North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Fri Nov 29, 2024 01:17 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Only Psychological Therapy Could Cure Long Covid, Major BMJ Study Finds Thu Nov 28, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones Psychological therapy may be the only treatment to successfully cure lingering 'Long Covid' symptoms, landmark new research in the BMJ has suggested.
The post Only Psychological Therapy Could Cure Long Covid, Major BMJ Study Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Backlash as Cows Given Synthetic Additive in Feed to Hit Net Zero Thu Nov 28, 2024 17:00 | Will Jones Europe's biggest dairy company Arla is facing a backlash after giving cows Bovaer, a synthetic additive to their feed in an?attempt to cut their methane emissions as part of the Net Zero drive.
The post Backlash as Cows Given Synthetic Additive in Feed to Hit Net Zero appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Trump Appoints Lockdown Sceptic Jay Bhattacharya to Head National Institutes of Health Thu Nov 28, 2024 15:10 | Will Jones Donald Trump has appointed Jay Bhattacharya, a prominent lockdown sceptic and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, to lead the National Institutes of Health.
The post Trump Appoints Lockdown Sceptic Jay Bhattacharya to Head National Institutes of Health appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is There a Right to Die? Thu Nov 28, 2024 13:00 | James Alexander Is there a right to die? As the Assisted Dying Bill vote looms, Prof James Alexander ponders the issues, asking if the whole debate would change if we think of it in terms of duties instead of rights.
The post Is There a Right to Die? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Russia Prepares to Respond to the Armageddon Wanted by the Biden Administration ... Tue Nov 26, 2024 06:56 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?109 Fri Nov 22, 2024 14:00 | en
Joe Biden and Keir Starmer authorize NATO to guide ATACMS and Storm Shadows mis... Fri Nov 22, 2024 13:41 | en
Donald Trump, an Andrew Jackson 2.0? , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Nov 19, 2024 06:59 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?108 Sat Nov 16, 2024 07:06 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
IPSC condemns Irish expenditure on Israeli military equipment
national |
rights, freedoms and repression |
press release
Sunday April 04, 2010 15:37 by Fintan Lane - IPSC media officer 087 1258325
IRELAND-PALESTINE SOLIDARITY CAMPAIGN
PRESS RELEASE, 4/1/10
IPSC demands an end to Irish Defence Forces expenditure on Israeli arms
The Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) is reiterating its call on the Irish Department of Defence to end all spending on equipment and armaments manufactured by Israeli firms. This comes in the wake of the further exposure in today's Sunday Tribune of the extent of Irish army spending on Israeli equipment.
There is an ongoing international human rights campaign - called for by Palestinian civil society - of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against the apartheid Israeli state. The IPSC is at the forefront of this campaign in Ireland and regularly organises events in support of BDS.
According to today's Sunday Tribune, the Irish army has spent almost €14 million in the past five years on equipment made by Israeli manufacturers. One company that has received Irish taxpayers' money is Israeli company Elbit Systems, which has lucrative contracts with the Israeli military and provides surveillance equipment for the notorious apartheid wall in the West Bank. Last September, Norway divested its pension fund investments in Elbit Systems due to ethical concerns over its work on the West Bank separation wall.
The IPSC is calling on the Irish government to end on all contracts and connections with Israeli companies, and also reiterates its demand that the Irish army should not purchase bullets from Israel.
According to IPSC chairperson Dr David Landy: "The recent revelation that the Irish Government is considering purchasing millions of euros worth of bullets from Israel Military Industries is deeply shocking. It is also hugely disturbing that the Irish army has dealings with a company such as Elbit Systems which is deeply involved in providing the surveillence infrastructure for the apartheid wall in the West Bank. We find it completely inappropriate that the Irish State would purchase weapons and equipment from companies intimately linked to the Israeli armed forces, esppecially those that supply the means by which the war crimes documented by the Goldstone Report are committed. Furthermore, we feel that, at a time when Israel is facing unprecedented criticism for its continued defiance of international law, such a purchase of arms sends entirely the wrong message to the Israeli state and the international community."
He continued: "The extent of Irish army expenditure on Israeli military equipment is disturbing and, on the face of it, appears to reveal a disconnent between the Department of Defence and the Department of Foreigns Affairs. In recent months, Michael Martin has been forthrightly condemnatory of the Israeli siege of Gaza, yet our own army is allowed to fund the Israeli arms industry to the tune of millions of euros. This is unacceptable. Not a single penny of Irish taxpayers' money should be used to bolster the rogue Israeli state."
PRESS RELEASE ENDS
For further information, phone Dr David Landy (IPSC chairperson) at XXXXX, or Dr Fintan Lane (IPSC media officer) at 087 1258325.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4ALL TRADE between EU states and Israel should cease immediately in view of the alleged war crimes committed in Gaza and the cover-up by the Israeli military. That should include dealing with Israeli companies registered in EU member states.
Terrorizing the civilian population in Gaza by the killing of non-combatants is a crime under international law.
The dropping of hundreds of thousands of illegal cluster bombs in southern Lebanon was a deliberate action to permanently contaminate the country, and was also a war crime. 90% of these bombs were dropped after the cease-fire agreed with the UN.
The world cannot continue to deal with a state that continues to act in this barbarous manner and then has the audacity to claim to be democratic.
If this is the case then Ireland should not trade with the us or Britain!!!
But in under law Ireland has to tender contracts and take the best price. If an isreali company has the best offer then the defence forces are obliged to take it!
Hi Mark, in fact there is no legal obligation to buy arms from Israel. I'm not surprised you think there is, because this is the line our government puts out. The department. of foreign affairs, whenever we or TDs have asked questions about their purchase of Israeli arms always use the fact that they are 'obliged to' use the EDA Code of Conduct on Defence Procurement, (and under this code there's no reason not to buy weapons from Israel).
However this is simply incorrect - the code is explicitly a "voluntary, non-binding agreement" which involves "no legal commitment", and states that "in all cases, the final authority for contract award remains with [member states'] national authorities". Furthermore, the Code is an agreement between EU member states, not including Israel, with the declared aim of maximizing opportunities for "suppliers based on each others' territories". On no interpretation can this agreement be presented as compelling Ireland to open its procurement competitions to any Israeli arms company. Companies excluded from the outset incur no costs in tendering, and thus have no legal cause of action.
What this boils down to is that our government is buying bullets from Israel because it wants to, not because it's legally obliged to.
While I dont disagree that they are a less than savoury bidder I do wonder if you would support spending more tax payers money to buy from the second cheapest bidder? (Presuming of course that the decision was based purely on cost, it may well have been based on the product itself for all I know)