Upcoming Events

International | Animal Rights

no events match your query!

New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Slavery Did Not Make Britain Rich, Report Finds Wed May 01, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones
Slavery and colonialism did not make Britain rich, and may even have made the nation poorer, a new study from the Institute of Economic Affairs has found.
The post Slavery Did Not Make Britain Rich, Report Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Government Caught Playing Hardball Over Vaccine Injury Payouts as Victims? Legal Bills Mount Wed May 01, 2024 17:00 | Will Jones
The Government has been caught shamefully playing hardball with the victims of Covid vaccine injuries, refusing to settle payouts despite devastating harms, as legal bills mount.
The post Government Caught Playing Hardball Over Vaccine Injury Payouts as Victims’ Legal Bills Mount appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link How to Say ?NO!? to Clearly Crazy Policy Ideas Wed May 01, 2024 15:18 | Joanna Gray
This is how we should respond to clearly crazy policy ideas, says Joanna Gray. Like a streetwise woman in a nightclub who spots a chancer coming and stops him in his tracks, we all just need to say "NO!"
The post How to Say “NO!” to Clearly Crazy Policy Ideas appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link EV Battery Timebomb Wed May 01, 2024 13:09 | Sallust
Many EVs will lose up to 12% of their charge capacity by six years and some may lose even more, research has found, leading one expert to warn customers to be wary of buying a used electric car beyond eight years.
The post EV Battery Timebomb appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Historical Significance of Humza Yousaf Wed May 01, 2024 11:00 | James Alexander
The real significance of Humza Yousaf is that he was the first leader of a British country to be a practising Muslim, says politics professor Dr James Alexander.
The post The Historical Significance of Humza Yousaf appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Paris 2024 and Berlin 1936 in the service of an impossible imperial dream, by Th... Tue Apr 30, 2024 07:07 | en

offsite link Georgia and the financing of political organizations from abroad Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:37 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°84 Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:35 | en

offsite link Israel's complex relations with Iran, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:25 | en

offsite link Iran's hypersonic missiles generate deterrence through terror, says Scott Ritter... Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:37 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Another repression of the animal liberation movement?

category international | animal rights | opinion/analysis author Sunday October 24, 2010 00:33author by Mi cke y - !Liberate! Report this post to the editors

At the end of August Time.com published an article containing a controversial opinion of co-founder of the most popular organization fighting (supposedly) for animal rights – Ingrid Newkirk. Mrs President, said, inter alia, that “Absolute purists should be living in a cave.” In the ranks of the activists PETA has been regarded as the organization which in no way improve the lot of animals. After another raid someone may even be tempted to declare that the organization becomes harmful, because denying ethical considerations justifies the same industry which is responsible for the holocaust of the animals. This in turn leads to the construction of the belief that everything is really okay, we should eat animals, we just need to kill them a bit more gently. This way, Burger King customers will soon become defenders of the animals. Anyway Gary L. Francione issued an excellent response to Mrs. Newkirk views. I urge you to read it to understand fully what I mean.

On the one hand, we have an apparent desire to make changes represented by the creators of popular NGOs and on the second hand we observe reinforcing the repression against those who try to make real changes. This is particularly evident in the United States, where not so long ago, Walter Bond was arrested, accused of carrying out direct action under the Animal Liberation Front. By the way as it turned out that FBI informant, who delivered information about Walter Bond, was his brother. Shortly after the FBI raid took place at the house of well-known activist Peter Young, who runs a website dedicated to animal rights Voice of the Voiceless. And from other reports, we can learn about the secret meeting of the companies involved in violence against animals, which is to be devoted to “extremists fighting for animal rights.” To make matters worse a few days ago it emerged that Monsanto hired a Blackwater, which is responsible among others for the crimes committed in Iraq, to spying on the eco and animal rights movements. The measures taken by businesses are becoming more repressive, which may indicate a growing fear of the consequences of activists actions. Especially, thanks to publicity they gain, animal rights issues get to the commercial media, hitting the mass audience. And this is a problem for companies that are part of the industry exploiting animals. They are happy to condone the existence of such organizations as conformist PETA , but do everything they can to harm those who strive for true liberation of animals. These companies are very afraid that their customers can see the truth about the production of food, clothing or other products of animal origin. Less consumption means lower profits. And thanks to the support of the state officials they criminalize those who fight for a right cause, accusing them of absurd allegations (eg, terrorism), at same time pursuing the policy of absolute cruelty to other beings.

Increased repression is often a symbol of the growing strength of the movement. Similar mechanisms can be found in history or even in modern times (the Zapatistas, Greek anarchists). Capitalist thinking instilled to managers and employees of big business is not able to understand a completely different thought, based on ethics, not a selfish point of view. This does not mean, however, that this thought may be stifled by intimidation or pressure from the state forces. The more repression, the more resistance. The more terror, the greater will to act. This in turn may result in increasing the strength and commitment of the people in the struggle for animal liberation. In the broad outline, also in a political struggle, which I personally link to the animals issues as the whole movement must become a part of it. Social revolution (in which the animal rights are the key issue) instead of ineffective reforms or welfare can ensure the animals freedom and respect.

Sources:
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/links/p3443/a...n.pdf
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ingrid-newkirk-on-p...iple/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/alf-lone-wolf-arrest...torm/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/breaking-fbi-raids-u...time/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/leaked-document-reve...reat/
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=201009182110...05427

Related Link: http://mrkruk.wordpress.com
author by V for vendettapublication date Sun Oct 24, 2010 21:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You know perfectly well that people don't go from a condition of little or no awareness directly to radical / revolutionary

PETA, by playing the corporations own media and celebrity games, are achieving awareness of animal issues on a large scale. Because of this, they are considered a much bigger threat than ALF to the status quo. That is why they are targetted

That is why vested interests would like nothing more than for PETA to be rejected by other animal rights groups. Divide and conquer is the game of the corporations. Don't fall for it. Many of those people who PETA gets through to will go on to a deeper awareness.

There is no reason why all groups can't proceed on all levels in parallel. There is no reason why different approaches can't be tried. Not everyone is amenable to a radical or revolutionary approach. In fact very few are. Largely because of the very tools used successfully by corporate interests. Tools that PETA is now using against them, and quite successfully.

No, Not everyone is amenable to to radical or revolutionary change. (The small number that are can be easily smeared and neutralised.) It's naive to think they are.

Or perhaps it's not so naive? Perhaps it's something else at work here?

author by Jorgpublication date Mon Oct 25, 2010 00:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I think most of your comments is correct. Only one thing. It depends on what you define as a revolutionary change. Contemporary revolutionary thought puts a large extent on education, not a sudden change, which could lead to disaster. Only conscious society can accept radical changes.

The thing with PETA is, that yes, they managed to attract the attention of people using photos with naked chicks or Pamela Anderson involvment in their campaigns but at the end of day it didn't give expected effects. The welfare reforms have failed. Also you can't be against torture, while accepting a lighter form of torture. As Francione's said:

"The reforms that are promoted by PETA and the other new welfarist groups for the most part do not provide significant welfare benefits for animals. They just represent a different form of torture. Waterboarding someone on a bare board and waterboarding them on a padded board is still waterboarding. "

However, of course, I agree with you, there should be different methods of struggle against the exploitation of animals, not just direct action.

 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy