Public Consultation / Irish Social Forum Irish Nurse Reveals What Really Went On In Hospitals During The Pandemic 00:10 Jun 23 0 comments Dr Robert Malone inventor of mRNA Vaccines Gives Important Speech on Censorship, the WHO and WEF 22:26 May 31 0 comments ERSI / Economists Call for deeper cuts 10:40 Sep 01 0 comments The Case for Irish Drug Policy Reform 02:16 Aug 30 2 comments Australian Climate Scientists Get Death Threats. 21:21 Jun 08 26 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
British Drivers Steering Away From New Cars In Their Droves Mon Dec 23, 2024 13:00 | Sallust
Britain on Brink of Recession After Growth Revised to Zero Following Reeves?s Horror Budget Mon Dec 23, 2024 11:09 | Will Jones
What Fresh Hell is This? The Climate and Nature Bill Mon Dec 23, 2024 09:00 | Paul Homewood
The Daily Sceptic Christmas Appeal Mon Dec 23, 2024 07:00 | Toby Young
News Round-Up Mon Dec 23, 2024 01:12 | Richard Eldred
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionVoltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en |
March 2024 Referendum explained in just over 10 minutes -Why You Should Vote No
national |
public consultation / irish social forum |
opinion/analysis
Thursday March 07, 2024 21:52 by indy
This video by lawyer Una McGurk explains what the March 2024 two referendums are about and why you should vote No. Basically these changes give no additional rights and do nothing for the public but what they do is take away rights. Interesting the phrase "durable relationships" which they want to insert are not even defined and can and will be interpreteted by the courts So why did the government rush the legislation through blocking any proper debate and scrutiny. They are not known for doing things for our benefits but for the corporate sponsors This rule also has massive implications to inheritance and who in a "durable" relationship is now entitled to inheritance Michael M Dowell -former attorney general has created the Lawyers for No campaign too See https://www.michaelmcdowell.ie/lawyers-for-no-document-family-and-care-referendume.html See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxl4gU4Ts-s For future reference here is their document Caption: Video Id: sYWeHmzJVh8 Type: Youtube Video Caption: Video Id: Wxl4gU4Ts-s Type: Youtube Video |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1And the results are the referendum was defeated with 67% voting No
The turnout was relatively high for a referendum at 44.4 %
The only areas with a strong Yes vote were all the middle class woke constituencies which just goes to prove the point that the middle class are the most propagandized group of people. Everywhere else it was firmly rejected as people saw the ruse for what it was.
Details at https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2024/0309/1436882-referendum/