Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political Sat Jan 11, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl Science, nominally the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, is at it again. In November, they published an editorial saying that scientists need to be even more political than they already are.
The post Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure Sat Jan 11, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones BlackRock, the world's biggest asset manager, is abandoning the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative after coming under pressure from Republican politicians over its support for woke climate policies.
The post BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle Sat Jan 11, 2025 13:00 | Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson write about the appalling treatment of Covid vaccine whistleblower Dr Byram Bridle, the Canadian immunologist who was removed from duties for raising the alarm about the vaccine.
The post The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?High Chance? Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts Sat Jan 11, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones There is a "high chance" that Rachel Reeves will be forced to announce emergency?spending cuts?this spring, Barclay's Chief Economist has said, as borrowing costs surged again on Friday.
The post “High Chance” Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine Sat Jan 11, 2025 09:00 | Dr Copernicus Dr. Daniel Armstrong has had his name erased from the U.K. Medical Register and been barred from practice for making a video in which he argued that the Covid vaccines are unsafe, untested and cause harm.
The post Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Message from the South East: "No means No"
national |
eu |
press release
Tuesday June 17, 2008 14:49 by O. O'C. - People's Movement (South East Region) info at selisboninfo dot org 086 3150301
If respect for the equality of all EU Member States is to mean anything more than rhetoric, then the general ratification process should have been halted immediately.
Nearly seventy seven thousand voters in the South East Counties of Carlow, Kilkenny, Wexford and Waterford voted No in last Thursday’s Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Just over sixty seven thousand voted Yes. Yet already a process is under way to try to overturn the democratically expressed majority will of the people of this region and of the rest of the State. That is effectively what EU Commission President Barroso, French President Sarkozy, German Chancellor Merkel and British Prime Minister Brown mean when they say that the Lisbon Treaty ratification process must continue despite the Irish referendum vote.
If respect for the equality of all EU Member States is to mean anything more than rhetoric, then the general ratification process should have been halted immediately. For the treaty to come into force, all Member States must be in a position to ratify it according to their individual constitutional requirements and this State is not in a position to ratify the treaty in compliance with the Irish Constitution.
The Commission and the big Member States are already ganging up on Ireland over the referendum result yet a post-Lisbon EU would see those same Member States having a much greater influence in the EU law-making and decision taking processes and Ireland having much less.
The ratification process for the Lisbon Treaty was programmed to guarantee that all the Member States would ratify it. Although in essence a Constitution for a new European Union it was deliberately not called such to ensure that EU governments could slither out of holding a referendum on it for fear that voters would reject it again as they had done to its predecessor in France and Holland in 2005. Ireland has upset the programme because it is the only country where a referendum had to be held because of the 1987 Supreme Court decision in the Crotty case.
In order to lay the ground for overturning the popular will on Lisbon, the leaders of the Yes camp arrogantly set out to rubbish the integrity and intelligence of the No majority and portray it as being made up of the ill-informed, the duped and the unthinkingly discontented. Yet what did No voters reject?
By voting No, voters rejected major constitutional changes for the EU, for its Member States and for Irish citizens. These changes would have given the EU the constitutional form of a supranational European Federal State and turned Ireland and other Member States into regions or provinces of such a Federation. These changes were clear to see in the 28th Amendment to the Constitution but were either glossed over , misrepresented or downplayed by the Yes camp and even more crucially by the allegedly impartial Referendum Commission.
In spite of this, voters made a perfectly rational political decision to reject the Lisbon Treaty. Now that decision has to be respected.
The message from the South East is thus, No Means No.
FOR VERIFICATION AND COMMENT, CONTACT:
KEVIN MCCORRY
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3We can see the direction the yes camp and the EU are going. I believe if they try to force this treaty on us and demonise us make us out to be idiots, we should mobilise mass demonstrations in Dublin.
It is our democratic right to say NO . we the majority have said NO... Invite supporters from all over Europe to join us, those people who have been sidelined by their own goverments. I believe it what has to happen. When they see thousands of people on the streets they have to take notice... NOISY BUT PEACEFUL..... LETS DO IT
You've instigated a two-tier Europe in which Ireland will now rest in the "go slow" lane affecting our economy and our previously close relations with the European Project. The NO camp has no direction in which to go now except more of this isolationist drivel and left-wing rhetoric.
You wanna talk about democracy? The hard left were rejected by the electorate in the General Election and now it's just used Lisbon to further it's (now undemocratic) aims.
After all the lies and bullying of the campaign before the vote, we
now have to endure the lies about why we voted "No".
How can Brian Cowen and his colleagues explain to Brussels why the
Irish voted No, when at no stage did they listen to us?
Will he just try to blame it all on fringe elements worried about
abortion and gay marriage? That's neither honest nor credible.
I am not Anti-European, and most of Ireland is pro-European, but we're
not foolish enough to think everything drafted in Brussels is good.
This is especially true when we see the other 496 million Europeans
denied a referendum on this issue.
We have only the late Raymond Crotty to thank for the fact that we got to vote on this.
Otherwise our government would have voted on it long ago, against our wishes.
If the EU wants to re-organise it's institutions, that seems logical.
I could see the point of having a treaty about the number of commissioners and qualified majority voting.
There was NO good reason to include in the same treaty, sneaky conditions requiring us to upgrade our military equipment, amendments about privatisation, supporting the nuclear industry, and half -baked 'sweeteners' about accountability that didn't survive a minute of scrutiny.
It was a bad deal for the ordinary citizen and tax payer , and the other EU leaders kept the decision away from the public for that reason.
So, if the media won't go go into hysteria about the democratic choices of the Irish people, let them point the finger where the blame lies.
We didn't give the wrong answer, they gave us the wrong Treaty.
And on that, the people have made their judgement.