Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property!...There is no need to abolish that”.---Karl Marx, Proletarians and Communists

“We by no means intend to abolish this personal appropriation of the products of labor, an appropriation that is made for the maintenance and reproduction of human life, and that leaves no surplus wherewith to command the labor of others. All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the laborer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it”---Karl Marx, Proletarians and Communists

What Marx meant by the abolition of private property (or bourgeois property) was that no one person or small group of persons was to privately own property that was utilized to make profits (at the expense of others) for their own advantage, not personal property! Everyone has been led to believe that the common ownership of property means that you share everything including personal belongings, not true. Marx wrote clearly that common ownership only included those items which were necessary for the means of production i.e. factories, foundries, mines, etc., etc.

LIE- Communism forces everyone to be equal.

FACT- “ One man is superior to another physically or mentally and so supplies more labor in the same time, or can labor for a longer time; and labor, to serve as a measure, must be defined by its duration or intensity, otherwise it ceases to be a standard of measurement. This equal right is an unequal right for unequal labor. It recognizes no class differences, because everyone is only a worker like everyone else; but tacitly recognizes unequal individual endowment and thus productive capacity as natural privileges. It is, therefore, a right of inequality, in its content, like every right.”---Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program

Marx was an intellectual and was intelligent enough to know that in no way could any system, no matter how good it might be, could ever have all individuals equal, he knew that to even try would be pure folly.

LIE- A person would receive the same no matter how hard he/she works.

FACT- Further, one man is married, another not; one has more children than another, and so on and so forth. Thus, with an equal performance of labor, and hence and equal share in the social consumption fund, one will in fact receive more than another, one will be richer than another, and so on. To avoid these defects, right instead of being equal would have to be unequal.”---Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program

LIE- There would be no incentive to work…it would make everyone lazy.

FACT- This is the funniest of the all the lies about communism…what incentive is there to clean your house or yard? What incentive is there to do many of the things that we do in which we work but yet we receive no monetary compensation for?

Marx clearly states that the economic goal of communism is to require everyone to work an equal and minimum amount of time and to eliminate differential rewards at least as life’s basic necessities are concerned. The motivation to perform the accepted minimum amount of work would derive from a sense of civic duty and/or the need to acquire life’s material necessities, while the motivation to do additional work would derive from the enjoyment of unalienated labor or, alternatively, from it’s material rewards justly earned.

The fact of the matter is, is that the incentive to work will be the same as it is now. In order to secure the basic necessities of life we have to work. The last part of the above statement also serves to show that people will not be equal, if a person decides to do additional work he or she will in fact receive more; in other words, if a person wants to have more material items in which to enrich their lives, all they have to do is work for it. And what about those lazy folks? Simple fact is, is that in any system you’re going to have a very small minority of person’s who genuinely don’t want to work.

LIE- You don’t have the right to own guns in communism.

FACT- “Universal arming of the people. In the future the army shall be simultaneously a worker army, so the military arm shall not, as in the past, merely consume, but shall produce more than is actually necessary for it's upkeep. This will like wise be an aid to the organization of labor”.---Karl Marx, The Demands of the Communist Party in Germany

“The arming of the whole proletariat with flintlocks, carbines, guns, ammunition must be put in hand directly...Arms and ammunition are on no account to be handed over; every attempt at disarmament must be frustrated, by force if need be”.---Karl Marx, Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League

LIE- Communism forbids religion and the worship of God.

FACT- Most communists are atheists, however, many do believe in God, like me, the author; Marx only wished to see religious organizations diminished to the point where they exercised no power to influence society at the behest of the ruling class, a true separation of church and state. As far as the right of a person to worship as one pleases Marx stated that:

“These rights include freedom of conscience, the right to practice one’s chosen religion. The privilege of faith is expressly recognized, either as a right of man or as a consequence of one of the rights of man-the right of freedom”.- Karl Marx, On The Jewish Question

“The incompatibility between religion and the rights of man is so little part of the concept of the rights of man that the right to be religious in the fashion that pleases one and to practice a particular form of worship is explicitly included among the rights of man. The privilege of faith is a universal human right.” - Karl Marx, On The Jewish Question

LIE- The USSR collapsed and that proves communism doesn’t work.

FACT- Everyone has been taught that the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, N. Korea, Vietnam, etc., etc. are communist, this is simply not true; there has never been a communist country in existence, the closest thing to communism that has existed was the Paris Commune and the Amana Colonies (The Amana colonies existed right here in the US for almost a hundred years).


The USSR was formed by the Bolshevik Party after the 1917 revolution, they later renamed themselves the Communist Party after the term used by Marx. It would seem that the only test politicians and the media use to determine if a country is communist is whether or not they call themselves communist. If 30 years ago the Hell’s Angels changed their name to Jehovah’s Witness’s would they actually be Jehovah’s Witness’s? Of course not!


In order to simplify this particular topic I will use the Soviet Union as an example because we think that you and most people will agree that the USSR was the model for all other so-called communist countries. Who was the “father” of the Soviet Union?
Of course it was Vladimir I. Lenin. Lenin himself stated on numerous occasions (in speeches, articles and letters) that the USSR was not communist or socialist. If you read his [Lenin’s] works you will see that he strove to establish capitalism in Russia, state capitalism specifically.


It is because Russia cannot advance from the economic situation now existing-here without traversing the ground which is common to state capitalism.--- V.I. Lenin,“The Tax in Kind”-The Significance Of The New Policy And Its Conditions, Published: May 1921


“The alternative (and this is the only sensible and the last possible policy) is not to try to prohibit or put the lock on the development of capitalism, but to channel it into state capitalism. This is economically possible, for state capitalism exists-in varying form and degree-wherever there are elements of unrestricted trade and capitalism in general”.--- V.I. Lenin, “Tax in Kind”-Freedom to trade and concessions, Published: May 1921

“Since the spring of 1921, instead of this approach, plan, method, or mode of action, we have been adopting (we have not yet “adopted” but are still “adopting”, and have not yet fully realized it) a totally different method, a reformist type of method: not to break up the old social economic system-trade, petty production, petty proprietorship, capitalism-but to revive trade, petty proprietorship, capitalism, while cautiously and gradually getting the upper hand over them, or making it possible to subject them to state regulation only to the extent that they revive”.---V.I. Lenin, “The importance of gold now and after the complete victory of socialism” Published: Pravda No. 251, November 6-7, 1921

In its intermediary and regulating function, its concern to maintain social ranks, and its exploitation of the state apparatus for personal goals, the Soviet Union is similar to every other bureaucracy, especially the fascist, a bureaucracy that had converted itself into an uncontrolled caste alien to socialism/communism.

The state in the USSR (and all other so-called communist countries) acted as a collective capitalist class, ruled by Stalinist dictatorship(s) and driven by military competition. The capitalist nature of the USSR and its allies became clear with the collapse of Stalinism in 1989-91, when yesterday’s Communist Party bureaucrats became today’s corporate executives.

So, in short, the USSR was not communist, it was in fact a state-capitalist society led by a small bureaucratic elite. They were/are communist in name only (in fact they were Bolsheviks and what you had was not the “spread of communism”, but the spread of bolshevism), they called themselves communists in order to make the claim that they were bringing to the people a system of true freedom as envisioned by Marx, instead all they received was an ‘ole bait and switch routine.

“They” used the term communist in order to hoodwink their people in order to take and keep power and “we” use that term for the exact same reason; except that “we” use “them” as an example to our people to make them automatically reject it, instead of educating them as to what it truly is and thus keeping the upper class in it’s dominate position in society.

LIE- Communism could never work.

FACT- People that have researched this subject know what a simple system it is…and it is a simple system, it’s not hard to understand at all if you know the facts. It is all together amusing and ironic that since the late 1930’s man has split the atom, cured scores of diseases, invented computers that can perform a billion actions a second, invented artificial hearts, performed intricate brain surgeries, mapped the human genome, put men into space and on the moon and invented nano-technology. With all the countless technological marvels that we have now, that just a few short years ago were thought to be beyond the realm of possibility; doesn’t it stand to reason, that we could group together the most brilliant minds of society, and give them the simple task of making communism work?

I think everyone would agree that Albert Einstein was first and foremost a genius, everyone would also agree the he was a lover of freedom and liberty. What people do not realize is that Albert Einstein was a socialist/communist and was against the capitalist system and was very much in favor of communism. I am sure that by himself he could have worked out the particulars of making communism work. After all, if the common citizens of the Paris Commune and the simple immigrants of the Amana Colonies came very close to making it work surely the best minds of today’s world surely could!

As it was stated briefly before, my intention is to provide you with just a few of the facts about the true nature of Marx and communism so that YOU can make up your own mind. Some maybe asking the question-“If communism is so great why all the lies about it?” It’s very simple folks, think about it for a minute; the powers that be know what it is, they know that to teach the truth about Marx and communism would mean the end of their power and control! Marx and communism is a deadly virus that threatens their privileged positions, so in order to inoculate themselves against this virus (much in the same way an influenza vaccine works) they spoon-feed the people these lies so that the people will automatically reject it whenever a threat appears.

My intention is not an attempt to change anyone’s mind; my intention is to have you change your own mind by hopefully reading what Marx actually wrote and learning the truth. A system in which a person can go without the basic necessities of life simply because they don’t have enough money is truly immoral and disgusting. A system in which a person works forty hours a week and cannot afford adequate healthcare, but yet, is told repeatedly that all you have to do is work hard and you’ll be successful; it’s criminal. Though we can’t have a perfect society, we can sure as hell have a better one than this and it all starts with abolishing ignorance and lies…in other words, it all starts with people like you learning the truth!

Questions/comments can be directed to: Chris or Brandon by E-mail at- marxist_duo2004@yahoo.com

Suggested readings-

KARL MARX- THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO Edited by Frederic L. Bender, Norton Critical Editions---Includes all prefaces by Marx and Engel’s- sources and backgrounds- history of Marxism- interpretations.

THE PORTABLE KARL MARX Edited by Eugene Kamenka, Penguin Books---The complete Marx anthology includes personal letters, early and major writings.

WHY SOCIALISM? By Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions From Monthly Review, New York, May 1949

SOCIALISM FROM BELOW By Prof. David McNally www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/contemp/pamset/socfrombel/sfb_main.htm

THE MARXIST INTERNET ARCHIEVE www.marxist.org ---Major writings by Marx, Engel’s, Rosa Luxembourg, Lenin, Mao and many other major figures in socialist history.

author by Laura - nonepublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 00:23author email lfarrell at esatclear dot ieauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

What an interesting article. I really enjoyed some of the comments.

I think that the USSR aspired to Communism, and was well intentioned, but unfortunately they inherited the very problems that led to revolution in the first place, and so the elitist bureacracy developed. Stalin's paranoia altered the original goals still further and his purges eliminated most of the real thinkers behind the Soviet revolution.

Of course you must remember that the USSR, like China and Cuba after them were under constant attack and always subjected to opposition. The USSR did not collapse entirely of its own accord, but as a result of internal and external pressures.

The problem since is that the triumphalist right have celebrated the fall of the USSR as an example of its "fundamental flaw." This has demoralised the left to such an extent that we have lost critical mass, such as what existed in the USSR in 1917 and interestingly, if you read Trotsky, in early 1930s Germany, where the communist party failed to capitalise on its support and ended up paying for the failure with their lives in concentration camps.

author by Tpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 01:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Communism" in Russia and China were examples of Authoritarian Communism which in a way is a sort of contradiction. In both these cases people still followed leaders and consequently a power pyramid developed.

Capitalism of course ultimately leads to a very similar result except through a different route. In both cases though it results in a tiny few dictating the way society is run, instead of the main body of the masses.

Hopefully next time, we will try an non-authoritarian revolution like the Spainish Rev in 1936 and it will be successful.

author by redjadepublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 02:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

[start of rant]

In my humble opinion, socialism is always democratic or it is not socialism at all.

All the leninist 'experiments' are just hijackings of the 'socialist' brand name.

socialism means social-ism - an ism with a bias for society at large - a way of organising society for the interests of society first, not in the interests of only capital nor self-appointed elites.

implementing this democratic ideal is the struggle we are generally engaged in - 'statist' socialist or 'non-statist' [read: democraticly elected to a state structures or self-organised, anarchist-ish structures]

Before the Russian Revolution, the terms socialism and democracy were redundant. I had hoped with the fall of the leninist 'socialist' governments around 1989 that it was a chance for the larger movement to go back to that heritage - silly me!

For some reason, people still cling on to that old failed 'revolution', all that it inspired later and glorify it to no end, in spite of its horrific crimes against humanity.

Socialists need to always remember that democracy is always radical.

[/end of rant]

Why Socialism?
by Albert Einstein
http://www.monthlyreview.org/598einst.htm

Related Link: http://redjade.alturl.com
author by Zinovievpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 02:20author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I have come to believe however, that Marxism is fundamentally flawed. For these reasons:

1. Marxist movements can only grow in a society of gross inequality, where there poor are considrably poorer than the small minority who are extremely wealthy.

2. The wealthy will resist any change in the status quo, hence any change will require violent revolution.

3. As we have seen, ever since 1789, such a violent overthrow of the exisiting order releases forces which cannot be controlled, a bloodbath ensues, setting the scene for an authoritarian, repressive state - as we saw in France, Russia, China, Vietnam, Cuba, North korea and elsewhere.

4. It is impossible for the leaders of the revolution ever to declare the revolution complete. However much the leadership would like to introduce free elections, it is unable to allow non-Marxist candidates to stand. This will ensure that discontent will continue indefinitely and therfore the regime must continue to abuse Human Rights until the system collapses under the strain of internal dissent, as we saw in the case of the USSR. China is moving towards a similar stage and before long it too will no longer be a "People's Republic".

author by The Magnificent Baron Rothschildpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 02:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

And I, my dear friend Zinoviev have come to believe that capitalism is fundamentally flawed.

For these reasons:

1. As capitalism thrives it produces a society of gross inequality, where the poor are considerably poorer than the small minority who are extremely wealthy.

2. The wealthy resist any change in the status quo, hence any change will require violent revolution.

3. As we have seen, ever since 1789, such a violent overthrow of the exisiting order releases forces which cannot be controlled, a bloodbath ensues, setting the scene for an authoritarian, repressive state - as we have seen too often before in history.

4. It is impossible for the leaders of the capitalist system ever to effectively mitigate the excesses of the system. However much the leadership would like to introduce some degree of humanity into the workings of capitalist society it is unable to allow non-capitalist interests to be taken into account to any significant degree. This will ensure that discontent will continue indefinitely and therefore the regime must continue to abuse Human Rights until the system moves towards collapse under the strain of internal dissent, as we are now seeing in the USA. The EU, the other great capitalist bloc, is moving towards a similar stage and before long it too will start to look increasingly frayed around the edges.

author by Zinovievpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 03:09author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Total disregard for the truth in your lame riposte.

Tell me about Human Rights violations in Capitalist countries. I'm particularly interested in the US and the EU.

author by Baron Rothschildpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 03:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

.... I say Zinoviev old chap, surely a little poetic licence is allowed .....

I was going to mention Guantanamo Bay, but then I forgot that's in Cuba, not the USA .....

Related Link: http://web.amnesty.org/report2003/usa-summary-eng
author by Baron Rothschildpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 03:21author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You may find some details here ....

Related Link: http://web.amnesty.org/report2003/2eu-index-eng
author by a penguin for magyarpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 03:48author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Writing smuggled out of labour camps, punk music, and paintings featuring Potemkin villages and death certificates went on show in Budapest this week, telling the story of the counter-culture that throbbed behind the Iron Curtain.

The exhibition titled “Samizdat: Alternative cultures in central and eastern Europe 1956-1989” features anti-communist art and writings that were banned by the authorities but spread through secret printing and distribution networks. “The thoughts contained on these scraps of paper ... often put together in prisons, had such power that they managed to scare the socialist governments,” German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said when he opened the exhibition. “Intellectually and culturally, the Iron Curtain never succeeded in dividing Europe.”

Related Link: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_7-2-2004_pg9_1
author by And Yet...publication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 16:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The SP say that North Korea is a Workers State. So a Workers State gasses children. What will it take for the likes of Mr Henry realise that North Korea is in fact a Feudal dictatorship.

author by Bill Gatespublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 19:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

What fool would idealise North Korea as a Workers State? Get off the smack.

author by truthpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 20:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"The SP say that North Korea is a Workers State"

Incorrect. The SP regard North Korea as a brutal repressive and disgusting regime and call for a political revolution in North Korea. In saying this the SP defend the state owned and planned character of the North Korean economy.

author by Dr Adlerpublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 22:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Truth thinks that NK is "disgusting" but that the SP defend its "planned" character!!

Ever stop to think that its "disgusting" nature might just have something to do with the fact that the state owns everything and every one? And the SP obviously thinks this is a good thing. And sure why wouldnt they as the "character" of NK is a copy of the War Communist model foisted on the USSR by Trotsky and his friends.

Monstrosities like NK result from the fundamentally flawed nature of totalitarian socialism, which attempts to suppress human nature and human initiative. The fact that this comes from a benign origin - of wanting to eliminate poverty and so on, is no excuse. We ought to have at least learnt that much from the horrors of the 20th century.

author by Importunatepublication date Sun Feb 08, 2004 23:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The "state owned and planned character" of the North Koreean regime is the whole cause of the disgusting brutality and idsreard for Human rights we see in NK.

Every Marxist state has trampled on the human rights of it's citizens and massacred millions of them.

Don't you see a "cause and effect" thing going on here?

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy