Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Catching Covid Does Not Lower Your IQ Tue Jul 23, 2024 09:00 | Noah Carl
Headlines earlier this year proclaimed that catching Covid may knock up to 6 points off your IQ. A new study punctures this claim: there was no decline in cognitive test scores after Covid infection.
The post Catching Covid Does Not Lower Your IQ appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The BBC Has ?Fact-Checked? Labour?s Claim that Renewables are Cheaper than Fossil Fuels and Declared... Tue Jul 23, 2024 07:00 | Paul Homewood
The BBC has ?fact-checked? Labour's claim that a unit of power from a new solar or wind project is cheaper than the cost from a new gas generator and found it to be true. But it's false, says Paul Homewood.
The post The BBC Has ?Fact-Checked? Labour?s Claim that Renewables are Cheaper than Fossil Fuels and Declared it to be True. But it?s False appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Jul 23, 2024 01:16 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Will Trump Ever Admit Lockdown Was a Mistake? Mon Jul 22, 2024 19:35 | Jeffrey A. Tucker
Will Trump ever admit he was wrong to back lockdown in March 2020 ? a decision that doomed America to years of crisis and sank his re-election hopes that year? Jeffrey Tucker is hopeful that truth will finally prevail.
The post Will Trump Ever Admit Lockdown Was a Mistake? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Joe Biden Out in Apparent Palace Coup Mon Jul 22, 2024 17:30 | Eugyppius
Biden's team was still obliviously tweeting his resolve to fight on hours after he had decided to step down. So was the matter taken out of his hands? It has all the signs of an opportunistic palace coup, says Eugyppius.
The post Joe Biden Out in Apparent Palace Coup appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (12 of 12)
Jump To Comment: 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1My misprint.
Expanded Sea ice shrinks back to the volume of ocean water when it melts.
Melted sea ice does not expand the sea.
Greenland and Antarctica are up on dry land.
When their ice melts the volume of extra water in sea the will be about 90% of the original ice volume on land.
If that happens coastal people will need a new Noah in his Ark.
..you mean the 90% of the ICECAP.
I think 90% of icebergs tends to be BELOW the waterline.
but aside from the global warming argument, our using the oceans and atmosphere as dumps is having other consequences that might well hit long before sea levels become a problem. The destruction of corals and mangroves, globally, is destroying the nurseries that underpin already depleted fish stocks. The poisoniong of the Mexican Gulf and the preparations to hit the Arctic Ocean with the same oil-race do not bode well.
Maybe we should pile all these extractive corporations onto a fleet of shuttles and shoot them home to Mars. If we painted a dart board on the surface we could let the nuclear lunatics fire away till the arsenal was shot. But they'd probably enjoy the gig so much they'd go up and start firing back.
Subject:
Not Warm Water.
The Subject is melting ice.
"Our analyses do not indicate acceleration in sea level in U.S. tide gauge records."
Warm objects expand a bit.
Not much.
But only melting ice will raise the sea levels catastropiclly.
The extreme thermal expansion which busts your pipes occurs during a chemical reaction called melting.
The 90% of the iceberg which is over the sea sinks back when it melts and expands the sea.
The melting of Greenland will innundate Dublin.
(Not to mention the horror story if Antarctia decides to melt.)
Peer-reviewed Scientific Paper: “worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years”
The results are stunning for their contradiction to AGW theories which suggest global warming would accelerate sea level rise during the last century.
Sea-Level Acceleration Based on U.S. Tide Gauges and Extensions of Previous Global-Gauge Analyses - http://www.jcronline.org/doi/abs/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10...157.1
J. R. Houston - Director Emeritus, Engineer Research and Development Center, Corps of Engineers, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, and R. G. Dean - Professor Emeritus, Department of Civil and Coastal Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A
Published in - Journal of Coastal Research
Abstract
Conclusion:
FULL PAPER avialable here: http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10...157.1 (PDF)
Full article at url below.
Lord Lawson's 'misleading' climate claims challenged by scientific adviser
Tory peer accused of using 'meaningless' comparisons to try to make his argument against the need to tackle global warming
Lord Lawson, the former chancellor, has been privately accused by the government's chief scientific adviser of making "incorrect" and "misleading" claims in his book on climate change.
The charge against Lawson, the country's most prominent global-warming sceptic, was made during an extraordinary and at times fractious exchange of letters between the men following a meeting over coffee at the Lords.
Sir John Beddington wrote to Lawson to tell him that his book, An Appeal to Reason: A Cool Look at Global Warming, had made "a number of points related to the underlying science of climate change that are incorrect or presented in a misleading way". An appendix to his letter accused Lawson of making "meaningless" comparisons to prove his thesis.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/27/lord-...viser
Thats an interesting link. Not saying I'm convinced but its real argument. Calling Hansen a Quack is not. It only devalues your case.
So 2010 was the warmest year? Does anyone else living in the real world think that is true? It was the hottest by +0.01 degrees according to Warmist Quack Jim Hansen. His claim has been spread wide in the press but most real scientists not in the pay of the IPCC do not agree him. Hansen is well know for making exaggerated and disproven claims of catastrophic global warming. The following document debunks his 'Warmest Year' rubbish, using the same data which he manipulated to generate his bedwetting claim.
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers...r.pdf
When they were building the Suez Canal people fretted that the Indian Ocean was higher than the water in the Med. and that Rome and Athens might be flooded.
The builder of the Suez Canal Ferdinand De'Lessup sneered this:
"Some people don't understand the law of gravity."
Different story today.
If the Greenland ice melts both Dublin and Cork really will be submerged.
Ferdinand would agree.
..in Queensland were fed by exceptionally warm ocean surface temperatures associated with the El Nino/La Nina cycles in the Pacific.
Given that Queensland is a major coal supplier to China you'd be tempted to join the dots. But the locus of the blowback is just coincidence. It also hit Sri Lanka and rippled as far as Brazil.
And as the Arctic icecap retreats they follow it with drilling crews. Homo-too-fucking-clever-by-half.
Full article at url.
An international research team has compared the hot summers of 2003 and 2010 in detail for the first time. Last year’s heatwave across Eastern Europe and Russia was unprecedented in every respect: Europe has never experienced so large summer temperature anomalies in the last 500 years.
The summer of 2010 was extreme. Russia was especially hard hit by the extraordinary heat: in Moscow, daytime temperatures of 38.2°C were recorded and it didn’t get much cooler at night. Devastating fires caused by the dry conditions covered an area of 1 million hectares, causing crop failures of around 25%; the total damage ran to about USD 15 billion. Even though passengers were also collapsing on trains in Germany in 2010 because the air-con units had failed in the heat, the general perception is still that the summer of 2003 was the most extreme – among Western Europeans at least. An international research team involving ETH Zurich has now compared the two heatwaves and just published their findings in Science.
The 2010 heatwave (see at the right side of this picture) shattered all the records in terms of the deviation from the average temperatures. Credit: ETH Zürich
On a related scientific theme people might be interested in what happened off the coast of Japan.
A section of the Earth's crust plunged downwards under another section of the crust.
This heaved the upper section upwards.
The ocean above heaved upwards with it ,creating the unimaginable waves.
The oceanic crust which plunged downwards increased the average density of the earth relative to its radius,very slightly.
Like a spinning ice skater rotates faster as she lowers her arms to her sides, mother earth also rotated a bit faster.
(A few microseconds faster every day. No need to adjust the clocks.)
The North pole moved by a few meters as the earth wobbled.
So if you were planting your flag in the North Pole as the 'quake struck...you missed!
(T'was ever thus. The American Appalation Mountains and the Ozasks and the Connemara and Scottish and Norwegian mountains once formed a single chain.)
Fad Fado Fado.
I'm not sure it would be such a bad thing if the earth warmed up a bit, or is anyone else getting tired of this damned cold? When Greenland was an estimated 5 degrees warmer there were lush forests and butterflies. I like butterflies a lot more than lying scientists and ecomaniacs!