Ukraine Shoots Down F-16 With Patriot, A... Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:53 | Anti-Empire
Surprise Offensive Puts 300 km² of Russ... Fri Aug 09, 2024 08:44 | Marko Marjanović
The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Deptartment of Psychiatry is so corrupt that when David Stephen says "The Government can do anything... Wed Aug 14, 2024 11:41 | dop
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left Human Rights in Ireland >>
Free Speech Union and Fair Cop Threaten Yvette Cooper With Court Action Over Her Calls to Ramp Up Re... Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:00 | Richard Eldred The Free Speech Union and Fair Cop have threatened the Home Secretary with legal action over her calls to ramp up the recording of 'non-crime hate incidents'.
The post Free Speech Union and Fair Cop Threaten Yvette Cooper With Court Action Over Her Calls to Ramp Up Recording of ?Non-Crime Hate Incidents? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Bank of England Staff Told to Share Pronouns and Use ?Gender Neutral? Language Sun Sep 01, 2024 09:00 | Will Jones Bank of England staff have been told to share their pronouns at the start of meetings and use "gender neutral" language when speaking to customers.
The post Bank of England Staff Told to Share Pronouns and Use “Gender Neutral” Language appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Government?s Private Schools VAT Raid ?Risks Costing Taxpayer £1.8bn? Sun Sep 01, 2024 07:00 | Will Jones The Government?s VAT raid on private schools risks costing the taxpayer up to £1.8 billion as parents cut their work hours once their children move into the state sector, a report has found.
The post Government’s Private Schools VAT Raid “Risks Costing Taxpayer £1.8bn” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sun Sep 01, 2024 01:04 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Domestic Abuse Charity Allows ?Men Who Identify as Women? to Apply for £47,000-a-Year ?Women-Only? R... Sat Aug 31, 2024 15:00 | Will Jones A domestic abuse charity has been criticised for encouraging "men who identify as women" to apply for a senior £47,000-a-year "women-only" post.
The post Domestic Abuse Charity Allows “Men Who Identify as Women” to Apply for £47,000-a-Year “Women-Only” Role appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°97 Fri Aug 30, 2024 12:14 | en
The New Iranian Foreign Policy Fri Aug 30, 2024 12:12 | en
Press lies about the Venezuelan presidential election, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Aug 27, 2024 06:59 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°96 Fri Aug 23, 2024 15:28 | en
China chooses international law, distances itself from Israel and reunifies the ... Fri Aug 23, 2024 15:18 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Vote against the EU, vote ‘none of the above’!
international |
eu |
opinion/analysis
Sunday April 11, 2004 19:07 by Dusnieworld - Eurodusnie
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
The text below is by Dusnieworld, the global working group of the Eurodusnie collective based in Leiden, the Netherlands. Dusnieworld urges people to vote in the upcoming EU elections, however not for a political party, but for ‘none of the above’. Vote against the EU, vote ‘none of the above’!
The European elections will be held in the Netherlands on the 10th of June 2004. On this date (and on the 13th of June in some other countries) the European Union (EU) member states will each elect their share of 736 parliamentary seats. The number of seats a country gets depends on the amount of inhabitants in that particular country. During the last European elections, only thirty percent of the Dutch electorate bothered to vote. The media and politicians blame the low turnout mainly on voter disinterest and laziness. People are also supposedly not aware of what the European Union means for them. The text below is by Dusnieworld, the global working group of the Eurodusnie collective based in Leiden, the Netherlands. Dusnieworld urges people to vote in the upcoming EU elections, however not for a political party, but for ‘none of the above’.
The European parliament: a toothless tiger
The European parliament roars now and again, but doesn’t have the teeth to actually bite with. The real seat of power in Europe is not the European parliament but the (unelected) European Commission, the Council of the European Union (formerly the Council of Ministers, consisting of representatives of all the member states) and last but not least, the multinational corporations. The European parliament has no decision-making power over most policy areas. Although the European Constitution would for example make the European parliament joint legislator on asylum and justice, this is nothing to be glad about. The same Constitution defines Europe as a union of capitalist states. In other words, we shouldn’t be under any illusions about the democratic credentials of this future super state. After the implementation of the Constitution, choice will more than ever be limited to one between puppets.
European democracy is a farce
Parliamentary democracy is a way of institutionalising the existing fundamental unequal distribution of wealth and welfare in the world. The various ways parliamentary democracy offers ‘participation’ in decision-making (such as elections and consultations) are meant to quiet, absorb and neutralise criticism. We can all join in the discussion, but the ruling elite will do what they want anyway. In any case, capitalist society lacks the most elementary conditions which true democratic decision-making processes require. There is, for example, no multiform media or socio-critical education system. In the Netherlands, for example, the three biggest newspaper publishers have ninety percent of the market share. The situation is the same or sometimes worse in other European countries. Diversity in reporting is also hard to come by. Although there are exceptions, the mass media behaves like the ruling elite’s lackey. Education is increasingly serving trade and industry and promoting neo-liberal ideology. This is reason enough to be able to conclude that it’s fairly impossible to form an independent opinion.
Even the very idea of administering a continent of hundreds of millions of people from one central institution is ludicrous and anti-democratic in itself. People already complain, and rightly so, that they have no control over how they are governed and that politicians don’t listen to them. This situation will only get worse when more or less all important decisions are made in Brussels.
The Parliamentary Left offers no alternative
Some say that it’s better to vote for a left-wing party than not to vote at all. The assumption is that if enough people vote for a party of the Left, this will at least put the breaks on the swing to the Right. This is an illusion, also for other reasons than already mentioned. The parliamentary Left offers neither an ideological nor strategic perspective worthy of any support. Social democracy, for example, is capitalism with a human side. Under their leadership, the welfare state has been dismantled everywhere in Europe. Green Left parties aren’t questioning capitalism either, and have placed their bets on strengthening the European Parliament and the formation of a federal Europe of nation states. At the same time they are fighting to defend what is left of the welfare state.
(Post) communist parties are on an increasingly nationalist drive. Their alternative to a capitalist EU is a Europe of collaborating peoples, wherein each nation is led by an all-powerful state.
What connects the various left-wing parties is the idea that building up their party and participating in elections will lead to them seizing state power, this in contrast to anti-authoritarians, who strive to radically decentralise power.
What’s more, the European Union won’t let itself be reformed because of the same reason that capitalism with a human side doesn’t exist. Profits, not people, are the main concern of the EU and of capitalism. Neither are part of the solution but are part of the problem, and therefore must be torn down.
Voting is giving permission
By voting in the European elections you are primarily giving your approval to the whole EU project. You choose a party based on an election programme. After the elections, the votes are counted and seats divided between the different parties. The possibility of voting for one part of an election programme and not for another doesn’t exist. When you vote in the European elections you give a political party the mandate to talk and deal on your behalf for a five year term. If you change your mind about your choice at a later moment, there’s no possibility of retracting your mandate. If you are against the European Union and are of the opinion that no-one has the right to spout nonsense in the European parliament and make wrong decisions on your behalf, then there’s only one thing for it: vote for nobody!
They’re all the same
Although one party prefers to leave organising society to ‘the market’ and the other advocates an central role for the state, from Left to Right, all parties have one thing in common: support for a society where inequality between people is institutionalised and fundamental. Every political party assumes that a leaderless society is a synonym for chaos. Democracy is described by the political establishment as “the right of the people to choose their own government”, and not as “the right of each person to take part in the decision-making about matters which have consequences for their lives”.
The deep-rooted centralisation of power in society is the main reason why a small elite can make our lives so difficult. The world needs a process of radical decentralisation and redistribution of power in all areas of importance for society. The European Union and the European parliament will not help us achieve this. They are standing in the way of this process!
Vote against capitalist Fortress Europe: vote ‘none of the above’!
During the European elections you can tear up your ballot-paper of course or throw it away. You won’t be the only one with the urge to do this. At the last European elections, seventy percent of Dutch voters didn’t bother to make the trip to the polling station. Politicians and the media don’t portray these ‘no-show’ voters as protestors but as disinterested, lazy or stupid. Politicians will use your absence at the ballot box to emphasise their own indispensability. We therefore propose that you do make the effort to go to the polling station, not to vote for a party, but to vote ‘none of the above’ (‘blank’). A ‘blank’ vote is the clearest way of voting against capitalist Fortress Europe. By voting ‘none of the above’ you show that you are interested in the future of Europe, but that you do not entrust your future to the European Union. A ‘blank’ vote shows that you won’t settle for the parliamentary puppet show, that you demand real democracy where decentralisation and not centralisation of (all) social decision-making processes is fundamental. So let your voice be heard and vote ‘none of the above’!
You can react to this article at: http://eurodusnie.nl/2004/04/1065.shtml
Dusnieworld, Eurodusnie global working group
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6can't vote none of the above in evoting followed that story for a while don't know how it ended has anybody heard of this RON idea
they assume that everybody just made a mistake and pretend it never happened. the spoiled votes have no bearing on the final result or on the quotas needed to elect officials.
I would be totally supportive of an actual none of the above option on a ballot paper that would be counted and included in the final tally. that would at lewast be worthwhile, but i woul;d prefer not to sell my name and contact details to marketing companies (through the voting registrar) just to make a protest only noticed and cared about by one person, me. That is even if the electronic voting allows spoiled votes which is entirely unclear..
The article rightly critisises the social democrat, 'communist' and green-left parties that will be standing candidates across Europe in June. These parties do offer no rel alternative and have long sold out. If the only parties on the left that are standing are from these people shoudl not accept the 'lesser of two evils' approach and they shoudl abstain. However in Dublin there is a candidate that is not from these sell out parties and is a person that has a proven track record of struggle among the working class. That candidate is Joe Higgins. I think if people want to deliver a message in these elections to the establishment they should vote Joe Higgins and not abstain.
Although Joe may not be my choice ( sayin' ) I prefer the idea of putting forward suitable candidates and building a strong voice within an inevitable process.
I would argue that bourgeois democracy is limited and it should only be engaged in as a means of building your forces in the communities and in the workplaces as ultimately if the ruling class thought an election would see the election of a government that would serioulsy challenge the interests of capital they would simply cancel the elections or rig them. change will come on the streets not primarily in the ballot box. In saying all this to neglect elections is wrong. There are thousands of workers in Ireland that are looking to these elections as a way of registering their discontent against the government and the establishment parties. To sit on the sidelines and preach about 'the blind alley of bourgeois democracy' while not putting a credible and immediately realisable alternative to bourgeois democracy forward is simply childish rantings. At the moment the revolution is still a bit away, people still look towards elections therefore activists shoudl stand in elections and use them as a chance to try to win over people to our position. That is why I will be voting Joe Higgins and will not be abstaining.
Joe Higgins, Socialist Party TD for Dublin West, who spent a month in jail last Autumn for fighting the bin tax, will be the Socialist Party's candidate in the European election for the Dublin constituency on 11 June.
The Socialist Party will fight the election on the general theme of the need to build a democratic, socialist Europe where the needs of working people come before the ruthless drive for profits by the multinational corporations. In particular, we stand against the privatisation agenda of the E.U. Commission, that is fully accepted by the FF/PD Government. The privatisation of our telecom industry shows graphically what privatisation is all about. Ordinary people were badly burned after being persuaded by huge propaganda to buy shares when Telecom Eireann was being sold off. The company inevitably passed over to billionaire capitalists who now make a fortune from a resource that properly belongs to the Irish people.
Big business in the E.U. forms powerful lobbies such as the "European Round Table of Industrialists". They have ready access to the E.U. Commission whom they meet regularly and to the national governments. In reality these lobbies dictate E.U. policy, which puts pressure on for privatisation and which attacks systematically the rights and conditions of public sector workers. It is these very same policies that are behind our Government's drive to privatise CIE, Aer Rianta, Aer Lingus and the postal system.
In many E.U. countries at present, there is a systematic attack on the pension rights of public sector workers. The Irish Government has just recently pushed though legislation that means workers like teachers and civil servants will not be able to get a pension until they are 65, no matter how many years' service they have.
In the European election campaign, the Socialist Party will be opposing all privatisation and calling for more investment in public services including in crucial areas like urban and rural transport. We want a major change in how public sector companies operate. We want democratic structures which bring the workers to the very heart of the management. We want these workers and users of the services to run them in order to provide quality public services with decent wages and conditions for the workers. This means kicking off the boards of state companies, the hacks appointed by the right wing political parties, who currently mismanage our public and semi-state companies.
The Socialist Party will raise the drive toward the militarisation of the EU as a crucial issue. Scandalously, the Irish Government is currently overseeing the co-ordination of an E.U. armaments industry as part of its Presidency of the E.U. Obscenely 55 billion euro is spent by E.U. Governments each year in the manufacture of weapons.
In the 1999 Euro election, Joe Higgins secured 10,4000 first preference votes. With much more awareness now about his record as an uncompromising fighter for ordinary people who went to jail rather than abandon the struggle against the bin tax, we hope for increased support. Winning a seat on this occasion would be a huge shock to the political establishment and a major upset in Irish politics.
While for us, the campaign and the debate on the issues are the most vital, if such an "earthquake" happened, Joe Higgins would continue to accept only the wage equivalent to an average industrial worker and any other income would, as now, go to funding the fight for building a socialist alternative in Ireland and internationally.