Charles to marry Camilla

by Nikita2224 Sat Apr 23, 2005 19:58

Camilla is still married to Andrew Parker Bowles a Catholic ,that is in the eyes of the Catholic church.If in future Chas:tries to put her on the throne with him as seems likely,where does that leave English Catholics and the Catholic Church in England?It was in very bad taste for Chas: to take her to Westminster Cathedral with him for the memorial service for John Paul 11 given her undecided status.

by Nikita2224 Sat Apr 23, 2005 13:32

No one begrudges them marrying ,they should have done it 3 decades ago before they dragged 2 spouses and 4 children under their wagon wheels.Whether they are fit to come to the throne after all they've done is another matter.A relative of Cams called her"The laziest woman born in England in the 20th C:"and Mark Bolland who used to work for Chas:says she is "monumentally lazy" and gets bad tempered if you try to get her to do anything,also she backed out of her first solo trip due to nerves,we were always told Diana had nerves and C.P.B was a calm cool lady!!!

by Nikita2224 Sat Apr 23, 2005 13:22

You're glad these 2 won't be able 2 have kids?How do you know they haven't already?Given that Cams grandma was probably Edward7ths daughter ,what might D.N.A on the Parker-Bowles kids come up with?The affair has been goin long enough after all for one or both 2 be Chucks.

by Nikita2224 Sat Apr 23, 2005 13:13

In Andrews' case dad is rumoured to be the late Lord Caernarvon, and in Edwards case Patrick Plunkett an Irishman who used to run the Royal house, also deceased and buried by E.R II in the private inner royal burial ground at Frogmore-how he got in when the old Duke of Windsor had to battle to get Wallis buried there makes you think Plunkett meant a lot to her.

by republicano enfermar Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:33

Ella es una mujer muy poco atractiva. El es un hombre repugnar feo. La cabeza se parece a un VW con las puertas abre. ¿Qué está con esas orejas? ¡Preferiría él o ella o ambos se decapitaron - ahora que habría sido un valor del partido que ve!

by Hector Alamilla - particular Sun Apr 10, 2005 03:50 seetabinformatica at stps dot gob dot mx 3123007

MIS MAS SINCERAS FELICITACIONES POR SU MATRIMONIO.

EN MEXICO TODOS LOS HOMBRES SOMOS IGUALES Y ME CUESTA TRABAJO ENTENDER EL PROTOCOLO "REAL". CARLOS, CAMILA Y DIANA FUERON VICTIMAS DE UN ESTILO DE VIDA ANACRONICO.

CIUDAD DE VILLAHERMOSA, TABASCO, MÉXICO

by barry Sat Apr 09, 2005 21:48

you sound like you walk on water or something

by turn off your tv! Sat Apr 09, 2005 21:44

were you as embarrassed for the person being beheaded? did you blush? the shame of it -just like the antics of a woman on her hen night. god, they must have been mortified showing their disembodied face the next day. imagine.

what did you win for your daring peek at someones life being taken?

you like to watch. so don't complain.

by barry Sat Apr 09, 2005 20:26

Ive just watched channel 4 news. Itcarried horrific footage of Camillas hen-night.
There was a male stripper wearing a thong and a Prince charles mask. Im not sure what else happened as I was watching horrified from behind my hands.

A mate dared me to watch an internet beheading once, and the emotions i felt were quite similar - this is horrific , why am i looking at this, why wouldanyone do that ?

Shes a skanger now as well as a minger.

by Clotho, Lachesis, Atropos Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:55

they've made quite an effort in the last week
.:. even shaking mugabe's hand to say a little squeeky no! to Blair's "the people's pope" catholic government. . If they just get on with it now, and don't annoy anyone any more, and provide a "good example" to people going through latter life second marriage in their relations to others, and the stepchildren, then ok so be it, send em to the fields of the farm in cornwall, we all know a shadow was cast by the mother of two of these new stepchildren, but the next "coronation" in our world of cause and effect is to replace Karol as sovreign of the Holy See, and his life has possibly had a more serious shadow cast on it.

for one at least this thread was spun in the last week.

by Gunther Fri Apr 08, 2005 15:53

That is a very not pretty union of two persons that marraige. The very ugly man Charles with the ears is not a good man and his woman she is old and is been married and sexed Charles with her married husband still so she is not a good woman. I do not have good words for they.

by dianne dyer - home Thu Apr 07, 2005 21:42 didy at btinternet dot com flat 2,39,salterton road,exmouth,devon,ex8 2ed

Good luck to charles & camilla!They deserve peace & happiness at last.We are ordinary people who have been through divorce & remarriage our selves with children.Many people now can say the same for whatever reason Good luck Dianne Steve & family.

by ipsiphi - guild of all that glitters is not gold Mon Apr 04, 2005 21:33

it has been postponed by one day and will not be well attended though the mugs will probably sell.

.:. 2 squared and cubed is the Roman Pontiff's funeral .:.

The compromise between calvinism and catholicism which had brought the engurlish to war when brother killed brother under bloody mary and edward vii has endured with its 39 articles of faith for a very long time as a very broad church of believers who have attracted less acusations of hypocrisy than the church of rome.
& lest you never noticed the anglican order of service was almost exactly the same as the tridentine rite (pre vatican 2 latin mass) of the roman church but translated to english.
Incidently it was only at Elizabeth the first time that recorded marriage became common place between ordinary people check your geneology (there are websites to help you).

"what god has brought together no man may rend asunder",
as we know many partnerships blessed in chapel or written in law can not really be thought to have been divinely arranged or inspired. But one thing is certain, Charles marriage to Diana gave two princes to england and scotland and "many in other places too". Those two sons are living testament of the choices Charles made by marrying Diana 23 years ago, though he has enjoyed the love of Camilla for 33 years.

We are all created equally.
That is a self-evident truth,
but injustice, inequality, non fraternity, and non liberty in the lives and opportunities offered all means that either a mediocre meritocracy or privelaged heridatary plutocracy shapes the destiny of billions.

One supposed advantage of having princes, is the education that they might be afforded them by their nation(s). Both William and Harry have had excellent educations and are prepared to serve their nation(s) well. Alas, the same can not nor could not nor ought not be said for Charles.

To many eyes his actions since the Roman Pontiff began his great and public suffering have clearly shown that he is unsuitable for what he considers his "birthright". As anyone with even a passing familiarity with the Magic Flute knows, a prince may be first of his land, but that doesn't mean he gets his own way all the time or even passes the tests that prove him.

His civil wedding thus shall be held in the Guildhall on the 9th day of the 4th month, and not the 8th as he would have vainly planned.

sin é.

by Noel Mon Apr 04, 2005 15:01

"And anyway Anglicism is a daft made up religion founded on the overactive bollocks of henry 8th. Hardly a faith"

I'm always perplexed as to why the Protestant majority in Northern Ireland could possibly feel uncomfortable with the prospect of a united Ireland.

by barry Mon Apr 04, 2005 14:04

as my first critic pointed out , that faith was invented a few 100 years ago by a mad, toothless ginger haired woman from England with the same megalomaniac delusions of grandeur and divine right as Lizzie windsor.

by Barry Mon Apr 04, 2005 14:00

Mrs Windsor , claims that the very Irish soil on which im standing is HER property, by divine right no less. She believes that me and tens of 1000s of other of my fellow citizens are her subjects , for some weird reason.

The troops which she and her family claim the allegiance of occupy my country, and have destroyed the lives of innocents.

Meanwhile the death squads which slaughtered 100s for 30 years in the name of the crown and the protestant religion were never disowned, or even admonished by the old witch.

i believe that entitles the church which shes head of to a bit of criticism. In the immortal words of Bart Simpson, she can eat my shorts.

by Devil Dog Mon Apr 04, 2005 13:41

Liek the way you denigrate the beliefs of a few million people...if it's not a faith, then surely neither is the superstitious mumbo jumbo of the Catholic Church....and I haven't noticed many child rapists among the ranks of Anglican clergy.

by barry Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:48

but as you havent criticised the rest of what ive said i can only assume it to be spot on.

by ah yah! Mon Apr 04, 2005 00:40

had nothing to do with anglicanism.

he died a roman catholic though one in a load of mortal sin and obesity.
Elizabeth his daughter by Anne Boylyn was responsible for anglicanism which was a compromise between calvinism and roman catholicism and held pretty much the same dogma except the services were in the language of the people and not latin.
this is common misconception mr Barry, please consider yourself now to be corrected.

by Barry Sun Apr 03, 2005 17:47

as big eared , minger chasing, grouse massacring, paratroop leading, plant bothering, tampon wannabe who has a servant to wipe his royal bottom..

Who wasnt caught in the middle of a homosexual act with a butler.

As well as being an utter laughing stock. Hell be inviting Bertie or maybe even Jordan and Peter Andre to the wedding at this rate

Defender of the faith ?

He couldnt defend for Wycombe wanderers.

And anyway Anglicism is a daft made up religion founded on the overactive bollocks of henry 8th. Hardly a faith.

by guild of organists Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:47

The Queen of the UK "the British Monarch" has let it be known in the british press today (timed to con-incide with her letters of condolence to the Holy See on the death of the Roman Pontiff) that the reason she will not be attending the wedding of the Prince of Wales is because she is putting her duties as the head of the Church of England before family feelings.

She has told a friend that she feels it incompatible with her role as Supreme Governor of the Church to attend a civil marriage ceremony, particularly one involving the heir to the throne. She does not want to set a precedent that could damage the Church of England.

"I am not able to go. I do not feel that my position [as Supreme Governor of the Church] permits it," the Queen told her friend.

The British monarch has since just before the time of the English Reformation carried the title FD, (defender of the faith) a papal contract to protect the "kernal" of the Constantine dogma. Its a peculiar arrangement which not many people understand the nature of. But its considered so important it still gets put on the coins. Whereas over fifty other little letters and titles and contracts don't. It's an ancient "bond".

For their part the Spanish Royal house last week confirmed that they would not attend, an annoucement which was followed almost immediately on the "ancient house and address circuit" by all other Catholic royal houses "crowned" or "uncrowned", ranging from the "armed franciscans" (grimaldi family of monaco) to the "very sharp teeth" lichtenstein family even to the "very good at roman art collecting" thyssen crew.
They can all be thought to sit on the same side of the ancient chessboard but on different squares, thier "bonds" being Lepant, malta and so on. Their "power" could be counted in Lichtenstein if you had the account numbers, but to put it simply, theirs is the finance that keeps the whole mess underwritten "For good or bad" and hopefully this century "for better".
It is not reported whether Charles has invited any representatives from non-Constantine belief systems, he has voiced a willingness to change the FD title (not in his let) to encompass hinduism, buddhism, and all faiths even mormonism and apocalyptic christian fundamentalism, which shows a certain ignorance of the nature of some duties he would be charged with;- were he to become monarch.

It's not all just having your photo taken, opening homeless shelters, playing polo and eating good grub.

by guild of moralists & bards Sun Apr 03, 2005 00:07

between the pretendent candidate for the title of FD and his lover of many years be celebrated during the period of official mourning for the Roman Pontiff.
.:.

by barry Sat Apr 02, 2005 19:45

I presume that means the bride will be carrying the groom over the threshold ???

by Rita Sat Apr 02, 2005 19:12 rimoy2 at cs dot com

Boy I almost pee on my panties when I saw this picture such a terrific sense of humor...10+

$$$$$$ Thanks for the laugh...

by Rita Sat Apr 02, 2005 18:58 rimoy2 at cs dot com

We in the States love Diana and probably will love her forever.

Such a nice fine lady who was treated in the most despicable and unforgivable manner. But in spite of the love we all have for Diana, I think Charles is finally wearing the pants...

Concering Camila's look( reminds me a horse) and Charles' look (reminds me a woodpecker) boy I am so glad these two are not going to have kids...and hope will not think about any cloning or in vitro fertilization...

Have a nice one.

by just me sheelagh Sat Mar 26, 2005 16:33 sheelagh555 at btinternet dot com 01707372371

all this talk about a royal wedding
let them marry they have a right to be together
together forever .
in the middle of a pile of shit
after all they made di life a load of shit
and she was better than they can ever be
he should do the right thing marry the cow and give up all rights to the throne
at least his ungle was a decent man when he married for love he give up the throne and the pepole still loved him
but no one loves charles he is a adulter and a ugly nasty piece of work and she is not fit to be a stepmum to di boys
the queen has devoted her life to this country
and she deserves a better son to carry on after her
i wish elizabeth could out live charles that would be the best way

by South African Friend of Ireland Tue Mar 08, 2005 17:41

It is reported that Camilla is delighted with the wedding arrangements, but has politely declined an offer from the Queen for a weekend in Paris complete with car and chaffeur.

by barry Mon Mar 07, 2005 23:37

Is actually less scary looking than yer wan.

by P O Neill - Royal Mail UK Sun Mar 06, 2005 23:10 "lick that puss in booties!"

“We do stamps for major occasions and important events in the life of the UK. Royal Mail only make announcements and discuss stamps when we go through all our approval processes.”

source-
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=4218040

by Royalist Mon Feb 28, 2005 17:08

It looks more like Mary Coughlan, Minister for Agriculture.

by ren Mon Feb 28, 2005 16:57

Hey thats not bareback, he's using a saddle for his horsey play. call yourself a discerning fetishist, pshaw.

by Rupert Maxwell - News of the Wile Mon Feb 28, 2005 16:40

In a scoop not sseen since the Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee candid pics, News of the Wile can reveal these exclusive pics of up-Chuck and Camomile riding bareback. Phwew!

by puss in bootiiiiiis. Mon Feb 28, 2005 14:16

An interview with Charles a year after the death of the the mother to the young english princes William and Harry which he gave in Sofia Bulgaria was published over the weekend. He alledged that the british public tortured him and lack compassion.
http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=45102
Clarence house the spin doctors for Charles have refused to pass comment on this interview which has surfaced at a bad time for them.

Meanwhile the right wing press in Britain are now splitting their time between opposing Blair and warning Charles to stop being a self-pitying prince just like in Shrek, and reminding him that should he continue to want all the cake and eat it, the British Republic is on the way.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/16925009?source=Evening%20Standard
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=339456&in_page_id=1770

Meanwhile down under where republican sentiments are stronger than ever since this game began, the media snubbed Charles during his visit there (right now) to focus on the lovely young in love couple of Denmark Mary and Frederick instead.
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/02/27/australia.royals.reut/

The Church of England has meanwhile amidst serious discussions of schism with the anglican church in North America discussed in Ireland last week under the chairmanship of the former chaplain of TCD as it happens, have confirmed that they won't allow the Telly to record any of this stuff. Many of them are also doing their best to remind everyone that they "fellow travel" with the Pope.

sin é.
Dr Rev Paisley for his part has not said how a british republic would effect the union should it happen.

by puss in booties Wed Feb 23, 2005 04:05

has announced that she will not attend the civil marriage ceremony planned for the 8th day of the 4th month in the guildhall of windsor.

She will however attend the anglican blessing of the relationship afterwards, in her multiple roles as -
Temporal Head of the Church of England.
Mother of the Groom.
Grandmother to the two new stepchildren.
Title holder to the chapel.

fair play to her.

by puss in bootes Tue Feb 22, 2005 14:10

Legal experts have confirmed that the annoyance to the Queen of Engurland which the moving of the civil ceremony (of doubtful legality) from the chapel of St George Windsor Castle, to the guildhall registry office of the royal borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, could be alleviated somewhat were the happy couple to abandon the land of the rose and go north and do their thing in the land of the thistle.

http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=198282005
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005082510,00.html

Meanwhile a free press title in spain has opened a telephone poll on belief ghosts as conspiracy "shadowy images" were recorded at the entrance to Windsor Tower the 32 storey block in central Madrid which burnt down sunday 12th of feb. Most people though don't believe in ghosts, and tippy toppy conspiracy theorists are now focussing on the idea that a dodgy Microsoft Xbox was left plugged in on the 21st floor instead.

what more is there to say? Oh yes, Charles the prince of neighbouring state cymru will not have a best man at his wedding. (apparantly the justice for fathers dude is banged up at the moment).
And beyond that, the course of true love goes on, as it always did, front page news, mugs and souvenirs plates, memories, wicked step mothers and not a peep more out of my daft Lord St John of fawsley. There will not be, (repeat no! geraldine) any honeymoon snaps britney style.

by puss in booties Fri Feb 18, 2005 00:22

The wedding ceremony on the 8t day of the 4th month will not be celebrated in windsor castle as previously advertised, due to the lack a license for the castle to do that sort of thing.
The couple shall accordingly be crossing the road to sign the registry in Windsor guildhall.
You can catch up on all this in the european gossip and celebrity press.

by harry's game Mon Feb 14, 2005 21:40

The Clarence House set have dismissed claims from a university of Oxford fellow and chair that the forthcoming marriage is illegal, claims which have found place in a BBC panorama documentary.

The Clarance House team have been familiar to most of the rat pack and polo playing set for years now. Their star spokesman Lord St John of Fawlsey has confirmed that Camila will become Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland.

However as the news of the illegality of the proposed civil marriage hit the Australian media today, the republican movement there naturally gained momentum.

Meanwhile in Scotland there has long been a certain loathing of the idea of any prince charlie other than the bonnie claiming 3rd position in any pony race.

Certainly all experts agree in Shakesperian fashion "the duke of Cornwall may marry whomever he wants" but the "crown" is a different matter, having long been a symbolic "truce" between most of those factions with interest in both commons and peers of the realms of those islands. Is it desirable that a man who has expressed the wish to alter the title granted his predeccesor by the Pope, of "Defender of the Faith" which satisfies his Roman Catholic, Anglican and Presbytarian fellow nationals to "defender of all faiths" in some sort of very passé homage to 1960s dead scot peers abbey road?

Next up in the Clarance House set to defend the proposed marriage will be Billy Connoly.

Next up in opposition will be the Scottish nationalist Mr Sean Connery.

Now you Shrek fans tell us what happens next.

by Barry Mon Feb 14, 2005 16:24

About as much chance as Eoghain Harris and Ruth Dudley Edwards leading a suicide attack on the British embassy to the strains of Oro se do bheatha bhaile.

Wearing Che Guevara t shirts.

by Burke's Peerage Mon Feb 14, 2005 15:21

There is a theory that in the early 60's Lizzie got a bit peed off with Phil the Greek's goating about and got a bit of her own back. This does explain the gap between Anne/Charles and Andrew/Edward and also the fact that the two younger kids don't look anything like Phil.

But judge for yourself, the info is here.

http://www.throneout.com/royal_affairs.asp

by constitutional experts Mon Feb 14, 2005 14:52

Constitutional experts were shocked to learn today that a member of the Royal Family of Engurland may not legally marry in a civil ceremony.

Apparantly they're excluded from such types of union, under the Marriage Act of 1836 which allowed for civil marriages in England for the first time, with the exemption of the Royal Family. It was updated in 1949 when no specific changes were made to the royal exemption.

Dr Stephen Cretney QC, Emeritus Fellow of Legal History, Oxford University, said he found it impossible to understand how a civil marriage for the couple in England could be legal.

You can catch up on all this at through the BBC
Panorama program. or at the Scotsman.

It is possible for Mr Charles Windsor to marry in Ireland however, where recent changes to the Marriage act allow him as a fellow EU citizen to marry whomever he wants.

Should he renounce his claim on the throne of Engurland, Scotland, Cymru and wee presbytarian Ulster, he may of course marry as planned in a registry office. If that's really what he wants to do.
Who's going to get in his way like?

by pat c Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:13

"4th: Andrew - Doubts over parentage. Divorced.
5th: Edward - Doubts over parentage. Pretty Vacant."

please elucidate on the doubts re parentage? i wonder if it was mountbatten? hes wasnt called uncle dicky for nothing!

by kintama Sat Feb 12, 2005 01:10

every time I see the glamorous couple I chuckle over the 'Have I got News For You' show which pictured the paramilitary prince astride a water buffalo somewhere in South East Asia with his trusted servant Peter Parker Bowles walking alongside.
I believe it was Paul Merton who came out with the immortal quote,'Prince Charles breaking in another old buffalo for Peter Parker Bowles'.

by bachs peerage Fri Feb 11, 2005 21:35

yes well quite, but we're hardly constitutional experts are we? it must be remembered that a direct ancestor of Camila was the long term lover "sentimental friend", "one true love" of a direct descendent of Charles, so in way its just taken them or the constitution (NO! NO! NO!) about a century to get to the sort of "d'ya love this yang wan? really luv 'er? well get down on your knee and say it!" sort of stuff which quite nicely has taken all the attention of the pope in rome who can rest unmolested by global media and get his voice in order for the irish "big really good mass" gig later this year. Not that such familial hypocrisy would be recognisable to the Irish who happily and resolutely left such peasant notions of suitability behind them at the time of the French revolution and enjoyed thanks to their enlightened understanding of love in all its forms, home rule under Parnell and the wit of Oscar until his seventieth year.

by Brookes Peerage Fri Feb 11, 2005 17:25

Would they not be better of finding a suitably virginal brood mare for the Wills lad?

Look at it this way: -

Lizzie - Queen, Current Monarch

1st in line: Charles - Mad, talks to botanical specimens, divorced.
2nd: Wills - Seems relatively sensible and normal, afaik.
3rd: Harry - Doubts over parentage. Dim and drunken dopehead.
4th: Andrew - Doubts over parentage. Divorced.
5th: Edward - Doubts over parentage. Pretty Vacant.
6th: Anne - Divorced and re-married. Does not have penis, so way down list despite being perhaps best qualified person to take over mother's role.

Not saying I have any problems with who is parent of who, but the whole basis of 'Royalty' centres on this. So if you study the above list it is obvious their old canard about being divorced had to be overlooked - else most of these people would drop off the list. If Wills fell off the twig tomorrow the options would be Harry and then Edward.

Abolish the lot of 'em!

by barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 16:27

At least she comes from a stable background.

by pat c Fri Feb 11, 2005 16:24

I fear the effect she will have on the Guards horses. I believe the sight of her finished off Sefton, he who survived the bombing.

by Barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 16:19

Fit yon oul mare with one, and make her keep it on for jaysus sake.

Shed better watch she doesnt end up hitched to the carriage instead of the prince.

by pat c Fri Feb 11, 2005 16:16

Will they serve horse d'oeuvres at the wedding?

by Barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 16:08

Some of those conspiracy theorists have tunnel-vision. Unlike HRH they should belt up, and not be afraid to meet this head on.
Its like beating your head against a brick wall sometimes.

by pat c Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:38

Theres a Di conspiracy killing debate at the link.

by pat c Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:35

"Something about "mangled in the wind " or such like."

"Mangled in the bend" maybe?

Wasnt some group called the Renault 4 suspected of being involved?

Seriously though, there more and more evidence emerging that Henri Paul wasnt drunk or doped. Or so I am led to believe by all those Discovery Channel documentaries!

by Barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:33

Will he be sniffling at the back of the church, saying "Bitch" through clenched teeth.

Or will he be jumping out of a cake with a rose between his teeth at Charles stag-night ?

by number 2 Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:26

are very happy that speculation of number 1 john paul 2 being replaced by one of his number 2s earlier this week, have now given way to speculation that Charles in wedding number 2, to the former number 3 will not in any way effect his role as CofE number 1 when he inherits the crown from Elizabeth 2 who is number 1 now, and that its ok since his wife number 1 is dead, and so Myers the number 1 number 2 can't complain about the morality in this weeks sunday telegraph.

Meanwhile british constitutional experts sinn fein number 1 Mr Adams and DUP number 1 Rev Dr Paisley have not denied or confirmed the crises which is effecting the union so its like ok, being married is nice and watching old really rich people who are anti GM food snog other really rich old people on telly is sexier than the usual shite we get forcefed.

by Barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:21

Thats awful.

Your a bigger cad and a bounder than HRH big ears for that one. How frightfully beastly.

Ill bet that gobshite Elton John didnt write that one. Quite an improvement on that other one.
Something about "mangled in the wind " or such like.

by pat c Fri Feb 11, 2005 15:15

Reminds me of a tune about Di.

Bye, Bye, Dodi and Di
Drove the Merc to the Tunnel
But they couldn't get by
And Henri Paul was drinking Whisky and Rye
Singing this will be the day that you die...
This will be the day that you die..
Die, Die, Dodi & Di
(repeat ad nauseum)

by Barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 14:54

She looks more like that skeleton boyo on the front of the Iron Maiden albums. A dead ringer.

by South African Friend of Ireland Fri Feb 11, 2005 07:21

What a bloody waste of time and money. Let us not forget that it is, and always has been, their ilk who have caused all the trouble for Ireland. All the little sheep throughout the world will be swallowing all the garbage spewed out by the western media about these two pathetic creatures. Camilla may look like a horse, but Charles is probably one of the finest specimens of in - breeding ever produced.

by barry Fri Feb 11, 2005 01:48

Viewers were asked whether they had any interest in the British royal wedding

3 percent said yes

97 percent said NO

But we'll still be bombarded with the nonsense any way. The Irish media says were supposed to be interested, so thats it apparently.

by barry Thu Feb 10, 2005 22:52

Such a pity his first true love never worked out. But good butlers are hard to come by I suppose.

I hope himself and Godzilla features have a lovely honey moon - in Iraq for instance.

by moralist Thu Feb 10, 2005 20:49

will be asking the important question of whether any children of this union will be legitimate in the eyes of the Irish Times readers and workers.

by pat c Thu Feb 10, 2005 13:36

This is also being discussed at:

by Queen Mothers Teeth Thu Feb 10, 2005 13:09

As I remember the jug-eared old Para-prince/site wanted to be the wicked old stepmothers tampon.

He'd better do something about those big wings at the side of his head then if he wants to fufill that particular jolly of his.

by pat c Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:54

You are also a bounder! but Ugly Stepmother is perhaps more accurate!

by pat c Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:48

The memory of Princess Di must be upheld! I am organising a picket of the wedding.

How about changing the headline to "Man Marries Horse"?

by provo lover Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:38

indy goes hello magazine. get this shit off

by Devil Dog Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:27

You sound like you went to Eton then joined the Brigade of Guards!

Anyway, more like a case of the Prince leaving Cinderella for the really ugly stepmother...although I'm sure she's a lovely person!

by Noel Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:12

This thread won't go down too well with the Provo lovers on this site.

Sure the Irish will be supporting English football teams next.

by pat c Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:52

He behaved in a swinish way towards Di! Perhaps the only case of a Prince leaving Cinderella for the Ugly Sister!

by Martina Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:45

I know they get slagged off a lot, but they've had a tough time the two of them. Hopefully this will be a new beginning for them