Upcoming Events

Mayo | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

Mayo

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Catching Covid Does Not Lower Your IQ Tue Jul 23, 2024 09:00 | Noah Carl
Headlines earlier this year proclaimed that catching Covid may knock up to 6 points off your IQ. A new study punctures this claim: there was no decline in cognitive test scores after Covid infection.
The post Catching Covid Does Not Lower Your IQ appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The BBC Has ?Fact-Checked? Labour?s Claim that Renewables are Cheaper than Fossil Fuels and Declared... Tue Jul 23, 2024 07:00 | Paul Homewood
The BBC has ?fact-checked? Labour's claim that a unit of power from a new solar or wind project is cheaper than the cost from a new gas generator and found it to be true. But it's false, says Paul Homewood.
The post The BBC Has ?Fact-Checked? Labour?s Claim that Renewables are Cheaper than Fossil Fuels and Declared it to be True. But it?s False appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Tue Jul 23, 2024 01:16 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Will Trump Ever Admit Lockdown Was a Mistake? Mon Jul 22, 2024 19:35 | Jeffrey A. Tucker
Will Trump ever admit he was wrong to back lockdown in March 2020 ? a decision that doomed America to years of crisis and sank his re-election hopes that year? Jeffrey Tucker is hopeful that truth will finally prevail.
The post Will Trump Ever Admit Lockdown Was a Mistake? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Joe Biden Out in Apparent Palace Coup Mon Jul 22, 2024 17:30 | Eugyppius
Biden's team was still obliviously tweeting his resolve to fight on hours after he had decided to step down. So was the matter taken out of his hands? It has all the signs of an opportunistic palace coup, says Eugyppius.
The post Joe Biden Out in Apparent Palace Coup appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Shell Judge: "If they are wrong compensation will be paid. Isn't that what compensates everyone?"

category mayo | environment | feature author Thursday June 09, 2005 01:42author by James R/Eoin O'Broin Report this post to the editors

"Scam alert!" sez Wag "Gas stolen from people and if gas blows the people pay the compo"

UPDATE: Thursday, Jun 9 2005: Locals Force Shell's Trucks to Back Down
excerpt A local resident was driving up a road, with no traffic mangement, at around 5.30pm today, and was obstructed by two large trucks carrying pipes to the Shell compound at Rossport. The resident was then told to reverse and make way for the trucks as the narrow roads cannot accomadate such traffic. He refused and was soon joined by 15 supporters.....read the full report (with photos)

Judge - Just because I thought it was right to give an injunction against the landowners doesn't mean I was right. A hearing will determine that.
Philbin - I want the Minister for the Marine for 2002 in court to testify whether he signed the original order or not.
Judge - You can do that at a hearing - not today.
Philbin - The plaintiff argued in seeking the injunction that the Facility was in the national interest. The government has thus facilitated a private company from getting a Compulsory Acquisition order for the company's own private gain. The Irish State will be buying this gas back from Shell at top dollar. How can this be in the national interest?
Judge - It might not be in the national interest. If they are wrong compensation will be paid. Isn't that what compensates everyone?
Philbin - Money can't fix safety.

Not so long ago on Indymedia Ireland - Maura Harrington, a local campaigner implored people to come down to the solidarity gathering in Rossport against the construction of a Shell pipeline through the area. She said that “once you see the area you will agree with us that it is not the place for a gas refinery and an unprecedented high pressure up stream pipeline." How right she was. Last weekend over two hundred people travelled to the back arse of Mayo to take part in a Reclaim The Beach celebration of resistance to Shell in the area and to attend workshops on Shell’s brutality in Nigeria, engage in walking tours of the area led by local campaigners and enter into a dialogue on how best to advance the campaign. (Reclaim the Beach Photo-Essay)

Continue reading at the 'Feature Continues" link below for an account of the recent High Court hearing on the Shell pipeline and an Indymedia interview with a couple of the local farmers who are campaigning against Shell's Plans.

Yesterday in the high court, several of the local farmers traveled to Dublin outline their opposition in the High Court to the pipe line going ahead and have an injunction against them lifted after they prevented Shell from entering their land without proper consent. From what I could make of it, the judge brushed aside concerns over health and safety, promising merely to turn them into money once an accident occurred as the following extract from the rough court report shows:

Judge - It might not be in the national interest. If they are wrong compensation will be paid. Isn't that what compensates everyone?

Philbin - Money can't fix safety.

What follows is an interview with two of the farmers refusing to grant Shell access to their land and a court report.


-----------------------------------------------------------
We’re lucky that they haven’t hanging here. If they had we’d be gone now - I wouldn’t be here for this special interview.

So Brendan, perhaps to start off you can give us some outline of your opposition to the pipeline?

Brendan: We believe that there is more gas out there than they are letting us know. If its done on shore all else will be sacrificed as regard Carrowmore Lake, the water for all Erris, all the rivers, all the roads all the whole of Ireland as regards air pollution and everything else, the whole area is going to be degraded and destroyed because at the moment its fairly pristine as regards the air, the water and the environment, ya know? So all of that hasn’t been taken into account at all as regards this on shore section of pipeline that they propose to build through Rossport. It’s never been done in the world before, because usually this type of development never passes further than half a kilometer or so from the shore line so its de-pressurized like, and the reason it’s so dangerous is you’ve a pressure of 345 bar plus an umbilical, running alongside, plus electrical control and all these other contraptions, you’re talking about five different pipes as well. And you can not get distances away from private houses, and no statutory body will take responsibility for people or the area.

Philip: I’m only 70 metres from the pipe and it should be a minimum of a quarter of a mile from the house. They won’t recognize other houses because they are not land owners, if the court got injunctions against us we wouldn’t be able to go forty metres either side of the pipe, I’d be confined in my own house, maybe even able to walk to the garden but that’s about it. I couldn’t turn left when I go out the gate, I’d have to turn right! Go four miles out of my way if it came to that.

There has already been some accidents with construction hasn’t there?

Philip: Well, it’s at a standstill now, it’ll be a week tomorrow since they had the spill in the lake.

Brendan: Last week, the bun they made on the site for the terminal and the gas in Ballinaboy, they burst and water got into the streams that lead directly to Carrowmore lake. And the fishery board brought this to the notice of Shell, and they’re stopping the peat haulage now. This is a very serious issue because Carrowmore lake is supplying water to all Erris and further more its one of the most natural and best salmon fisheries in the areas. So all that has to be protected, ya know?

Fishing and farming seems to be the main industry in the area? What have the fishers done about the pipe line?

BrendanWell, the fishermen did object to the land fall pipe out at Broadhaven Bay and there were no baseline studies as regards the fish in Broad haven Bay. But there was a study carried out by UCG on mammals, dolphins and whales and I have reason to believe that some of that report was withheld. I have seen that report myself, it’s a very valuable document and the amount of whales, dolphins and fish in the area has led the professor who started the report for Enterprise Energy back in 2001 to state that this area, the small area in Rossport and Broadhaven Bay was so valuable they should go to any length to have it protected because of the amount of different species of whales and dolphins that feed their, the different fish life in abundance, the very large concentration of mammals in this area and none of this has been taken into account.

A lot of the stuff you are saying is coming from an environmental angle, but there is another side to this isn’t there? If the pipe goes through how will it affect your ability to farm?

BrendanIf this proposed pipeline goes through, I won’t be able to farm my land, in fact I won’t be able to live in the area because they can’t give us any example of this been done in the world and the latest example would be that it should be no closer than five hundred meters and at that you’re inside the danger levels. We believe there has been no fully independent quantitative risk assessment done on this pipeline and that is one of the things we have been looking for for years. What the minister proposes to do now a very diluted version of the QRA and it’s not acceptable. This is not what the minister granted his original consent for in 2001 to Enterprise Energy.

At the entrance to the camp site over the weekend there was a sign saying “Thou Shell Not Rape Erris” referring to the exploitation of natural resources to line the pockets of a private corporation, what do you think of that?

Brendan: It’s the first time in the history of the state that a private company has been granted a compulsory acquisition order for their own benefit i.e. the Irish government have no shares in this company and they have to buy back their gas at the full market value from this company. But having said that like, if the company decided as they should and have the gas cleaned at shore and took the pipe line to shore under the Bord Gais standard, we have no problem with it, we are definitely not against the gas coming ashore as we have been accused of. We want the thing to be done right, people to be kept safe and the environment to be kept safe.

Philip, you also have a sign up outside your house with a noose hanging off it saying “Nigeria 1995, Rossport 2005” that’s quite a powerful statement, what’s the story with it?

Philip: Well, I suppose it’s only to bring the reality of Nigeria to Rossport we’re in the same situation, but we’re lucky that they haven’t hanging here. If they had we’d be gone now - I wouldn’t be here for this special interview.

Rossport is a very isolated area, one bloke I was talking to before said most people make their money from farming and fishing, while he had to travel 20 miles for work. Won’t the pipe line bring jobs? Seemingly it’ll provide “25 jobs from the neck down and two from the neck up” as some locals are putting it?

Brendan: This is the propaganda that has been put out from Shell that it’ll be of great benefit to the area as regards unemployment. In my estimation you have an asset out there that’s worth billions and if all it can provide is twenty to thirty permanent jobs there’s something wrong somewhere. It’s of no national interest to the area. Erris is the size of Louth and the whole area is going to be sacrificed for one private company, it is a total shame when the statutory bodies don’t stand up for what they’re supposed to stand up for and say “no, if we want to do it, it’ll have to be done right and off shore.”

Philip: I was talking to a fella the other day there at the security compound, I spoke to one French guy there. He said he was foreman of the fitters, and we were talking about safety and that sort of thing, and he says ‘everything is guaranteed 100%.” We know ourselves there isn’t such a guarantee. He also told me they are now working a basic eight hour day and they can’t even survive, he said since they came here four of his laborers have actually gone back to France because they weren’t getting paid at all. On a basic pay they can’t survive here, they’ve no money to send home, they’re on minimum wage. All they get free is a taxi to the airport and a flight. But they said it was fifty in the beginning, that’s dropped now. The French fella also said they’d be testing the pipe, we believed it’d be 345 bar , he said it’d be 800 bar. That means they can put the gas through at anything up to 800 bar.

There was quite a funny mix of people in Rossport last weekend for the Solidarity gathering and the Reclaim The Beach Party, how can these people support those in the locality standing up to Shell and what did ye make of the gathering?

Brendan: Its very important from my point of view that the true facts be put before the people, to contact the locals who are affected and get the true facts of how they are been affected. All we are doing at the end of the day is standing up trying to protect our families and our rights, and as residents and as Irish people under the constitution we deserve the state to defend us.

Philip: We were seven on our own, but after that weekend I can see that there is great supprt out there for us. It puts a new life on everything. I’d like to do it again. And I’ll add there wasn’t has many hairy mary’s as I thought…ya know the rough ones, the eco warriors… there was one and sure I look rougher than him! But the way things are looking today, we’ll have to call on them sooner rather than later. Physical support is what we need, and financial support we haven’t gotten bills from the solicitors yet. And the people in Rossport know it’s dangerous, but they say “we’ve signed now let it off!” I was very close myself to signing a long time ago. But I asked a question on the day yer man came to me, something about safety that I’d read in the paper. That was three years ago, I haven’t heard from him since, and I’m still waiting for an answer.

Where do you see all this going in a few Weeks?

Brendan: Having been in the high court today, before the judge it’s quite apparent that it’s going to be a long slow dragged out process.

"If they are wrong compensation will be paid. Isn't that what compensates everyone?"

Shell V's McGrath and others.

Case for mention in High Court today, Tuesday 7th June, 2005, at 11am. Presiding Judge: President of High Court Justice Finnegan.

Plaintiffs represented by Patrick Hanratty S.C.

Litigants McGrath & Corduff represented by Michael Ford S.C. while litigants Philbin & McGarry represented themselves. Litigant Muller not represented.

Rough transcript from 11:20am on. Judge - Just because I thought it was right to give an injunction Against the landowners doesn't mean I was right. A hearing will determine that.

Philbin - I want the Minister for the Marine for 2002 in court to Testify whether he signed the original order or not.

Judge - You can do that at a hearing not today.

Philbin - The plaintiff argued in seeking the injunction that the Facility was in the national interest. The government has thus facilitated a private company from getting a Compulsory Acquisition order for the companies own private gain. The Irish state will be buying this gas back from Shell at top dollar. How can this be in the national interest?

Judge - It might not be in the national interest. If they are wrong compensation will be paid. Isn't that what compensates everyone?

Philbin - Money can't fix safety.

Judge - It's not my job to determine safety. It's Mr Hanrattys to prove It is safe and yours to prove it is not. Philbin - That's why we are here. If the company had done their Homework they would know they can't put such a pipeline through a residential area.

Judge - I have to be satisfied that injunction was correct decision to make and as such want to get to the hearing as quickly as possible.

Philbin - Very well. END Mr. Brendan Philbin. START - Ms. Bríd McGarry

McGarry - Why is todays hearing not in Mayo. It is most inconvenient for us.

Judge - That's not my fault.

McGarry - There was a piece in the Times of May 10th written by Lorna Siggins stating that Shell knew then that B.P.A .were part owned by Shell. However they have stated since that they did not know until May 25th. In addition to this I want some other documents made available to me, the original QRA plus some other discoveries.

Judge - Mr. Hanratty has assured me that he will get them.

McGarry - I want to return to the point about when Shell knew the consultants were part owned by Shell. It goes without saying that the Minister should have known from the start that the British Pipeline Agency were Shell. I have the letter from Eugene Collins which proves that Shell engaged in fraudulent concealment. Shell are thus in contempt.

Judge - That is a matter for the hearing. I will not be dealing with that.

McGarry - Apart from that there is the matter of affidavits.

Judge - Affidavits are water under the bridge now.

McGarry - I am a lay litigant. I have not been furnished with 1st, 4th, 5th , 6th , 7th claim/counter claim.

Judge - I will sort that out.

McGarry - The plaintiff has yet to receive their EPA pollution licence. This is another matter which shows what a fiasco the whole thing is. Lorries are going off the road goodo in Mayo.

Judge - I am attempting to get a deadline for the receipt of all outstanding documentation. June 29th.

McGarry - Just on another point. Can the plaintiff determine Health & Safety issues before the pipeline is laid?

Judge - Safety was not the point of the injunction. If they get it Wrong you get money. That's it.

McGarry - Surely as a resident I have rights?

Judge - There are conflicting views here. The hearing will decide.

McGarry - The difference between me and the company is that the company should not have constitutional rights whereas I should.

Judge - There are incidents where rights apply to different parties.

McGarry - I want to see all documentation.

Judge - For mention again on June 29th.

***An Archive of Indymedia Ireland Features On This Issue Can Be Found Here***

Related Link: http://www.shelltosea.com
author by le ratpublication date Tue Jun 14, 2005 14:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

No chance of a report on the blockade from cork is there?

author by krossiepublication date Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors

As of 9 am this morning the Cork shell depot has been blockaded by activists at both gates - I'm sure help would be appreciated

big up Cork!

Krossie

Related Link: http://www.shelltosea.com
author by redjadepublication date Sun Jun 12, 2005 16:41author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The Sunday Times - Ireland

June 12, 2005

Farmers try to halt Mayo gas pipeline
Scott Millar
MAYO farmers have formed an unusual alliance with left-wing activists in a bid to obstruct the construction of Shell’s Corrib gas pipeline.

The landowners received training in protest tactics a month ago from the veteran demonstrators, who are also opposed to the project on environmental grounds.

Work on the pipeline, which will consist of 10 kilometres overground and another 70 kilometres offshore, had been due to start this weekend but was stopped by members of the local community. Seven farmers whose land is subject to a compulsory purchase order say they would rather go to jail than hand over their land.

They were joined by more than 70 activists who set up a temporary camp outside Erris last weekend. Willie Corduff, a local farmer who prevented construction vehicles from moving onto his land on Friday, said: “We have no choice but to oppose this. People must understand this is no normal Bord Gais pipe. This is not supposed to be on land or, if it is, it should be in desert areas. This is going to push us out of our family homes. We are not against the gas, all we want is for the terminal to be offshore. The reason Shell doesn’t want that is for more profit, but what about our safety and the environment?

more at
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1650915,00.html

author by indymedia fanpublication date Fri Jun 10, 2005 17:16author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Indymedia is not there to provide the bones of stories.

As with Shannon and as with Rossport it is very clearly breaking the news that the mainstream press is burying its head in the sand over.

For instance where the hell is the Priem Time Investigates on this one?

The juice of this story is on Indymedia, when ever the mainstream press limp along with some interest like fuckign vultures they'll lick up the work of IMC hacks and piss off to whatever media awards gets them pissed.


http://www.indymedia.ie/index.php?topic=®ion=mayo&language=

author by Edpublication date Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Gus (Comment 1) is right. Too much has been crammed into this posting and there is not sufficient background interspersed to give a sufficiently clear picture. www.shelltosea.com can provide that but it is hard to see how a newcomer could cope with the very extensive and diverse current report and then move to another site for more!!! By supply the bones of the matter on Indymedia, the meat is more likely to be relished via the links.

author by Barrypublication date Thu Jun 09, 2005 21:15author address author phone Report this post to the editors

That gas resource is the property of the Irish people . Irish people should not have to pay a foreign multinational a fortune for the privilege of accessing their own native resources and wealth .

These people in Mayo should not be facing ths multi national giant alone . This gas resource is most definitely a national issue . Its bad enough these robber bastards are plundering Africa and Iraq but at least people in those countries will fight them . In Bolivia theres a state of revolution on this issue . In Ireland theres ignorance and apathy . No politicians have made this massive theft of our resources an issue at all .

This is something that should unite all Irish people who have respect for this nation and the welfare of its people . Why dont we socialists/republicans/enviromentalists etc try and unite on this issue and oppose the theft of a major national asset by murderous thieves ?

Im going to do something about this . This is a fucking scandal .

author by Colmpublication date Thu Jun 09, 2005 20:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Very interesting to see the difference in reaction to ownership of natural gas here in Ireland and in Bolivia, where a virtual revolution is taking place around this issue (it must be admitted that there are many other issues involved in Bolivia, poverty, colonialism/apartheid included).

author by Guspublication date Thu Jun 09, 2005 05:18author email gusl36 at hotmail dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

Your title is rather subjective, might I say? It could be more attractive to potential readers around the world if you had a title like, "Farmers, public try to save Irish beach from Shell oil." Or possibly, "Irish Judge dismisses campaign to save beach from oil co., says future compensation is enough." I don't know if these above are all that good actually. My point is that too many IMC article titles, and even stories, are too self-referential and don't give us outsiders the essential Where, Who, What, When. -Solidarity.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy