New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political Sat Jan 11, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl
Science, nominally the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, is at it again. In November, they published an editorial saying that scientists need to be even more political than they already are.
The post Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure Sat Jan 11, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones
BlackRock, the world's biggest asset manager, is abandoning the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative after coming under pressure from Republican politicians over its support for woke climate policies.
The post BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle Sat Jan 11, 2025 13:00 | Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson write about the appalling treatment of Covid vaccine whistleblower Dr Byram Bridle, the Canadian immunologist who was removed from duties for raising the alarm about the vaccine.
The post The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link ?High Chance? Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts Sat Jan 11, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones
There is a "high chance" that Rachel Reeves will be forced to announce emergency?spending cuts?this spring, Barclay's Chief Economist has said, as borrowing costs surged again on Friday.
The post “High Chance” Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine Sat Jan 11, 2025 09:00 | Dr Copernicus
Dr. Daniel Armstrong has had his name erased from the U.K. Medical Register and been barred from practice for making a video in which he argued that the Covid vaccines are unsafe, untested and cause harm.
The post Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en

offsite link End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en

offsite link After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en

offsite link Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

BIN THE CRIME BILL

category national | rights, freedoms and repression | opinion/analysis author Saturday April 29, 2006 16:07author by O. McCool - Branskelligs Think Tankauthor email oomccool at yahoo dot ie Report this post to the editors

What Is the Minister So Afraid Of?

Implications of Minister For Justice' comments and actions around the February 25 riots; relationship of same to Minister's re-write of the criminal code currently under consideration by the Dail.

BIN THE CRIME BILL
What Is the Minister So Afraid Of?

Generally speaking, TD Gormley has been insufficiently applauded for calling the Minister For Justice to account for the situation which deteriorated into a full-scale riot in Dublin on February 25, 2006. Mr. Gormley raised a truly fascinating question about the curious nature of said failure, in view of “internet activity” which should have alerted said Ministry that special preparations were called for in Dublin that day.

The Minister’s response was highly significant (insinuating that his critics somehow secretly enlisted rioters to attack political opponents’ offices.) I say “response,” because one can hardly call it a “reply.” On the contrary, Mr. McDowell’s now admittedly irresponsible remarks, regardless of subsequent apologies or retractions, were supremely successful in one regard: they managed to completely deflect the discussion away from Mr. Gormley’s very interesting question; (which, unless I’m mistaken, remains unanswered to this day.)

With an extraordinarily distracting non-denial, The Minister succeeded in deftly maneuvering himself out of the hot-seat of self-defense, and his political opponent into it. The only disappointment was in seeing the bait so well-taken, when Mr. Gormley followed the feint into demands for retraction, rather than remaining focussed on his original, spot-on question; which the Minister thus demonstrated himself willing to do or say anything rather than to answer.

Mr. Gormley made momentary mention of evidence which suggests that Justice’ lack of preparation was not due to ignorance of what kind of trouble might expected in the streets of Dublin on February 25. The Minister’s warmth suggested that this query caught him off guard, with something that he hadn’t expected to be asked. It was a rare opportunity to run the fox to ground, tragically missed.

Mr. McDowell’s logic may be recognizable to those who’ve had the misfortune to live under some of the world’s most vicious political animals. Its complex twists and turns have a shockingly simple underpinning. A skeleton key may be found in the standard reports of corrupt police who beat detainees: invariably, they charge their victims with assaulting an officer. Likewise, murders committed by killers in uniform are frequently recorded in their official reports as “suicide.” Characteristically, FBI agents, after blowing up an environmental activist in her automobile, charged the victim with carrying explosives. (This last, the landmark Bari case, resulted in convictions of FBI agents concerned, and a record-making multi-million dollar lawsuit award. Against, lest we forget, Mr. McDowell’s favorite stateside cronies, the FBI.)

It is far more than merely sad that it was the Minister’s indefensible language that garnered all the subsequent media attention. More than absurd or tragic: while it’s Mr. Gormley’s pertinent question which we all need to ask. (Uh, what was the question?)

A reasonable onlooker may be tempted to wonder at a marvelous confluence of events: a sudden wave of violent crimes, murders and biggest-drug-seizures-in-history (albeit ever apostrophized by the ubiquitous tag “police say.”) Or is it only a sudden wave of constant, shrill hammering of such stories by an increasingly British/American multi-national-owned local press?) All this just at the time that the Minister’s making feverish efforts to shove a complex and poorly understood new criminal code down the legislature’s throats “by summer.”

Is this the sensitive place that Mr. Gormley inadvertently touched, thus drawing on his head Mr. McDowell’s “weapons of mass distraction”?

All a minister in Mr. McDowell’s position need do to create the atmosphere of hysteria most conducive to the acceptance of anything labeled “anti-crime” is . . . do nothing. (Of which the Dublin riots, and other recent national tragedies, may be excellent examples.) Of course, a dependable cadre of corrupt officers, in the highest places, would be invaluable in such a scenario. (Cushy retirement packages, with handsome lump-sum payments, to high-ranking culpables in recent police scandals, may come to mind.)

The lightening speed and destructiveness of Mr. McDowell’s irresponsible comments are a flashing red light for all to see: Do not ask that question. Anyone who asks the Minister for Justice questions which he does not welcome, can expect this kind of immediate, vicious menace, via intimidating abuse of his law enforcement authority. It sends a chilling message about the kind of abuse the country can expect of him. If examined in light of the classic “takes-one-to-know-one” modus operandi of corrupt law enforcement noted above, it is sure to be even more enlightening.

Is this the sort of man fit to write laws for our country? Such cynical opportunism has no business wielding the most dangerous discretionary power over the rights and freedoms of the entire nation. Let alone re-write the rule book to suit his purposes for next summer.

The March 2nd issue of Village Magazine, discussing the riots, noted “since the early 1980s a large segment of working class youths have opted out of society through drugs, violence and criminality.” It was during that same period, “since the 1980s” (that is, throughout the regime of the Minister’s stateside cronies, Bush and his mentor Reagan) an identical process dominated the USA: every year, more “drugs, violence, and criminality”; used by said regime as an excuse for more and more draconian and constitutionally-suspect “anti-crime” legislation. Which somehow never seems to result in anything but more “drugs, violence and criminality,” more & more arbitrary police powers, more prisons, and, of course, more “drugs, violence and criminality”: in an eternally self-perpetuating downward spiral, ad nauseum.

The latest episode in a continual parade of extraordinary conduct by our Minister for Justice is the sudden introduction of over 300 pages of changes to his crime bill, along with a suspiciously bombastic insistence that it become law “by summer.”

Such a move by any legislator at any time can mean only one thing: there’s something buried in that new law that the Minister wants very, very badly. And which he’s very, very afraid might be discovered if anyone looks at it carefully, before it becomes law. Even more afraid than he was of answering Mr. Gormley’s question about Justice’ role in the Dublin riots of February 25.

© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy