Upcoming Events

Galway | Anti-War / Imperialism

no events match your query!

New Events


no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds



offsite link Trump Is Conditioning Removal of Sudan S... Tue Sep 29, 2020 18:02 | The New Arab

offsite link Syria’s “Moderate Rebels” Say Turk... Tue Sep 29, 2020 16:19 | Bethan McKernan

offsite link An ‘Egregious and Unforgivable Form of... Tue Sep 29, 2020 13:57 | Colin Butler

offsite link 3,500 American Companies Sue Trump Admin... Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:38 | David Shepardson

offsite link Wokeism Is Class War of the Upper Middle... Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:15 | Rob Henderson

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Azerbaijani-Armenian War: Turkish F-16s Enter The Game. Armenia Threatens To Use Iskander Missiles Tue Sep 29, 2020 21:34 | amarynth
South Front The Armenian-Azerbaijani war continues raging in the South Caucasus. As of September 29, the Azerbaijani advance in the Nagorno-Karabakh region struck the Armenian defense and Azerbaijani forces were

offsite link China deploys Sun Tzu to prevail in the Chip War Tue Sep 29, 2020 18:26 | amarynth
by Pepe Escobar with permission – first posted at Asia Times Let?s cut to the chase: with or without a sanction juggernaut, China simply won?t be expelled from the global

offsite link Come what may, I must reveal the identity of the NY Times? Trump tax leaks Tue Sep 29, 2020 15:22 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog So there I was again on the ?Job Creator?s Red-Eye? (NYC to Silicon Valley) and I made this fateful, election-shaping decision. The reality

offsite link Armenian-Azerbaijani War Rages In South Caucasus Mon Sep 28, 2020 22:47 | amarynth
South Front On September 27, a new regional war in South Caucasus arose from the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over the contested Nagorno-Karabakh region. Pro-Armenian forces captured the region in the early

offsite link The mortal battle of the Perfidious Albion Mon Sep 28, 2020 19:40 | amarynth
By Katerina for the Saker Blog In this my third and hopefully last essay I will try to analyse an ingrained and totally unresolvable animosity between England and Russia. Here

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

offsite link Irish Examiner bias Anthony

offsite link RTE: Propaganda ambush of Sinn Fein Anthony

offsite link Hong Kong and democracy Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

offsite link UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

GAAW February 2012 Bulletin

category galway | anti-war / imperialism | opinion/analysis author Wednesday February 08, 2012 22:33author by Galway Alliance Against War Report this post to the editors

The regular bulletin from the Galway Alliance Against War



Follow us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/312442090965/











‘“The opposition outside the country [the Syrian National Council] should support the opposition inside the country [Building the Syrian State] not the other way around.” Exiles have “seized control” and the opposition inside the country are “still trying to get it back”…. “Negotiations are the only way” to resolve the situation. The SNC should not reject talks with the government. “All key players must be involved…..Any solution must provide for equal treatment for minorities and recognition of national sovereignty and security. The Russian and Chinese vetoes in the UN Security Council….could have a positive effect by forcing “Syrians to solve their problems by themselves….We are trying to unite the international opposition behind a common programme which promotes negotiations, prepares for the transition and rejects external intervention….The games people are playing in Syria are growing increasingly dirty.…There is a lot of exaggeration” of casualties…particularly on the part of the exile groups…this was especially true…with reports of government attacks on Homs only hours ahead of the [UN Security] council vote.’ Dr Mona Ghannem of the Syrian-based opposition Building the Syrian State (http://binaa-syria.com/B/en ) in an interview with Michael Jansen in the Irish Times 7th February 2012.

The drums of war are beating once more. NATO and its friendly dictators in Saudi Arabia and Qatar are hoping to intervene in Syria as they did in Libya. All feign concern for civilian life as a cover for an invasion. The feudal regimes in the Gulf have no interest in ordinary people, neither does NATO – over 30,000 Libyan civilians lost their lives during the British and French intervention. There has been no mention about these deaths from the Western propagandists working in the media.

The West has held a hypocritical attitude to the Assad regime. While disapproving of the anti-Zionist and pro-Hezbollah stand of Damascus, Washington had no qualms outsourcing torture victims to Syria such as the Canadian citizen Maher Arar who was kidnapped by the CIA in New York’s Kennedy airport in September 2002

(see http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0208-13.htm ).

And neither has Berlin. According to the German Foreign Policy website Syria’s apparatus used torture to prepare prisoners for interrogations by German officials: http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/57993

Of course the name of imperialism’s game is clear: first they hope to take Damascus then they foolishly believe they can take Tehran. The ground is already being well prepared for the war on Iran. The propaganda machine of the western media constantly churns out the Iranian “nuclear threat” lie, which is all so reminiscent of the claims made by Bush and Blair about Saddam Hussein’s WMD threat.

The truth is somewhat different. The US Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, was asked about Iran’s nuclear programme on Face the Nation on CBS on 8 January 2012, he replied: “Are they [the Iranians] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.” (Read David Morrison’s full article on this: http://www.david-morrison.org.uk/iran/iran-no-nuclear-p...e.htm )

But when did the US, their pals in NATO and Israel allow the truth to get in the way of a good war? There is growing speculation that Israel may launch an attack on Iran as early as April. (A MUST READ is an absorbing article by Craig Murray - former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan who was sacked because of his whistleblowing – concerning the “British Ambassador to Israel and the plot to attack Iran”: http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/11/matthew-...iran/

A military conflict with Iran will have untold consequences for the world. And as long as Shannon remains a US military base we will be accomplices to the crimes committed by the West. That is why it is vital we continue to support the peace activities of Shannonwatch and try and make Shannon warport a national issue once more.


Once more the Guardian’s Seumas Milne goes to the heart of the matter with a commentary on Syria: Intervention in Syria will escalate not stop the killing

Russia and China blocked a bid to force regime change. But a negotiated settlement is the only way out of civil war




This was the headline in a recent article in the newsletter of Defence IQ.com. If you are in the business of armaments – very, very big or really, really small armaments – then this website’s mailing list is the one you got to be on.

The article appears because the European Parliament’s specialist committee on “security and defence issues” proposed a “ground-breaking resolution” that could see European Union funds being used to plug capability gaps for the continent’s militaries.

The “Lisek Resolution” – named after its key author Polish MEP Krzysztof Lisek - came in response to a detailed report put in circulation in mid-2011 concerning “the impact of the financial crisis on European militaries.” The newsletter goes on to report – without any sense of satire – that the as yet non-binding resolution is “a sign of the increased interest in the plight (sic!!) of defence spending by European Parliamentarians.”

The People’s Movement in a detailed analysis of these developments in its latest issue of People’s News argues that “The Lisbon Treaty creeps incrementally towards implementation: http://www.people.ie/news/PN-63.pdf .

Both the “Lisek Resolution” and the Lisbon Treaty’s European Defence Agency raise the question, who has the EU to defend itself against that it needs to waste funds on armaments? The answer, of course, is nobody! ‘Defence’ is just a euphemism for war.

The “Lisek Resolution” also exposes the nonsense that increased powers for the European Parliament would mean greater democracy in the EU. It would only mean further erosion of whatever power we the Irish people have to determine our own future!



Back in the 1960s the US folksinger Tom Paxton wrote the song

“What did you learn in school today?” Here is a taste of the lyrics:

What did you learn in school today,

Dear little boy of mine?

What did you learn in school today,

Dear little boy of mine?

I learned that Washington never told a lie.

I learned that soldiers seldom die.

I learned that everybody's free.

And that's what the teacher said to me.

That's what I learned in school today.

That's what I learned in school.

( For complete lyrics: http://www.mydfz.com/Paxton/lyrics/wdylis.htm )

Flicking through a copy of Wordplay 2 – the English textbook for kids preparing for the Junior Cert in 2nd & 3rd year in Irish secondary schools– one GAAW member came across part of Obama’s inauguration speech and began to realise that Tom Paxton’s song is as relevant today in Ireland as it was back in the USA of 1963 .

The excerpt from the speech consists of the 3 paragraphs under the heading “Era of Peace”. This speech is the only one in the whole 396 pages of the English book, which underlines its apparent importance to the Dept. of Education.

The second para printed in this text book deserves special attention. It reads:

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West - know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

The Muslim world – despite all the pleasant sentiments in the first sentence – is in the same breath linked with those “who seek to sow conflict”. This is no accident. This sentence is particularly outrageous: “To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict…. know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy.” As if US governments were paragons of peace.

At first glance one might think the aim of the extract was to teach the children the meaning of “irony”. Not so. Sure “irony died” when Henry Kissinger – the warmonger and former US Secretary of State – in 1973 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Clearly those in charge of the Peace Prize were not convinced “irony” was truly dead, as they dug it up and bludgeoned it again by bestowing the peace award on President Obama.

And just to prove how worthless this award is, what did Obama do in his first week in office after his momentous speech? Well, don’t expect the authors of Wordplay 2 to tell you. He sanctioned the firing of two rockets into Pakistan, which killed 22 people, 18 of them women and children. Since then he has killed many, many more people. Indeed, he appears to have suspended Bush’s policy of “extraordinary rendition” and instead stepped up targeted killings. (see: Targeted Killings – Silent Complicity: http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/57991 )

Those killings are carried out by US Special Forces– who regularly travel through Shannon airport - and drones, which are probably also part of the military hardware that passes through our country without inspection. (see Shannonwatch’s report: http://www.shannonwatch.org/story/alarming-number-munit...-2011 )


Obama has claimed “Our drones target active terrorists.” If so, then why since Obama took office three years ago, between 282 and 535 civilians have been credibly reported as killed including more than 60 children. Rescuers and funeral attendees of the victims are now regularly targeted.

(Glen Greenwald tells the real story about those deadly drones: http://stopwar.org.uk/index.php/usa-war-on-terror/1103-...-this )

So what we have in Wordplay 2 is the views taken by the powers-that-be in Ireland that believe the ruling ideas of the USA - and the EU for that matter – should also be ours.

We shouldn’t be surprised. Didn’t an old bearded German gentleman back in the 19th century note that: “The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force.” (Source: German Ideology by K. Marx)

Pete Seeger singing What did you learn in school today? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWE6seINeoE

A newer version from Danish singer Eddie Skoller



author by opus diablos - the regressive hypocrite partypublication date Mon Feb 13, 2012 13:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

the fog of war...an alternative scope


Pentagonian mission-creeps

author by opus diablos - the regressive hypocrite partypublication date Tue Feb 14, 2012 17:06author address author phone Report this post to the editors

..dont forget your salt...but this seems balanced and credible to me. It fits the patterns


© 2001-2020 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy