The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović Anti-Empire >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog. We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Reflections on Irish Neutrality
national |
anti-war / imperialism |
opinion/analysis
Tuesday February 21, 2006 16:32 by michael
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
"Commentators might quite correctly point to the hypocrisy of a state proclaiming neutrality, and yet engaging in activities which do not appear to be on all fours with such proclamation." -- Ms. Justice Macken ('Dubsky v. Ireland' Conclusions) Discussing Irish neutrality is difficult, not because of the meaning of the second word, but because of the double-meaning of the first. The Oxford English Dictionary says it could be either (1) relating to Ireland or Irish, or (2) illogical or apparently so.
Neutrality is a well established part of international law. Like most other international law, it doesn't change whether you are talking about Ireland or Germany, or South Africa or Cuba, or any other state. We must apply (at least) the same standards to ourselves as we do to others. And if we accept that golden rule, then "Irish Neutrality" translates to mean "Ireland enforcing its rights and duties as a neutral power". It arises when there is a war and Ireland isn't on the attacking or receiving end.
If we are not a neutral power, then we are one of the belligerents. As a belligerent we would still have special rights and duties, and they wouldn't change under international law if we added "Irish" here or there.
Being a neutral power during a time of war hasn't changed much since 1907 when the Hague Conventions on the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War were first signed. Those guidelines form part of customary international law now, and say that you should arrest belligerents who try to pass through your territory to war.
Judge Macken is due to decide on costs this Wednesday, for the Judicial Review proceedings I took against the Irish Government over the Afghanistan war. She ruled in favour of the government on all counts in her High Court judgement on December 13th, 2005.
The war in Afghanistan wasn't a war, even if you call it that. It wasn't a war, even if the armed forces of the most powerful states all descended upon that forlorn place, blowing up whatever they could, and arming whatever warlord would fight. The Irish Constitution says war, but this wasn't one. It wasn't an armed conflict, because wars aren't armed conflicts. So says the judge anyway.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)