New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.  We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below). 

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link George Orwell is Being Cancelled Wed Jul 24, 2024 19:30 | Paul Sutton
George Orwell himself is being cancelled, says Paul Sutton. In a conversation with Oxford Literature postgraduate students, it became clear that the great opponent of authoritarianism was no longer welcome.
The post George Orwell is Being Cancelled appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Farage Calls for Referendum on European Convention on Human Rights Wed Jul 24, 2024 17:39 | Will Jones
Keir Starmer says he will never withdraw from the ECHR because there is "no need" and Rishi Sunak did not disagree, despite it being the reason he failed to stop the boats. Nigel Farage says it's time to ask the people.
The post Farage Calls for Referendum on European Convention on Human Rights appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Fifteen Year-Old Swiss Girl Taken into Care After Parents Refuse to Consent to Course of Puberty Blo... Wed Jul 24, 2024 15:00 | Dr Frederick Attenborough
A Swiss girl has been been taken into care because her parents stopped her taking puberty blockers, breaching a ban on conversion therapy. Is this what Labour means by a "full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices"?
The post Fifteen Year-Old Swiss Girl Taken into Care After Parents Refuse to Consent to Course of Puberty Blockers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China Wed Jul 24, 2024 13:30 | Will Jones
The West's headlong rush to jettison fossil fuels and hit 'Net Zero' CO2 emissions is impoverishing us while enriching China, which is ramping up its coal-fired industry to sell us all the 'green' technology.
The post Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Threat to Democracy Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:29 | James Alexander
'Populists' like Donald Trump and Nigel Farage are a "threat to democracy", chant the mainstream media. In fact, they are just reminding our politicians what they are supposed to be doing, says Prof James Alexander.
The post The Threat to Democracy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

What if Gore Had Won in 2000?

category international | anti-war / imperialism | opinion/analysis author Sunday March 18, 2007 23:46author by Idle Speculation Report this post to the editors

Would history be different?

We can speculate on alternative scenarios that may have arose if Hitler had won WW2 or JFK had not been shot in Dallas or Cantona had not attacked a spectator with a kung fu kick.

But the most important question we must speculate about is the great "what if" of our times.

"What if Al Gore had won the US Presidential Election in 2000?"

This is what I think might have happened:

Al Gore had served in the United States House of Representatives (1977–85) and the United States Senate (1985–93) representing Tennessee. He was the Democratic nominee for President in the 2000 election — one of the most controversial and highly contested presidential elections in U.S. history. Although Gore won a plurality of the popular vote, with over half a million more votes than the Republican candidate George W. Bush, the final result was only decided by a month of ballot recounts and court challenges in the state of Florida led the Supreme Court to end the highly disputed contest with its final ruling of Bush v. Gore, handing the electoral college victory, and consequently the presidency, to Gore.

President Gore was sworn in for his first term on January 20, 2001.
The Gore Administration began immediately with bitter controversy and partisan divisions in Washington as the President announced a sweeping legislative reform of environmental laws particularly in relation to industrial and domestic greenhouse gases emissions.
This aroused intense opposition from the Republican dominated Senate and Congress. Gore's initiatives were not helped by his poor public image especially his speaking style which gave rise to the nickname "President Bore."

However in the summer of 2001, Republican credibility was soon in tatters when some of his most vocal critics were immersed in scandals. Dennis Hastert, House Speaker resigned after revelations of corruption and attempts to frustrate Federal investigations. Tom De Lay resigned as two of his aides were implicated in the Jack Abramoff affair. Abramoff and other lobbyists were accused of illegally giving gifts and making campaign donations to legislators in return for votes or support of legislation.
Yet another Republican, Mark Foley was implicated in a sex scandal involving congressional pages and also resigned.

Nonetheless Gore's environmental reforms remained stalled for the remainder of his administration. Gore also abandoned proposals to legalise gay marriage and stem cell research after angry demonstrations in Washington by Christians and other conservative groups who also claimed that Gore had “stolen” the Presidency.

On April 1, 2001 US/China relations were severely strained as a US spy plane and a Chinese fighter plane collided off the Chinese coast. The Chinese pilot was killed and the crew of the damaged US plane forced to land on Hainan were released on April 11 after the Gore administration apologised to the Chinese authorities.
Gore was heavily criticised by former Presidential candidate Governor of Texas George W. Bush among others.

Suffering in the polls President Gore made numerous visits to Europe meeting French President Chirac, German Chancellor Shroeder, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Russian President Vladimir Putin in an attempt to organise an international conference to discuss the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, international drug and people trafficking, AIDS and poverty in Africa.

President Gore also met with ailing pontiff, Pope John Paul II who sternly criticised him for his support for abortion and homosexual marriage. The President continued his predecessor's involvement in the Northern Ireland peace process but in 2001 Sinn Fein and Unionist politicians still stubbornly refused to come to political agreements and little progress was made. President Gore was enthusiastically welcomed on a visit to Dublin and Belfast.

In early September, the Israel/Palestine conflict spiralled out of control. Palestinian suicide bombings and Israeli targeted assassination drew equal international condemnation. Vice President Joe Lieberman visited the Israeli and Palestinian leaders to encourage a ceasefire and peace negotiations but was unable to make headway.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, nineteen hijackers led by Egyptian Muhammed Atta took control of four passenger airliners armed with cheap knives they smuggled on board the aircraft. Two of the planes were crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York killing thousands of civilians, fighter fighters and police officers. The third and fourth planes turned for Washington D.C. Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon killing hundreds of people.
President Gore was in the act of addressing the American people on television when his speech was interrupted by the secret service who hurriedly evacuated him to the bunker underneath the building. Minutes later Flight 93 impacted with and destroyed the White House.

Vice President Joe Lieberman was in Tel Aviv meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon when news came through of the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington and that the fate of President Gore was unknown. Lieberman shaken by the news immediately returned to Washington D.C under fighter escort.

Hours of confusion followed in Washington before President Gore emerged unscathed from the attack on the Executive Mansion. He immediately addressed the nation again and promised that America would not rest until terrorism was defeated and that those who had thought they could break the will of the American people were gravely mistaken.

America’s shock and grief turned rapidly turned to anger.
President Gore received overwhelming bipartisan support for a military campaign to hunt down the suspected mastermind of the attacks, Osama Bin Laden who for several years had lived in Afghanistan where he operated terrorist training camps with the consent of the ruling Taliban government. On October 7 the US military began operations against the Taliban government and by December they had been ousted from Kabul and replaced with a new American backed government led by Hamid Karzai. In the battle for the Tora Bora mountains where Al-Qaeda was headquartered, US forces had failed to capture Osama Bin Laden who had fled across the Pakistan border. NATO forces remained in Afghanistan to provide security in preparation for democratic elections and for the country to be rebuilt. The Gore administration was heavily criticised by vocal Republicans especially Senator John McCain for “not fighting the war aggressively and letting Bin Laden off the hook.”

The Gore administration announced sweeping new legislation to give law enforcement agencies new powers to pursue and detain terrorist suspects on American soil in order to prevent further terrorist attacks. Meanwhile members of Al-Qaeda captured in Afghanistan were transferred to a new prison installation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba drawing international criticism from the international community.
Following the 9/11 attacks billions had been wiped off the American stock markets the world economy experienced a global downturn and oil prices rose dramatically but recovered gradually in 2002.
In his 2002 State of the Union address Gore vowed to continue the so-called “Struggle Against Islamic Extremism” and offered the hand of friendship to governments of the Middle East who co-operated with the US.
The Arab League replied that unless America forced Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza, America would receive no co-operation in the fight against Islamic extremism because its root cause was US and Israeli aggression against Muslim nations. Mass demonstrations by Islamic fundamentalists in Mecca, Cairo, Damascus, Baghdad, Teheran and Karachi condemned America and Israel. In Us cities such as New York, Washington and San Francisco and European capitals such as Paris, London, Rome and Berlin millions of demonstrators protested against American “war crimes” in Afghanistan and condemned “imperial wars of aggression.”

Gore put intense pressure on Sharon’s government to cease targeted assassinations of Palestinian terrorist suspects and withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza. Sharon and other Israeli leaders rejected US demands while the Israelis public held mass protests. Israel also assassinated Palestinian PM Yasser Arafat in a helicopter rocket attack on his car.

The years 2002 to 2003 saw a rise in Islamic extremism in Europe and Asia and a series of bombings and other atrocities in a number of cities such as Madrid, London, Moscow, Istanbul and Moscow. Riots occurred in Paris and other French cities and martial law was declared French President Jacques Chirac.
On 14 July, 2002 President Chirac was assassinated with a rifle during the annual Bastille Day parade by a right wing extremist named Maxime Brunerie.
Gore travelled to Europe urging unity in the so-called " War Against Islamic Extremism." European governments, press and anti-war demonstrators rejected his rhetoric as misleading misguided and simplistic and blamed American support for Israel for inciting Islamic extremism in the first place. NATO forces gradually withdrew from Afghanistan as the strength of the resurgent Taliban insurgency increased. Hamid Karzai pleaded with the Gore Administration to send more US troops.

As a result in the November 2002 elections Republicans regained ground after the scandals of the previous year and won massive majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives. America they claimed had lost its prestige internationally.

In April 2003 the President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein was assassinated by his unstable son son Uday in an attempted coup. Uday’s naked grab for power and his continuation of the brutal Baathist regime aroused further Republican criticism of President Gore. for failing to intervene in the Middle East.

The following year’s Presidential election was dominated by Iraq. The Republican candidate was Senator John McCain who advocated military intervention in Iraq. He believed that establishing a “foothold” in the Middle East would allow the United States to halt terrorism in the region and put a stop the growing power and nuclear threat of Iran.
President Gore and his new Vice Presidential running mate John Kerry (Joe Lieberman had publicly accused Gore of “cowardice and appeasement” before he resigned) pointed out the Iraq would “become another Vietnam.” Kerry asked “how many Americans are going to die for a mistake?” John McCain’s campaign was seriously wounded after it was alleged that he gave classified information to the Vietnamese about American air tactics while in captivity in Hanoi to receive preferential treatment. After a bitter campaign Gore was returned to the White House by a narrow margin.

Uday Hussein was assassinated in early 2005 by senior Iraqi generals and Iraq was soon torn apart by bloody civil war between Sunni and Shia Muslims. By early 2006 hundreds of thousands had been massacred in daily car bombings or by marauding death squads and as millions of refugees fled it soon became clear that Sunni extremists were being supported by Saudi Arabia and Syria while the majority Shia led by Muqtada Al-Sadr were being supported by the government of Iran. Al-Qaeda was also rumoured to be operating in Iraq. Terrorist bombing attacks occurred in the cities of Cairo, Damascus, Riyadh, Beirut and Kuwait.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon suffered a massive stroke in early 2006 and was replaced by Ehud Olmert. In the summer of 2006 Israel fought an inconclusive war with Lebanon and specifically Hezbollah after the Iranian backed terrorist group kidnapped Israeli soldiers and began bombarding Northern Israel with rockets. Israel responded with air attacks and a ground assault with tanks and troops into southern Lebanon. The month long war ended in a shaky ceasefire after Israeli failed to defeat Hezbollah and the Lebanese economy was shattered. Hezbollah ceased its rocket attacks and negotiations began to release the hostage soldiers. Thousands of Lebanese and scores of Israelis had died.

In 2006 yet public anger at what they perceive is Gore’s “appeasement” was responsible another Republican majority returned to both houses.
Political analysts predicted the Gore administration could “no longer ignore reality no longer.”

President Gore, Secretary of Defence Wesley Clarke, Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke, National Security Advisor Leon Fuerthe and CIA Director George Tenet were savaged in the American press for “a foreign policy meltdown on a catastrophic scale.” Republicans demanded and forced the resignation of both Clarke and George Tenet. The Baker Commission headed by former Secretary of State James Baker produced a report recommending US military involvement in Iraq to halt the ongoing civil war.
American public opinion had swung in favour of military intervention though international opinion especially in Europe was extremely hostile. President Gore is regularly portrayed in Europe as a “warmonger” or “Blood & Gore” while in America he is portrayed by Republican pro-war demonstrators as “The World’s No. 1 Appeaser.” Rumours still circulate that Gore stole the 2000 election and a minority fringe claim the 2004 election was also questionable.

