France Rises Up Against the New Fascism - Vaccine Passports 23:57 Jul 21 3 comments George Floyd: one death too many in the “land of the free” 23:58 Jun 23 0 comments The leveraged buyout, exploitation and punishment beating of Greece as warning to others. 11:45 May 11 0 comments Red Banner issue 60 out now 13:18 Jun 22 0 comments Red Banner issue 59 out now 17:46 Mar 28 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
Experts Call For Return of Lockdown-Style Social Distancing as Flu Surges, Claiming ?a Fifth of Thos... Tue Dec 24, 2024 13:46 | Will Jones
J.K. Rowling Leads Backlash Against Sturgeon for Claiming There Was No Public Opposition to Gender S... Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:23 | Will Jones
Science Shock: CO2 is Good for the Planet, Peer-Reviewed Studies Suggest Tue Dec 24, 2024 09:00 | Chris Morrison
Whoever Rules Britain Is Going to Be Unpopular Tue Dec 24, 2024 07:00 | Noah Carl
News Round-Up Tue Dec 24, 2024 00:40 | Richard Eldred |
The Neoliberal Paradigm And Civic Responsibility
international |
anti-capitalism |
opinion/analysis
Saturday June 11, 2011 13:05 by Gerard Farrell
An article exploring the cultural effects of several decades of neoliberal ascendancy in the political arena. Previously published in the the 'Social and political review' of Trinity college Dublin; just putting it out there... It is a commonplace of social theory that civic engagement is stronger in those who enjoy a greater amount of social capital. Conversely, a sense of responsibility to contribute to the smooth functioning of society is said to be weaker in those groups who have less of a stake in that society. (Giddens, 2006, pp.673-675). I will argue in this essay that this model requires modification to take into account a growing decline in civic responsibility in the west, which prevails not merely amongst social groups which are traditionally thought of as excluded, but is widespread in society as a whole. This decline has its roots in profound cultural changes that have taken place over the past thirty years, which are a consequence of the neoliberal political consensus in this period, and a mindset which this ideology has fostered in our society, in which the logic of markets, consumerism and personal autonomy have come to eclipse collectivist notions of social and civic responsibility. This anecdote bears many features of what theorists call a ‘free-rider problem.’ This occurs when some members of a group partake of a public good while avoiding any personal cost to themselves. More obvious examples of free-riding would include (literally) fare-dodging on pubic transport or a worker benefiting from a wage-increase that results from strike action in which they took no part. (Marshall and Scott, 2010) What is common to all these examples is that the free-rider may enjoy the benefits of the public good concerned, only if the majority of his fellow-consumers continue to bear the cost of its maintenance; we have seen what happens if everyone chooses to follow their example. One of neoliberalism’s founding fathers, Friedrich Hayek, argued that this is a problem inherent to any collectivised enterprise, in that no incentive is provided for the individual to take personal responsibility under such circumstances and that the effect of such a system, no matter how lofty the ideals which gave birth to it, would always be ‘antimoral.’ (Hayek, 2001, pp.217-218) Hayek’s modern counterpart might advocate the privatisation of the water services in this case, arguing that, when customers are forced to pay according to the amount of water they consume, they will no longer be so ready to waste the resource. While this may be true on some level, it misses a fundamental point, which is that it does not stimulate personal responsibility at all; it merely replaces one form of coercion (that of state intervention, in this case, to restrict the availability of the water supply) with another form—the ‘invisible hand’ of the market. In fact, rather than fostering a sense of individual responsibility, such coercion by the market tends to define social irresponsibly as a desirable commodity to be aspired to by a privileged few, in that the higher one’s income is, the higher one’s capacity to waste water. A similar criticism has been levelled at the logic behind carbon trading. (Lohmann, 1999)
THE CULTURAL CONSEQUENCES OF NEOLIBERALISM
While it has often been contended that state intervention has a corrosive effect on personal responsibility, what has been less remarked upon is the consequences for civic responsibility resulting from the laissez-faire economic model. By this, I do not refer to the behavioural patterns that result from economic incentives, but rather those which result from the cultural consequences of neoliberalism. Accepting that neither state nor market intervention do much to promote responsibility raises the possibility that these ends are not brought about by political or economic systems at all, but that their presence or absence is in fact a cultural phenomenon. This in itself suggests the question: what kind of cultural conditions does the free-market create, and what effect do these conditions have on the way people relate to the society around them? Given that many have, in the past, benefited from publicly-funded enterprises, why are they now so unwilling to pay for them? It may be on account of a perception that taxes raised are not being utilised in the public’s interest, or that inefficiency and overspending are problems endemic to publicly-funded services. Support for this impression has come in Ireland from the state itself, by a succession of ministers anxious to cut spending on the health service. There may, however, be something more irrational taking place here—a belief which has not come about as a result of experience with taxes, but instead reflects a deeper scepticism towards public spending in principle. It is not in the form of a political theory that this ideology (it is, nevertheless, an ideology) has tended to filter through to the public consciousness. Instead it has had its most lasting impact through the medium of advertising and consumerism—a world-view which place’s the individual and his or her interests above all else.
An example of this is the apparently growing belief amongst motorists that cyclists have less rights on the roads because they do not pay road tax. The fact that this is inaccurate (car-owners pay motor tax for their vehicles and cyclists contribute their share towards maintenance of the roads in general taxation) is irrelevant; it is the logic of the assertion which is telling—that payment of taxes is akin to a specific fee for the specific service, only available to those who can afford it. (Walker, 2010) This attests to a fundamental misunderstanding of the principle of public spending and taxation; it is the mentality not of the citizen but of the consumer. This is only one of many areas in which the mindset of consumerism has left many ill-equipped to understand basic economic concepts. This has become particularly apparent from the public response in many western societies to the financial crisis of the last few years. It is in such a context of bewilderment and anger that the Tea Party movement has grown to prominence in the United States. Espousing a free-market brand of Libertarianism and borrowing much of its rhetoric from positions as radical as anarcho-capitalism, it represents in essence a more populist and strident version of the neoliberal views which have become orthodox amongst the ruling elite in America since the introduction of Reaganomics in the eighties. Despite the fact that lack of regulation has led to some of the worst excesses which brought about the financial crisis, the Tea Party’s driving aspiration seems to be less regulation and interference by government and the liberation of an entrepreneurial spirit which, it is believed, will bring the economy out of recession. This is an essentially negative theory in that it defines freedom as the mere absence of constraint, rather than proposing any positive measures to enable people to exercise their freedom. There is, in fact, good reason to believe that the Tea Party is little more than a campaigning platform for the Republican party, disguising itself as a grassroots political movement as it seeks to reinvigorate itself in the aftermath of electoral defeat to Barack Obama, (Krugman, 2009) and that, while commandeering the language of freedom, it actually represents a blueprint for society which favours rule by business interests ahead of the state—in other words, more of the same. Indeed, Noam Chomsky has likened its potential attractiveness to a beleaguered population to that of Nazism in 1920s Germany. (Rothschild, 2010) It is interesting to compare the public response to this latest crisis of capitalism in the west and in Latin America. In the relatively affluent nations of the west (or rather 'the North' as this socio-political block is more often referred to in Latin America) the population has, ostensibly, greater access to information and educational resources than the poorer classes of central and south America. It is nevertheless amongst the latter that a coherent ideological resistance to the neoliberal paradigm has emerged and a vigorous political alternative from grassroots movements in countries such as Venezuela and Bolivia. (Eckstein, 2001) On the other hand, it is tempting to see the higher levels of 'education' in the west, especially in the managerial stratum of society, as at least partly representing higher levels of indoctrination. As Chomsky has observed, propaganda is largely directed towards the privileged; for the mass of the population, there is distraction in the form of sports, celebrities, etc. (Chomsky, 2005) An example of this indoctrination, to which children are exposed from an early age is the cult of the entrepreneur. This has been promoted for some time in both the media and official government policy. So prevalent has it become in western popular culture that it goes almost unnoticed.
The ideology of movements such as the Tea Party is also informed by the notion that economic growth is stimulated primarily by unleashing the inner forces of enterprise which government can only provide an obstacle to. An emphasis on self-reliance and personal development dovetails neatly with the neoliberal economic programme for obvious reasons, and has been manifested in popular culture in other, less obvious ways. The growing interest in new-age religion (in varying degrees of dedication) is an interesting example of this. It has borrowed selectively from Buddhism and Hinduism to stress the importance of the individual and his or her control over their own fate. Filtered through western capitalism, the concept of karma can be made to lend a spiritual legitimacy to what appears a rather cut-throat doctrine; it also provides a comforting organising principle in a world where the individual’s fate often appears far from in their own hands. This tendency to direct energies towards personal instead of social transformation can be traced to the post-Nixon years in America, when that politically-active segment of the hippie movement grew disenchanted with the possibility of changing America politically, and focussed instead on fulfilling the dictates of Gandhi’s oft-quoted direction to be the change you wish to see in the world. (Curtis, 2002) The extent to which this disposition has entered the popular consciousness is reflected in the huge sales of self-help books, many of which preach some sort of new-age beliefs alongside a surprisingly materialist ethos. Titles such as Attract money by best-selling author Robert Griswold and Think Yourself Rich by Joseph Murphy, attest to the correlation. Poverty, the latter writer insisted, is a disease of the mind. (Murphy, 2006, p.121) |