The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Wanted: Climate Researcher to Write Extreme Weather Just-So Stories to Serve Up to Credulous Media Wed Jul 24, 2024 07:00 | Chris Morrison
If you wondered where the MSM get all their lurid stories attributing 'extreme weather' to climate change, look no further than a new job ad for a "researcher" focused on creating alarmist propaganda, says Chris Morrison.
The post Wanted: Climate Researcher to Write Extreme Weather Just-So Stories to Serve Up to Credulous Media appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Wed Jul 24, 2024 01:01 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Porsche Scraps Electric Car Targets as Demand Slumps Tue Jul 23, 2024 19:43 | Will Jones
Porsche has scrapped its sales targets for EVs amid a slump in demand. A previous goal of 80% by 2030 has been watered down and the company now says sales will depend on uptake and how the technology develops.
The post Porsche Scraps Electric Car Targets as Demand Slumps appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Mission-Driven? Government is the Antithesis of Liberty Tue Jul 23, 2024 17:30 | Dr David McGrogan
Labour is "mission-driven", says Keir Starmer. But the last thing anyone should want is a Government with a mission, says David McGrogan. That's because a Government with a mission needs conscripts. That's you and me.
The post “Mission-Driven” Government is the Antithesis of Liberty appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Victory! Hospitals That Brought Back Mask Mandates Backtrack After Complaints Tue Jul 23, 2024 15:30 | Dr Gary Sidley
A victory in the mask wars! Two hospital providers that brought back mask mandates have backtracked and scrapped them following complaints from Daily Sceptic readers and Smile Free supporters.
The post Victory! Hospitals That Brought Back Mask Mandates Backtrack After Complaints appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6I would suggest that the strike ballot was not voted down. 65% of those balloted were in favour. It is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules by which a 2/3 majority is needed to pass a strike ballot that is to blame.
It is far too simplistic to conclude that workers in IMPACT did not vote overwhelmingly for the National Strike because of their Trade Union 'leaders'. As much as I am disappointed that it was not carried I am not hugely surprised. It is futile blaming the leaders. A more detailed and nuanced analysis is required if we genuinely want to build a successful labour movement in the current crisis. It is building this movement of labour, aimed at a complete restructuring of the societal organisation of work that is important. To achieve it there has to be an honest evaluation of the Irish labour force.
Public sector workers (particularly civil servants) are extremely conservative. Public sector unions reflect this political conservativism. They generally view themselves as service providers, and reflect the hierarchical nature of public sector organisations. Horizontal organisation is the absolute opposite of how this sector operates. Public sector workers are used to a situation whereby they passively allow their 'leaders' make decisions for them. This is not the fault of the trade union leaders; it is a reflection of how they operate in their day to day workplace. Their members pay a fee and they bargain for better wages. They are not remotely interested in workplace democracy and certainly not interested in a full blown class struggle. Anybody who has experience of the trade union movement will be fully aware of this conservativism.
Political studies have conclusively shown that public sector workers vote overwhelmingly for Fianna Fail, and have done so for over twenty five years. The most that public sector workers will contribute toward class-struggle is shifting their electorate preference toward Labour (hardly radical). But, it is a reflection of the political consciousness of the Irish public sector. The fact that 40 % did not turn out to vote in the IMPACT ballot speaks more than the 65% who did vote. Overall, less than 40 per cent can be accurately said to have voted for strike action. The harsh reality is that whilst the pension levy is extremely inequitable it does not hugely affect the upper echelons of the public sector. Middle managers whilst disappointed that they have lost disposable income are not so pissed off that they want an all out strike. They recognise they have a relatively secure job (and I exclude any new teachers, and those employed over the past 24 months etc from this 'security) and will most likely express their 'class consciousness' through the ballot box by voting Fianna Fail out of office. This is about the full extent of 'radicalism' we can expect from a huge section of the public sector workforce.
The rejection of participation in a national strike by IMPACT members is now a social fact and it is more important to build support in sectors of the Irish workforce that will favour a national strike.
On a more theoretical level: The real position which differentiates me from traditional Marxist analyses of 'class struggle' is my conviction that even with the methods of the classical critique of political economy, we cannot make precise economic predictions today: for these presuppose an autonomous, self-reproducing economic system. Just because capitalism is in crisis and is contracting it does not mean that workers will inevitably collectively favour an anti-capitalist outcome. I do not believe in a Marxist self-reproducing system that informs most 'class-struggle' analyses. The laws governing the contemporary economy are no longer identical with those analysed by Marx. This does not mean that his analysis of its mechanisms is inaccurate, but rather that this analysis only remains valid so long as the intervention of the political system is ignored. The political system will not ignore the capitalist crisis. In the 1930's we ended up with Fascism in Germany and the New Deal in the US not a classless society.
The state will mediate class struggle and diversify its effects. The lines of battle have been fundamentally restructured over the past 50 years. The classical arch-type form of class struggle is not a useful tool for the contemporary situation we are in. We need new analyses if we want to build a new Labour movement. We need new tools, new strategies and new analysis. Blaming IMPACT leaders for the failure of their members to participate in a national strike is rhetorical and not useful if we really want to build change.
Please note that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action. CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action.
Both 'Hackett' and 'A.R' are talking crap! The fact is that as 'Albatrot' and 'Jerry Cornelius' have already pointed out had you bothered to read their comments is that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action Hardly sounds like rejection to me 'Hackett' and 'A.R'. That's A MAJORITY to me, and a large majority too! Also SIPTU, TEEU, CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action. That's lots of Unions represting MANY different groups of Workers, BOTH Public AND Private Sector Workers. March 30th IS GOING Ahead, EVEN IF ICTU do stab us in the back. Unofficially if necessary, and maybe that's not a bad thing as it'll free us from the cancer of conservative Trade Union leaders. Roll on next Monday.
Approximately 5,000 members didn't even receive ballot papers. Some were'nt even informed of next Monday. Impact were reliant on a passive membership and when the union leadership had to deliver results to Congress they proved they couldnt muster up that result.
If everyone had been balloted properly the result would have been different. But posters have been accurate. Impact did not reject the strike. There was a fraction of 1% below the required 2/3. Indymedia is assisting the main stream media by repeating the same guff that Impact rejected the strike and implying that there isn't wide support for strike action. 35% were opposed to industrial action. That does not mean that Impact members are not in favour of strike action, thay just didn't hit that 66% rule. So look a little bit behind the facts to get to the truth.
Albitrot’s claim that it “is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules” that is to blame is actually another reason for supporting my view that the leadership of IMPACT is the problem of the working class. It is the reason the vote for strike action turned out as it did and as to why the union has a bureaucratic undemocratic character.
AR’s criticism of the conservative nature of IMPACT as a union supports my very claim that the leadership of IMPACT is responsible for the failure of the union to reach its two thirds majority to get the motion for strike action through. And if it is true that around five thousand of its members received no ballot papers, as one contributor by the pseudonym “Impact member” suggests, then this constitutes further evidence of the correctness of my claim that the leadership is reactionary and needs to be replaced.