As of 2007 both North Korea and Iran have tested nuclear weapons and refused the negotiations with the US. Military action has been opposed at the UN Security Council by France, Germany, Russia and China. However bending to US public pressure President Gore has authorised a strong US Navy carrier presence in the region. War seems likely in Iraq and is eagerly expected by the US media to be winnable. The new CIA director Robert Gates predicts a “cakewalk.”

author by Robert Harrispublication date Mon Mar 19, 2007 09:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Great writing and extremely plausible. Sent shivers up my spine.

author by A10publication date Mon Mar 19, 2007 14:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Not much difference than what reality has given us.Just with Gore it would proably alot worse,as he would proably have ignored just about all world events and spent his presidency pushing thru enviromental issues.Its the enviroment stupid. Would have been Bores election logo.

author by flatulencepublication date Mon Mar 19, 2007 14:35author address author phone Report this post to the editors

utter utter crap. You didn't mention mrs Gore once. You didn't hint at her fundamentalist christian beliefs which would have made pre-911 Bush ( before the daily prayer sessions in the white house) look like James Buchanan pushing recognition of his life long love (& vice president) William Rufus King.

utter utter utter crap. All this is - is a rewrite of the crimes of the last 7 years - as if they had nothing to do with the incumbent of the White House. worse than crap. it's poison and an insult to the victims of the Bush regime.
the american people & the iraqi people being the most important. I hope moderators have the decency to act against such wickedness.

author by Idle Speculationpublication date Mon Mar 19, 2007 16:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Harold Macmillan, was asked by a young journalist after a long dinner what can most easily steer a government off course, he answered "Events, dear boy. Events".

author by radical jonnypublication date Mon Mar 19, 2007 17:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

If Gore were elected in 2000, we'd have been able to see the US invade Iraq under his presidency. The forces in the Pentagon would've argued long and hard to deal with that old enemy (as they did under Bush). Bush's administration didn't need nearly as much convincing as Gore's might have, but something tells me that Gore would've eventually gone for it.

And I wonder if Gore would've pushed the environmental agenda if he'd made the top spot...

Still, great food for thought.

author by gorey detailpublication date Tue Mar 20, 2007 07:55author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Here's some information relevant to the one we are actually living in

http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair03172007.html

Well worth a read to help disabuse you of the notion that gore is any better than the rest of them.
And note that this article was Written by one of "the good guys" too!

author by iosafpublication date Tue Mar 20, 2007 18:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

& some of the most interesting works of contemporary US writing in the "fantasy genre" have been alternative histories. You could begin with Philip K Dick's work. But it's a genre which is not just confined to US authors, Vlad Nabakov must be mentioned.
I'll give examples which are well worth the read or watching the movie if so applicable:- "the eagle has landed" mussolini is rescued and the nazis go to assassinate churchill. Most of the alternative histories deal with the 2nd war. I'm sure "Fatherland" is familiar to many, its alternative sees a nazi victory in Europe and eventual entente between president Joe Kennedy of the USA and Hitler.... both of them anti-semites. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherland_%28novel%29
I thik the best though (by far) are by Harry turtledove - who starts with what I believe to have been the most crucial yet most ignored war of recent history - the US civil war. Turtledove's 191 timeline series runs to many volumes - Woodrow Wilson the anti-semite and racist naturally (more naturally) serving as president of the Confederacy and dixie amongst many of its very thought provoking ideas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline-191
Whilst checking if there was a wikipedia page on the whole genre - I was surprised to learn that Livy the Latin classical writer is attributed with the first such speculation - "Book IX, sections 17-19, of Livy's History of Rome from Its Foundation. Livy contemplates the possibility of Alexander the Great expanding his father's empire westward instead of eastward and attacking Rome in the 4th century BC. His main question is: "What would have been the results for Rome if she had been engaged in war with Alexander?""
& other ones which might tickle the intellects of people on this site - include "the Neanderthal Parallax" series by Robert J. Sawyer. They are brilliant in that they combine all elements of the genre - fictionalised history, what -if?, science fiction and parallel universe theories from science.
Which is why I suppose they won awards. Sawyer's neanderthals are very interesting - their brains disallow religion for example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_Parallax

wow......eh? ..................so?

what would have happened if 1916 had been a military success thanks to the foresight of Childers who at the last moment was allowed take part in the planning and suggested a blockade of the port?
What would have happened if the Great O Neill hadn't surrendered and rather waited three more weeks and then learnt of Elizabeth's death?
& of course my favourite - because it touches so much on propaganda, fakery, mirrors and lies -
what would have happened if the weather had been different on October 20th 1805? I of course refer to a very long speculative piece which I wrote from the official memorial day till the 7th of July 2005 (c/f http://indymedia.ie/article/70500 ) Quite a few "what if's".
Yes. most definitely alternative histories are worth considering. But only if you get the "turn-off" right which is what worries me about them. History was not begun or finished on the 20th of October 1805 any more than the 11th of September 2001. But our understanding of history uses these events & it is all to easy to think "history would have been different" and launch yourself into the subjunctive from that day onwards.
In an alternative universe 1916 was a resounding success and allowed the Kaiser to beat the British only to suffer a bolshevik revolution later on which led to the establishment of a one world government under Lenin who's still alive thanks to Soviet science, & Sean Garland is our regional secretary general but Irish people no longer speak their language, meet at crossroads, dance or even display an interest in alcohol or music.
& perhaps not least - what would have happened if Europe and the world had rejected the official version of the 11th of September & blamed Cheney (just as an example) & then stopped the Iraq war? would the UN be relevant? Would business in Shannon have dropped off?

or my neck of the woods - what would have happened if thousands of people of which I was one - hadn't protested Aznar's government the days after the 11th of March and the PP had won and continued to blame ETA? Indeed that last "alternative" is grist for the mill in Spanish society today, it's called "the conspiracy theory". It's the main rallying point of the right wing opposition despite all evidence to the contrary. But I said it would be so - exactly 3 years ago on the night of the election http://indymedia.ie/article/63840 and not a single other person, journalist or blogger - amateur or professional got that right. Which makes me a sort of timelord. Now if you don't mind I've to go back in time and do something, if it works the end of this sentance will just disappear. Thus will the importance be lost of Fatima ever having done

author by historianpublication date Tue Mar 20, 2007 19:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors

thought I'd add that.

author by Trekpublication date Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You need to understand what Gore is, before you propose what he would have done as president.

Gore's environmentalism is only skin-deep 'Hollywood style.

He, and the administration he was a part of, were in the back pocket of Monsanto. See gorey detail's link above.

For an examination of his overall politics then check out Gore Vidal (Gore's cousin) interview below,

The inside track on "Cousin Albert"

.....While his “cousin Albert” has effortlessly inhabited the vestments of a liberal politician, to hear Gore Vidal tell it, the former Vice President’s liberalism is merely a prop developed to bring him to the head of the Democratic Party.

“Well, although we are cousins, and I was a friend of his father’s, I’ve always thought he was absolutely pointless as a politician. He’s just another conservative southerner.”

In fact, Al Gore’s voting record as a senator was surprisingly conservative until he rolled his eye toward the White House. Throughout most of his career, he was pro-life and had an 84% anti-abortion rating from the National Right to Life Committee. From 1979 – 81, he voted five times on the side of a Republican sponsored rider that granted a tax exemption for schools like Bob Jones University that discriminate on the basis of race. He was openly anti-gay, calling homosexuality “abnormal” and “wrong,” and telling the Tennessean in 1984 that he did “not believe it is simply an acceptable alternative that society should affirm.” Gore was such a strong supporter of the gun lobby – ultimately voting against the critical 1985 legislation for a mandatory 14-day waiting period for handgun purchases – that National Rifle Association leader Wayne LaPierre once said, “We could have made Al Gore NRA Man of the Year – every single vote.” Finally, when it came time to vote on conservative Supreme Court nominees, Gore publicly praised but voted against the scandal-ridden Clarence Thomas. He voted in Antonin Scalia. If the wider public had been more aware of his legacy, few would have recognized the Al Gore of 1988 who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Pulling his hat down so that his eyes are shadowed from the sun, Vidal continues his effortless assault on Al Gore: “Another border-state, southern lover of the Pentagon…there was never anything the Pentagon asked for that Cousin Albert wasn’t down there giving it to them; he voted for the first war in the Gulf.”

Indeed, Al Gore was one of only ten Democrats to break with the party and vote for President Bush Sr.’s Gulf War in 1991. .....


Related Link: http://www.gnn.tv/articles/2301/Some_Inconvenient_Truths_About_Al_Gore
author by sword play and copyrightspublication date Wed May 16, 2007 16:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

owning an idea is how people make their money and fame. and sir bob Geldof of the
garter and the blair regime is well pissed off with Gore's 'stealing' of the live aid
template to promote the anti-global warming gigs.

neither of these men have an idea about the suffering their respective governments
have caused, they are product of global media and transnational guilt-trips.

let go the fucking ego and PR machines!

having huge stupid concerts to denude the greed generations credit card is not
education= they are giant prats.

http://www.guardian.co.uk

patenting an idea is not about confronting global greed , its about ego massage and
how many honours one can accrue.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy