A Reporter Asked Biden If He Still Think... Wed Jun 16, 2021 15:10 | Sam Clench
New Discovery Shows Human Cells Can Writ... Wed Jun 16, 2021 14:07 | Thomas Jefferson University
Canadian Journalist Summoned to Court fo... Wed Jun 16, 2021 13:06 | David Menzies
Netanyahu Is Gone, and the Israel Lobby ... Wed Jun 16, 2021 09:55 | Philip Weiss
Putin Is Meeting With Biden Only to Expl... Tue Jun 15, 2021 19:23 | Dmitri Trenin
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Peru at the Brink of Civil War? The Uprising of the Dispossessed Tue Jun 15, 2021 23:39 | amarynth
By Peter Koenig for the Saker Blog On 28 July 2021, Peru, with her 33 million inhabitants, celebrates 200 years of Independence. The People of Peru may have chosen this
Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/06/15 ? Open Thread Tue Jun 15, 2021 01:30 | Herb Swanson
2021/06/15 00:30:05Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
Empire of Clowns vs. Yellow Peril Mon Jun 14, 2021 18:21 | amarynth
Global South will be unimpressed by new B3W infrastructure scheme funded by private Western interests out for short-term profit By Pepe Escobar with permission and first posted at Asia Times
Sitrep: Here Comes China: Elephants, Finance and Trade, RCEP Mon Jun 14, 2021 15:14 | amarynth
Selections from Godfree Roberts? extensive weekly newsletter: Here Comes China. You can get it here: https://www.herecomeschina.... Further selections and editorial and geopolitical commentary by Amarynth. If you do not know
Israel must choose between civil war or regional war : Senior Lebanese Analyst Mon Jun 14, 2021 12:16 | amarynth
Original link: http://middleeastobse... Description: In a recent appearance on a political talk show, senior Lebanese political analyst Nasser Qandil said that Israel is currently going through a sensitive and
The Saker >>
Stay Sceptical. Control the Hysteria. Save Lives.
Has the Time Come For a Boston Mask Party? Tue Jun 15, 2021 13:46 | Toby Young
I have written a piece for the Mail today in which I say it's becoming clear that the only way we're going to get our freedoms back is if we take them back ? and we should start with masks. How about a Boston Mask Party?
The post Has the Time Come For a Boston Mask Party? appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.
All English Adults to Be Offered Covid Vaccine by End of the Week Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:56 | Michael Curzon
All adults in England are expected to be offered a Covid vaccine by the end of the week. The Chief Executive of NHS England hopes that two-thirds of all over-18s will be fully vaccinated by July 19th.
The post All English Adults to Be Offered Covid Vaccine by End of the Week appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.
Vaccine Safety Update Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:18 | Will Jones
The fifth of our weekly round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news from a group of medical doctors to inform the debate on vaccination.
The post Vaccine Safety Update appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.
10,000 Fewer Patients in England Started Treatment for Breast Cancer in Past Year Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:59 | Michael Curzon
Progress in reducing deaths from breast cancer has been put at risk by lockdown, with more than 10,000 fewer patients in England alone having started treated for the disease in the past year compared to the year before.
The post 10,000 Fewer Patients in England Started Treatment for Breast Cancer in Past Year appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.
Keeping Schools Open Had Only a Minor Impact on the Spread of COVID-19 in Sweden Tue Jun 15, 2021 08:40 | Noah Carl
A recent study found that keeping schools open had only a minor impact on the spread of COVID-19 in Sweden. The results suggest that "school closure is not an effective way to contain SARS-CoV-2".
The post Keeping Schools Open Had Only a Minor Impact on the Spread of COVID-19 in Sweden appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Ahead of Yalta II, Putin recommits to Russian-Chinese alliance Wed Jun 16, 2021 16:22 | en
Why a Yalta II ?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 15, 2021 09:13 | en
Yalta II: Israel without Jabotinsky's disciples Mon Jun 14, 2021 20:09 | en
Yalta II: what fate for Taiwan? Mon Jun 14, 2021 18:38 | en
Yalta II: Lebanon in the Russian zone Mon Jun 14, 2021 17:51 | en
Voltaire Network >>
Rate-Your Solicitor website closed down
crime and justice |
Thursday February 02, 2012 02:26 by Justin Morahan
Judge's criticism of the Internet
The website www.rate-your-solicitor.com. has been shut down without trace.
I was not present in court when the order was made and the following article is based on reports in the Irish Examiner and Irish Independent of 1 February and on the Wikipedia article on the Law Society of Ireland. My criticism is subject to the truth of these reports.
According to the Irish Examiner and the Irish Independent, Mr Justice Michael Peart made the order on Tuesday 31 January 2012. He granted mandatory injunctions, pending the full hearing of the action, against Mr John Gill, of Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co Clare, Ms Vogelaar, of Parklands, Westport, Co Mayo, and Dolster Inc, the website host. This was on foot of a defamation action taken by Solicitor Damien Tansey against all three defendants.
The orders required them to terminate the operation of the website. They were also ordered to remove various material posted about Mr Tansey and refrain from publishing "further defamatory material" about him. Mr Gill and Ms Vogelaar denied the claims against them.
I have been in Mr Justice Peart's court on many occasions with various people, and on all such occasions I have been impressed with what I perceived to be his sense of fairness and humanity.
I have also looked at the website in question from time to time and have noticed that comments both for and against the named solicitors were published. Allegations were made, it is true. Some of these were of a most serious nature. Outlandish and defamatory some of them, one might say, if they were not true. However, some of them were later accepted as true in the Irish Courts and a number of the solicitors who had first been named on the site were later struck off the register of solicitors by other orders of the High Court.
I am disappointed that Mr Justice Peart made an order to shut down this website. At my last viewing, it contained many complaints against numerous solicitors, even some who later became Judges. Most of these were not tested by the Courts.
I leave aside the Tansey case which, as I understand it from the reports, is still sub judice.
But how, in respect of the complaints against solicitors other than Mr Tansey, could Judge Peart determine that these complaints were untrue? Why, I wonder, was it not possible for Judge Peart to order that the material written about Mr Tansey, and only that material, be removed? Why did he shut down the whole website? Mr Tansey hardly had locus standi on behalf of all who were complained about on the website?
Of course it is wrong to publish defamatory material. But to publish fair comment has always been the right of the reporter.
According to one report, the Judge also made general comments about the internet to the effect that it has facilitated an easy, inexpensive and instant means of "allowing unscrupulous persons or ill-motivated malcontents to vent their anger and grievances against people, where their allegations are patently untrue and unreasonable". He added that damage caused could in some extreme cases lead to suicide.
The entry in Wikipedia about the Law Society of Ireland contains a paragraph with a description of the website that to me appears closer to the truth than that contained in the the stinging criticism of Judge Peart. The pertinent account is as follows:
"A special Committee of the Law Society has said it was utterly appalled at reports that some solicitors had double-charged for work done for victims of institutional abuse.
In a lecture given to students in Cork, the Master of the High Court Edmund Honohan SC advocated independent regulation of the profession saying that no spinning by the Society could disguise the systemic failure of self-regulation. He said most solicitors must now realise they had been let down, not just by a few rogue negligent solicitors, but by the Law Society itself.
A website launched in February 2006 by the Victims of the Legal Profession, www.Rate-Your-Solicitor.com has become an increasingly popular place for people to vent their frustrations with solicitors.
The Society has investigated a number of solicitors whose actions have damaged both their clients and the reputation of the profession. The most high-profile cases were those of Michael Lynn and Thomas Byrne, who were both struck off by the President of the High Court following investigation by the Society. The two Dublin solicitors, who were fined €2 million and €1 million respectively, may have cost financial institutions more than €100 million. The Law Society’s director general, Ken Murphy, has described as “incomprehensible” the length of time it has taken the Garda to investigate complaints against the two.The Law Society’s compensation fund was almost halved in value because of the number of claims against solicitors and the Law Society’s President John D Shaw said "I’d have to concede that the profession has suffered significant professional damage, but the vast majority of solicitors do their best, and I think they have been very let down by the few".The Law Society had to pay the €100,000 costs of a Supreme Court appeal it brought against two Dublin solicitors who admitted operating secret accounts to evade tax in May 2009." (Wikipedia)
Judge Peart, in his reference to the danger of suicide, did not consider the danger to the victims on the same website who, according to their accounts, have had their legal affairs messed up, their lands or property stolen, by rogue solicitors. If any of their accounts were true, and the "justice system" has failed them, and he has labelled them by implication as "unscrupulous, "malcontents" and now they have been deprived of a public forum in which "to vent their frustrations", their situations might well be considered "extreme cases". But sadly, this humane and good judge has overlooked their predicament while he expresses concern for other humans who just happen to be members of the legal profession.
How the mighty have fallen.