Upcoming Events

National | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link The Losing Battle to Get Public Sector ?TWaTs? Back in the Office Thu Jul 25, 2024 19:06 | Richard Eldred
Years on from Covid, Civil Service 'TWaTs' (Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday office workers) are harming productivity and leaving desks empty. The Telegraph's Tom Haynes explains how this remote work trend affects us all.
The post The Losing Battle to Get Public Sector ?TWaTs? Back in the Office appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link ?Prepare to Go to Jail,? Judge Tells Just Stop Oil Art Vandals Thu Jul 25, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
Guilty and about to face the consequences, two Just Stop Oil activists who hurled tomato soup at a Van Gogh masterpiece have been told to prepare for prison.
The post ?Prepare to Go to Jail,? Judge Tells Just Stop Oil Art Vandals appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Hundreds of Thousands Are Ditching the Licence Fee ? And It?s a Crisis for the BBC Thu Jul 25, 2024 15:00 | Richard Eldred
With an £80 million revenue drop and growing calls for a licence fee boycott, BBC bosses are struggling to prove that Britain's biggest broadcaster remains worth the cost.
The post Hundreds of Thousands Are Ditching the Licence Fee ? And It?s a Crisis for the BBC appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Democratic Party Clown Show Continues, With Giggles Replacing Bozo Thu Jul 25, 2024 13:00 | Tony Morrison
Biden's sudden exit and the canonisation of his hopeless VP is a dismal chapter in American politics ? one that will further erode trust in the democratic process, says Tony Morrison.
The post The Democratic Party Clown Show Continues, With Giggles Replacing Bozo appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link ?Climate Change? Used to Justify Government?s Record ?Investment? in Renewables. Cui Bono? Not the T... Thu Jul 25, 2024 11:05 | Richard Eldred
The Government is using the excuse of 'climate change' to justify the largest taxpayer 'investment' in wind and solar farms in British history.
The post ?Climate Change? Used to Justify Government?s Record ?Investment? in Renewables. Cui Bono? Not the Taxpayer appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Westport supports Shell to Sea

category national | environment | press release author Tuesday November 20, 2007 13:42author by Cllr Keith Martin - Labour Westport Report this post to the editors

Labour Youth Motion receives Westport Support

Westport supports Shell to Sea at crucial vote
Cllr Keith Martin of the Westport Branch
Cllr Keith Martin of the Westport Branch

At the 2007 Labour Party Conference in Wexford the Westport Branch of the Labour Party voted in support of a motion, moved by UCD and Dublin South branches calling for the Shell project to be moved off shore and for the terms of the agreement, whereby the state makes nothing in revenue and does not receive a discounted price on the gas to be re-negotiated.
The motion noted that the land of local residents had been handed over to Shell by compulsory purchasing orders to procure the pipeline's construction. It went on to list negative aspects of the project, and noted that governments led by Fianna Fáil had given corporations involved up to 100 per cent tax write-off.
Labour energy spokeswoman Liz McManus agreed that issues of exploration and royalties were important, but she warned delegates that accepting the motion, as it was drafted, would leave the State open to the risk of paying enormous compensation to a private oil company.
Ms McManus then suggested that a working party be set up to consider all the issues involved, including the impact on local communities. Ms McManus's proposal was carried by 99 votes to 73 on a show of hands.

Related Link: http://councillorkeithmartin.blogspot.com/2007/11/westport-supports-shell-to-sea.html
author by Chrissiepublication date Tue Nov 20, 2007 18:14author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Come & show yr support; you'll be welcomed!

author by Patchpublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:21author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Any renegotiation of the oil/gas terms should be preceded by an investigation into how those terms were given to Shell - the 'economic treason' as referred to by Dick Spring. Also investigated should be the meetings between the taoiseach and Shell, between the EPA and Shell - meetings denied to ordinary Irish citizens.

What is Liz. McManus blathering about? Renegotiation means just that - it does not mean imposition.
There are many ways to lever the current situation to take account of the fact that people should be allowed to exist without a permanent threat to their lives.

I hope Eamonn Gilmore can pick up where his predecessor left off in '96 -
'Does the Government intend to give legislative effect to the call by the Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise and Employment, Deputy Rabbitte, for a ban on Shell products?'
http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0466/D.0466.199605280195.html

author by daffy duck - nonepublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It appears to have fallen off the radar that there is an opportunity for the government to re-negotiate the licences when the companies register their declaration of commerciality.
That is the stage prior to commercial drilling.
They are acting under exploration licences at the moment.
Don't know if the dealaration of commerciality has been registered for the Corrib Field, but it certainly hasn't for the fields further North off the coast of Donegal.
There is a window of opportunity to renegotiate these contracts without having to fork out on compensation.
Chavez managed to renegotiate even after the declaration of commerciality.
Worth pondering.

author by Patchpublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:03author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Have I got this right - Shell embarked on a multi-million dollar project, drilling, buying and building
but had no licence to operate a refinery until last week? Isn't that a bit like a man building a mansion and then applying for planning permission - he may get it or he may not. He may have to pull the whole thing down.
So we are supposed to believe that the government and the EPA had no prior agreement with Shell that an IPPC licence would be given. We are supposed to believe that the whole project to date has been one big gamble by Shell and partners. We are also supposed to believe that there has been no corruption in government or the EPA.

I know what I believe.

author by FSBpublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 14:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

A similar rip-off happened in Russia when the Yeltsin administration gave the big energy companies incredibly favourable deals for natural resources exploitation. Shell was of course a big winner, and while allegations of corrupt practices were made, it was always going to be difficult to prove anything. ( Just ask anyone who has ever worked for Shell if corruption happens in relation to oil and gas contracts though, and see how big a laugh you get).

What the Russians did was simple-
The contract signed with Shell over Sakhalin II was subject to the company meeting normal standards in relation to the environment and pollution. Of course Shell find it impossible to meet even ordinary less than stringent standards. In the past the company's own staff have died to save the company the bother of meeting safety regulations , so the idea of spending money maintaining habitats for whales and bears didn't stand a chance.

The Russian government insisted that the original deal was void because Shell had not done enough to prevent environmental degradation.

A new deal had to be negotiated, with a large stake for the Russian people included this time.

Now, let's look at the situation in Ireland. Shell has manged to get an amazingly profitable deal in the contract to exploit Corrib.

Allegations of corruption are bandied around, but it's unlikely that Bertie Ahern or Ray Burke are losing sleep over the likelihood of anything ever being proved.

But the company has consistently had problems with planning and environmental laws. Just recently they even built a road without permission. Their project is experimental, from the length of the high-pressure pipeline to the dumping of thousands of tons of peat dug from one site into another site many miles away. It wouldn't take a genius to figure out a way of making the contract void on the basis of the way Shell are choosing to configure the deal.

All an enlightened government has to do is say they want to review aspects of the Corrib scheme and see whether it meets environmental standards. One of the government parties even had such a commitment in amongst their pre-election promises.

author by Patchpublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 19:55author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is becoming clear that Ministers Ryan and Gormley have a number of tools at their disposal if they wish to prevent the construction of the refinery. The question is: do they want to? Or was their pre-election waffle just that?
I believe they are scared/gutless/frightened to take any action against Shell and their stooges in FF.
They now have a very serious credibility issue both within the Green Party and without.

author by Maura Harrington - S2S; Davitt Leaguepublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 20:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors


In Summer 2005, while the Rossport 5 were corporate hostages, the then Minister Noel Dempsey was forced to acknowledge - following aerial photographs of a 3Km length of illegally-welded pipeline - that this illegality actually existed. He and his inept civil servants had been told about this on numerous occasions prior to photo publication but, given the then and now state of the State, they chose to take $hell's 'assurances' over that of the nasty natives.

When he was shamed into doing something he tried to get maximum spin out of it by announcing his 'tough guy' stance on the day of a support rally in Dublin.

HE WROTE $HELL A STIFF LETTER TELLING THEM THEY'D HAVE TO CUT IT UP!

WHAT DEMPSEY LEFT OUT OF THE LETTER WAS A TIME FRAME WITHIN WHICH THE PIPE WAS TO BE DISMANTLED ...

The significance of that elision - by whose dictat? - was that it gave $hell an out. IF Dempsey had laid out a 30 day compliance limit and IF $hell had failed to comply within the specified limit they would have been in breach of the Plan of Development (for what it's worth) and the State could then have played hardball - as Putin did very effectively in Sakhalin resulting in $hell CEO van der Veer hiking his ass to Russia three weeks in a row and still was forced to cede control of Sakhalin to Russia.

As the song says, 'some got balls and brains and some got balls and chains' ...

... and some don't have balls at all!

author by Chrissiepublication date Wed Nov 21, 2007 22:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Ryan, Gormley, Sargent, & all need to hear from the people about their abandonment of green concerns.

author by Patchpublication date Thu Nov 22, 2007 12:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It seems that already Shell can readily give two fingers to the Law, and the State will bend over to accommodate them. It does not bode well for any future policing or monitoring of the refinery.

[An Bord Pleanála has permitted Shell E&P Ireland to retain a temporary road which had been built initially without authorisation at the landfall for the Corrib gas pipeline.
The appeals board has said that the temporary road will not have a significant effect on the Glenamoy bog complex special area of conservation (SAC), if certain conditions are complied with.
The board has allowed the Corrib gas developers to retain the temporary development for a five-year period to "facilitate the construction of the Corrib gas pipeline".]

http://www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=1635

The S2S Solidarity Camp was removed from the same SAC by court order even though it could never be argued that it contributed even close to the equivalent damage as the illegal road.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy