Dublin no events posted in last week
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
 RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Sun Jul 28, 2024 01:17 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech Sat Jul 27, 2024 19:00 | Sean Walsh
The sweeping House of Commons reforms proposed by Green MP Ellie Chowns are evidence that the Mrs Dutt-Pauker types have moved from Peter Simple's columns into public life. We're in for a bumpy ride, says Sean Walsh.
The post Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills Sat Jul 27, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
With heat pump numbers forecast to rise, the energy watchdog Ofgem has predicted that bills for those who continue using gas boilers will surge.
The post Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies Sat Jul 27, 2024 15:00 | David Turver
So much for Labour's pledge to cut energy bills by £300, says David Turver. Under GB Energy, our bills can only go one way, and that is up.
The post Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? Sat Jul 27, 2024 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Awful audio, bizarre performances, embarrassing gaffes and a woke 'Last Supper' parody that has outraged Christians turned the Paris Olympics opening ceremony into a rain-soaked disaster.
The post Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
sectarianism in Merseyside police
 dublin |
rights, freedoms and repression |
press release
 Thursday November 06, 2003 11:13 by karen clark stapleton - MSC criminal justice researcher karen622207855 at aol dot com
Police mounted section religious bigotry or just plain ignorance Religion and Sectarianism in the Police, merely tradition or a continuum of misplaced bigotry?
In a plea to Parliament to reform the laws before it was too late, William Cole in 1659 argued that "The major part of the laws made in this nation are founded on principles of tyranny, fallacy and oppression for the benefit of those that made them" (Hill 1996, p 267). It is of course true that Parliament has been responsible for many major strides towards the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Thus it is possible, looking back at our history, to identify a number of groups who have been either unpopular or disregarded and whose rights and freedoms have as a result been of little or no Parliamentary interest: Jews, Roman Catholics, dissenters; vagrants, vagabonds, beggars, gypsies; married women; children; prisoners; mental patients and the disabled; immigrants of various kinds, asylum seekers, aliens; homosexuals; strikers; single mothers; paedophiles. Protection of human rights in this country has depended, to a very large extent, on common protection, the ordinary law of the land, which has not formulated a list of rights and freedoms, which may not be infringed. Rather, it has proscribed certain forms of conduct as unlawful, leaving the citizen free to do anything, which is not so proscribed. Such as freedoms to practice his or her religious beliefs without fear of attack, yet, within the police mounted section at one force, a tradition which is allowed to continue is that of sectarianism within the changing areas of police officers. One side of the room is set aside for Catholics or as they put it ‘knights of St Columbus’, and the other for Protestants, and it is made very clear to which side you shall change. Rosters are set with two officers from each side working on different days i.e., two Catholics, clean one day two protestants on alternate days, how can this be allowed to continue and what does it say for any modern day police force, the laws of equality and the employment practices that they indeed should apply effectively. Now when a question was posed to the Police Mounted Section over this issue they said “oh don’t worry about it, we all get on but you’ve gotta know which side your on, we all meet up at the match so it balances out, its just always been like that” The law has been slow and hesitant in recognising a tort of harassment and it is salutary to remind oneself what your basic human rights are: in short, the right to life; freedom from torture or inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment; freedom from slavery, servitude or forced or compulsory labour; the right to liberty and security of the person; the right to a fair trial; freedom from prosecution and punishment for offences not criminal at the time when they were done; the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence; freedom of thought, conscience and religion; freedom of expression; freedom of assembly and association; the right to marry and found a family; the right to an effective remedy; and the prohibition of discrimination in the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention. Yet clearly many police forces have been breaching these regulatory rules with impunity. What concerns me is the thought that if you belong to neither of these religious groups were do you get changed…in the toilets? This is bigotry at its best and shows the contempt this and indeed many forces have for law and order, for basic human rights and this confirms the public perception that the police continue to act above the law as and when it suits them. If this is how they treat their own officers then what hope is there for how they treat or mistreat members of the public and to what lengths will they indeed go to ensure there traditions continue whether good or bad?
On a similar notion is that of the continuation of sectarian groups that are permitted to infiltrate and flourish in an allegedly modern day police service that encourage religious hatred and sectarianism such as the Masons and The Knights of St Columbus,the Gay and Lesbian police Association, etc and many more. How can they be permitted to encourage membership when the very notion of equality is exactly which they do not stand for, some may even argue that the several societies that have opened up within this modern police service actually encourage secrecy, actually encourage inequality and bigotry. Surely a modern police service should not find it necessary to separate colour, religious belief or indeed sexual orientation, they should not find it necessary to promote on the grounds of anything other than merit. Furthermore the Home Office should not have permitted such a move, as it showed that the police service is not and never will be free from oppression of many differening minority groups. One must also consider that when an officer is facing allegations even of a trivial nature then there is always the question that will his or her fellow combatants from the same group assist in order to establish legitimacy for that particular association, It does happen and it will continue to happen so long as we continue to promote individualism within the police service. Lets look at it in another way… If a police constable was to admit to being a member of any fringe fascist association, would they be given the same credence as a member who is lets say…. a Mason, hardly, yet this goes against the fundamental principal of equality as all groups believe in the promotion of values they admire. If we are to fully modernise the police service we must allow all members of the service the same fundamental rights to join any association of their choosing providing the association is legal and as far as I am aware the many other similar groups are. If a police officer is not permitted to be a canvassing member of any political group then how can they justify them being a member of any group or association that meets in secrecy, that only actively allows membership from one religious order or one racial group? We do not have a whites only or English only Police Federation or association so why is it necessary to have a black and Asian police association, as this in reality does not encourage equality it discourages it on the basis of it permitting a fundamentally flawed participation in the police service as a whole. If as Police Officers they arrest members of the public for simply activating their freedom of speech in one particular area then how can they justify doing exactly the same but in a police uniform with the full consent of both their Chief Constable and the Police Authority, but ultimately with consent of Parliament through the Home Office. If the police service is to modernise it must begin with facing up to the reality that they are still locked in an antiquated past that does not allow for a wholesome environment whether that be in practice or theory. When one member of the old Labour Party referred to them as a necessary evil in society, that was not reflecting that they are evil , merely they are necessary as opposed to the fact that in a totally free society a police force would not be required. If they are to regain wholesome values within the service that promotes democratic values they must start with the flawed ethics that is continually allowed to permeate at the very heart of the service. Modernity requires forward thinking not backward shuffles !
Based on a facts from a once serving Merseyside Police Officer.
K Clark Stapleton.
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4Public must be aware that trials in uk judicial system will be affected by prejudice
Justice denied and a system that is fundamentally flawed causes concern.
By Karen Lesley Clark-Stapleton.
The essence of justice is being undermined through policy changes that will destroy impartial judicial process. Recent changes allowing retired police officers, civilian police staff, their spouses and also serving special constables has enabled all these types of persons to be recruited actively as magistrates. A recent advert openly recruiting them was seen in NARPO August 2003. This is appalling and undermines the essence of impartiality that should be shown within our courts.
To be judged by someone who openly associates either through an association for retired police officers or a fellow Mason is fundamentally wrong. It allows for active corruption from within the bench and being directed against any defendant. When one considers that only recently was it admitted that police officers are institutionally racist, and when one considers that it is imperative for any defendant to be judged with the utmost integrity and impartiality then, this beggars belief.
Police officers are not renowned for their honesty or their integrity and all will have performed some mistaken belief for a fellow colleague at some stage in their careers. This will create more anomalies within the judicial process at a time when it is hoped to alleviate sentence discrepancies which currently cause concern for most working or indeed entering the criminal justice system. One could use the analogy that it is like being judged by the Klu-Klux Klan if you are a black defendant or even having the same trial standing as those in Guantanemo bay........
need for testing of all police officers randomly
Drugtaking police officers and the need for accountability
04.08.2003 16:23
The importance of police behaviour when making arrests, does poor attitude cause crime and is there a necessity for mandatory drug testing of all police officers?
Much evidence exists were the character of the person the police arrest is laid bare, however not much evidence exists or indeed empirical research exist that examine the role the officer played when making the arrest and indeed whether his attitude was the explosive factor during this interaction with the public. In fact we are going to examine the decision to make arrest and why the need for this is paramount in order to prevent a division from police and its public which in UK may have already commenced.
Many of the research studies which have examined police decisions to arrest suspected offenders have tended to concentrate on detailed analyses of the characteristics of the persons arrested compared with those whom no formal action is taken by the police, and on the personal interaction which surrounds the arrest decision, alternatively other studies have focused on the organisational and occupational pressures upon the police to exercise their arrest discretion according to certain expectations, however we are aiming to re-address that imbalance and clarify how police behaviour is leading to arrests which will undoubtedly cause a division between the police and its public.
Skolnick (1966) found that during his research that the highest proportion of respondents(39%) gave ‘disrespectful behaviour’ as the reason for force being thought to be necessary in the arrest situation, directed particularly against the ‘ wise-guy’ who thinks he knows more than the officer, who talks back or insults the policeman. This is an important factor when considering rising crime figures because we must examine whether crime is actually rising or is it merely the police have lost their way and feel impotent, and are making arrests which in reality should not be occurring. An argument relative to this would validate the claim that the police are creating crime. Many arrests occur in the heat of a situation in which tempers are flared and as police officers are drawn from within the society they police they are as susceptible to this as any other member of society, however this creates an imbalance set firmly against the citizen. The police officers flared temper will not result in his or her arrest , the citizen wont have any redress, this is simply injust. Controlling any situation is paramount to settle and prevent any further possibility of a disturbance. In order to maintain control the role of the police is constantly being assessed and any imbalances or ambiguities found are counteracted, well thats what we would all like to believe, but in reality that is not the case. Assuming that police control and authority has been established in a particular situation , to what extent is there a secondary handling problem of what to do next?,as this is were many arrests occur, all seems quiet, but a simple misjudged statement made by the officer directed wrongly or thoughtlessly towards the suspected offender then a response that may be interpreted incorrectly will undoubtedly lead to an arrest. The arrest is usually for Breach of the Peace or assaulting a constable in the execution of his duty. No officer has been touched in reality but that is not important at this stage, what is more important is that the officer has gained respect (if even in his or her eyes only) and has gained control, or have they? Although power and control has been firmly re-established at this point is it maintainable and to what extent will his or her actions have both within the community with the officer and the future actions he or she will face, after all they too state clearly they are very much affected by stress. But in reality this type of stress is easily preventable and avoidable, as generally it has been solely the actions and in most cases the reactions which may result in the illegality of the actual arrest procedures that resulted in this situation, thus for many months the officer will suffer levels of stress related to the affects of his or her wrongful decision, and so easily avoidable. Quite often here I cannot help to remind myself of a certain phrase which struck a chord whilst investigating and researching policing and that was a simple line which appeared in the film Forest Gump, this related to many incidents I have witnessed and been told about during this research “Stupid is as stupid does” how very poignant ! To maintain excellent community relations the police need to be constantly aware of the attitudes they are expressing whilst in contact with the public. if they are repeatedly abusing this and arresting merely because the officer was unable to be dominant then respect will not be given freely and in fact the police will have to work to earn the same. If we compare the Guard outside Buckingham Palace who at times has to endure ridicule, berating and even common assaults then if he or she manages to restrain themselves why is it the police have a real difficulty in doing so. After observing many officers from both within the service and as a member of the public I noticed that many are reactive not proactive, they feel that we should respect the officer at all times even if the actions and attitudes being displayed are quite frankly intolerable.Once again it comes down to ‘cop-culture’ which eats away at the very heart of policing. The patrol officer who attends incidents in the community tends to perform a quasi-judicial role not unlike the magistrate, he makes a judgment without the necessary qualification to do so , his use of discretion is in many cases quite wrong, quite the same is the custody sergeant whose primary job is to assess whether a charge is acceptable similar to that of the examining magistrate as seen on the continent. It is fair to say that the police cannot enforce all the laws all of the time, but they can enforce the laws on an even keel. It is not good enough to say “I didn’t like the offender treating me like that” that is not justification for an arrest and will have little impact on crime, but it will ensure that an arrest is effected and that it will result in a clear up of that offence and thus the figures in the books balance, hardly prevention of crime more like creating crime in order to maintain a good set of books. Unfortunately most forces operate in this way.
If we move on to a point which will address whether it has become necessary to randomly test all police officers for the use of drugs whilst on duty then community policing becomes a relevant start point. Evidence suggests that 25% of the population have or are taking some form of drug , we are not going to distinguish between classes as this in reality merely blurs a situation that allows for excuses. Police officers as we have previously mentioned are drawn from the society within which they police, they are as susceptible as each of us to perform within the boundaries of the community, and therefore they will use drugs , tobacco , alcohol and sex at the same rates as any member of society. Here is were the need for distinction must occur. A police officer whilst on duty not a member of the public per se, he or she is allowed in law to rise above the simplistics of society and that is a necessity in order to maintain control and order. However, as technology improves and more legislation is passed that do not allow for the public to drive vehicles whilst being under the influence of drugs and facing a road side drugs test at the whim of a police constable in uniform, then the issue of mandatory drug testing of police officers become paramount. The prison service test offenders and also prison officers with what is termed a barringer drug test machine and urinary sampling, it uses the same technology as the roadside machines currently being tested . This machine does pick up on all forms of drug via a simple swab of the palm, but it is flawed in its usage, it also registers contamination from other sources such as bank notes , glasses in bars the list is endless. I have seen grandmothers in there nineties testing positive for cocaine and opium , they have been refused a visit with their relative in prison due to this contaminant found on the hand and on clothing they are wearing. With this occurring then it is an area of great concern. Police Officers use drugs this is a fact, to what extent nobody can be certain as they are not and have no mandate to test officers. The legality of roadside tests raises concern when it is clear that some form of cross contamination will occur. The Bank of England state that 20% of all bank notes currently in circulation are contaminated with some form of narcotic. When Police Officers search alleged offenders at the roadside they in general do not use gloves, they are merely trying to ascertain whether a weapon can be found so “rub-down”if that officer has used drugs and the effects are being secreted through sweat then cross contamination will occur. The simple fact of undressing will then contaminate the hands of the alleged offender. A vicious circle for many within the criminal justice system. Considering this it will become a matter of logistics as too how many criminals will be produced merely by inadequate police procedures . Once again we can see that the police will be creating crime not detecting it or clearing it up!, and to rid itself of the headaches of legal action all they need to do is test police officers using independent bodies. Otherwise it may lead to corruption by officers whose habits would undoubtedly result in a dismissal from a very well paid job. For any Chief Constable to state his or her officers do not use drugs would simply be a lie and so would it not be a positive recommendation for the Home Office to regulate poor procedure by having mandatory drug testing of all police officers. The police are not above the law , they are part of it the sooner they realise this, the reality of malpractice , corruption, ill discipline. poor leadership can be addressed. It goes without saying that the Police Federation and ACPO will be totally against this , what they need to consider is this scenario....
A police officer is called to a house , a noise can be heard. The officer hears a male shouting, and a female screaming “Hes got a gun”. The officer had taken a line of cocaine prior to coming on duty, just to get him or her through that dreaded night shift. He is armed with CS gas and a truncheon, his adrenaline is rushing, he cannot hear the TV on, the female shouts “OH NO”. The male says “Die Fucker Die” The officer rushes inside the house , he draws his CS gas and his truncheon, he bludgeons the male, the woman screams at him “What are you doing get off him” The officers is in total panic he attacks the female shouting “Get Down you stupid bitch” . Realistically the couple were watching a film, they had had a glass of beer, the film was rather good, but due to the influence of a drug the officer misinterpreted the situation. Unfortunately the male has a thin skull and is dead. The woman , his wife is pregnant with five other children.Imagine the scenario with a fast resonse police car ! Wouldn’t you rather see the mandatory testing of all police officers ?
Many police officers currently take some form of drug, these range from anabolic steroids used in gyms to cocaine to ‘poppers’ to cannabis. They do it during their days off, they do it whilst at the bars in police stations they do it just like everyone else, realistically though they are less likely to be charged with possession merely due to ‘cop -culture’ and this is wrong. Effective policing must start with effective management of a police service, this will involve some harsh reality that the police are not above the law and must learn to live with it , both in application and adherence. I look forward to the mandatory testing of all officers on a regular basis . Respect demands respect but this requires humility, something the service is devoid of .
Karen Clark Stapleton
arrests in Uk are up , but are they caued by corrupt cops, is crime being caused by police officers ?
Police behaviour needs more scrutiny
04.08.2003 16:20
The importance of police behaviour when making arrests, does poor attitude cause crime?
Much evidence exists were the character of the person the police arrest is laid bare, however not much evidence exists or indeed empirical research exist that examine the role the officer played when making the arrest and indeed whether his attitude was the explosive factor during this interaction with the public. In fact we are going to examine the decision to make arrest and why the need for this is paramount in order to prevent a division from police and its public which in UK may have already commenced.
Many of the research studies which have examined police decisions to arrest suspected offenders have tended to concentrate on detailed analyses of the characteristics of the persons arrested compared with those whom no formal action is taken by the police, and on the personal interaction which surrounds the arrest decision, alternatively other studies have focussed on the organisational and occupational pressures upon the police to exercise their arrest discretion according to certain expectations, however we are aiming to re-address that imbalance and clarify how police behaviour is leading to arrests which will undoubtedly cause a division between the police and its public.
Skolnick (1966) found that during his research that the highest proportion of respondents(39%) gave ‘disrespectful behaviour’ as the reason for force being thought to be necessary in the arrest situation, directed particularly against the ‘ wise-guy’ who thinks he knows more than the officer, who talks back or insults the policeman. This is an important factor when considering rising crime figures because we must examine whether crime is actually rising or is it merely the police have lost their way and feel impotent, therefore they are making arrests which in reality should not be occuring. An argument relative to this would validate the claim that police are creating crime .Many arrests occur in the heat of a situation in which tempers are flared and as police officers are drawn from the society they police they are as susceptible to this as any other member of society, however this creates an imbalance set firmly against the citizen. The police officers flared temper will not result in his or her arrest , the citizen wont have any redress , this is simply injust. Controlling any situation is paramount to settle and prevent any further possibility of a disturbance. In order to maintain control the role of the police is constantly being assessed and any imbalances found are counteracted, well thats what we would all like to believe . Assuming that police control and authority have been established in a particular situation , to what extent is there a secondary handling problem of what to do next? This is were many arrests occur, all seems quiet, but a simple misjudged statement made by the officer directed wrongly or thoughtlessly towards the suspected offender then interpreted incorrectly will undoubtedly lead to an arrest. The arrest is usually for Breach of the Peace or assaulting a constable in the exectution of his duty. No officer has been touched in reality but that is not important at this stage, what is more important is that the officer has gained respect (if even in his eyes only) and he has gained control. His power has been firmly established, and when he gets back to his colleagues he is once again a man amongst men. Unfortunately this will have a lasting effect upon community relations and how the public see the role of policing within its community. To maintain excellent community relations the police need to be constantly aware of the attitudes they are expressing whilst in contact with the public. if they are constantly abusing this and arresting merely because the officer was unable to be dominant then respect will not be given freely and in fact the police will have to work to earn the same.
Karen Clark Stapleton
and nice try at appearing sane, but your reference to "the Gay and Lesbian police Association" as a sectarian group that promotes religious hatred gives the game away. You are in all likelihood a fascist moron. You want us to feel sorry for the fash being victimised in the police force, do you? They are utter scum and so are you to be peddling this nonsense.
I hope to see y'all at Trinity next week, we can, ahem, 'discuss' things further then.