Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech Sat Jul 27, 2024 19:00 | Sean Walsh
The sweeping House of Commons reforms proposed by Green MP Ellie Chowns are evidence that the Mrs Dutt-Pauker types have moved from Peter Simple's columns into public life. We're in for a bumpy ride, says Sean Walsh.
The post Green MP Proposes Sweeping Reforms to House of Commons in Maiden Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills Sat Jul 27, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
With heat pump numbers forecast to rise, the energy watchdog Ofgem has predicted that bills for those who continue using gas boilers will surge.
The post Heat Pump Refuseniks Risk £2,000 Surge in Gas Bills appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies Sat Jul 27, 2024 15:00 | David Turver
So much for Labour's pledge to cut energy bills by £300, says David Turver. Under GB Energy, our bills can only go one way, and that is up.
The post Debt-Funded GB Energy to Bet on the Costliest Electricity Generation Technologies appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? Sat Jul 27, 2024 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Awful audio, bizarre performances, embarrassing gaffes and a woke 'Last Supper' parody that has outraged Christians turned the Paris Olympics opening ceremony into a rain-soaked disaster.
The post Christians Slam Paris Opening Ceremony for Woke Parody of ?Last Supper? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams... Sat Jul 27, 2024 11:46 | Steven Tucker
The Muslim Vote wants Labour to abolish Victorian ?spiritual influence? laws that prevent religious leaders from swaying voters, but Steven Tucker argues that in cities like Leicester these laws are more vital than ever.
The post Victorian Laws Against Priests Meddling in Politics Are Now Needed More Than Ever ? To Prevent Imams Doing the Same appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Aer Lingus: Sell or bust

category national | miscellaneous | opinion/analysis author Thursday October 09, 2003 21:17author by bigbadbusinessboyauthor email b4pt at animail dot net Report this post to the editors

With Seamus Brennan due to present Aer Lingus' arguments for privitisation to the cabinet shortly it may be interesting to look back over the recent history of the company.

Since the early 1990s Aer Lingus has been grooming and preening itself in order to present the best face to corporate suitors. Since this time there has been sell-offs, redundancies, rationalisations, natural wastage and an almost unlimited number of consultants reports. These restructuring have been accompanied by trade-offs to the formerly powerful group of unions which had controlled every aspect of life in the company.
There was an employee share ownership scheme where productivity increases were traded off for company equity. There was another share ownership scheme where concessions on privitisation were traded for union ownership of a block of shares (these two deals formed the basis for the Eircom unions 15% share of the privitised company).These schemes only added to the discontent within Aer Lingus as the shares managed to drop significantly in value even before the scheme was fully up and running, then with privitisation postponed any possibility of trading in the shares became a distant dream. Another bit of paper which Aer Lingus employees ended up holding were the "letters of comfort" provided to TEAM Aer Lingus employees during the selloff to FLS and which turned out to be quite useful for wiping your arse.

A number of years into Aer lingus' "turbulent financial situation" a new chief executive, Willie Walsh, was brought in to set the company straight again and ensure that the privitisation of this "jewel in the crown of Irish semi-states" would proceed in a smooth, rewarding manner.
"Slick Wille" took to the task with some relish, formulating a strategy which would see Aer Lingus on the auction block, looking fit and trim, sometime in 2002/3. That was the plan. There was a further restrucuring of the company, debt was refinanced with aircraft sold off and leased back, "inefficient" sectors of the company were outsourced and shut down (cleaning and IT went quietly, catering and baggage handling have proven stickier) and a ban was put on recruitment of ground staff with temporary staff being used to fill the gaps during busy periods. Early retirment and redundancy packages were widely available and proved very popular with staff numbers dropping quite sharply.

The events of September 11 2001 were used to great effect within the aviation industry with government supports to Aer Lingus being used to finance one last swingeing round of cost cutting and redundancies, which proved so effective that Aer Lingus actually peaked early posting profits in early 2002 which undermined greatly the poor mouth strategy being used to force cutbacks and changes of work practice amongst flight crews, Aer Lingus' last real bedrock of union strenght and good working conditions.

With rising political support for privitisation, a looming global economic crisis and the end of the important summer tourist season Aer Lingus is now seeking to break the power of the flight attendants and soon no doubt the pilots unions to complete the makeover and restructuring of Aer Lingus into a low fares airline well suited to be "merged" with one of the global giants (possibly British Airways / American Airlines once their merger is finally approved).

This project is being made still more urgent by the fact that the new, sexy Aer Lingus is unlikely to be able to sustain the current levels of profit and indeed would be unlikely to survive even a minor readjustment in the aviation industry. Following a decade of restructuring Aer Lingus finds itself in the position of having almost no assets (aircraft which it had owned were sold and leased back, new aircraft are leased and most of its airport facilities are rented or leased from Aer Rianta) and a very expensive workforce (most remaining employees are many years from retirement but have been with Aer Lingus for many years and thus are highly salaried and costly to make redundant). These issues are compounded by the fact that Aer Lingus has no ancilliary business left and thus no alternative sources of income should there be drop in the demand for air travel currently holding them aloft.

Indeed having removed the shamrock from their livery it could be argued that from Aer Lingus' own viewpoint their brand recognition has no value, thus raising the prospect that the only asset remaining of any interest to a prospective buyer would be historic landing rights at Heathrow and JFK. In this situation then Aer Lingus would certainly be doomed as the only reason for anyone to buy the company is to asset strip landing rights and an airline without landing rights won't be going anywhere.

Over the last decade then Aer Lingus has been moved from being a large, well diversified, publically owned Irish aviation industry (for such it was) to being a small low fares airline operating in a small market and owned by a fractuious group of unions, banks and the government. Given the current state of the company and the airline industry globally then it becomes obvious that the issue is not whether Aer Lingus will cease to exist and if the employees will be made redundant but rather who will own the company when it goes bankrupt and who will pick up the tab for the workers redundancy payments, the irish taxpayer or an global corporation.

author by Iolarpublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 04:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

They were never anything but a ripoff, another bloated, incompetent, inefficient state-controlled drain on taxpayer money.

The days of these monolithic union-riddled organisations and not before time, all thanks to Ryanair and the other lo-cost airlines.

author by SeaninWatcher - Seaninistaspublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Seanin AKA Dairius McGann of Drogheda, Take a bow!

author by SFpublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 12:16author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Speech from Sinn Féin's Seán Crowe opposing needless and foolish privatisation of Aer Lingus in Leinster House yesterday. In contrast to the claims of the first posting, since 1999 Aer Lingus has steadily increased passenger numbers with the exception of 2001. It now has a passenger load factor of 80%, made a substantial profit last year and is on course to make an even bigger one this year. Far from profit peaking in 2002, first half of 2003 results show increased profit compared to the same period for the year before.

By 2005 it will have opened up 15 new routes. As I am not as eloquent as Comrade Crowe I will content myself with merely pointing out that the first posting on this thread is full of shit.




I want to make clear at the outset that while Sinn Féin will be opposing this legislation, we are not doing so because we disagree with workers owning 14.9% of the company. If that was the only purpose of the legislation before us today, we would be delighted to support it though disappointed that the Government saw fit to reward the sacrifices and hard work of Aer Lingus employees with such a relatively small share of the company they have done so much over the years to build.

Regrettably however, the Minister has put two separate and distinct issues in the same piece of legislation. One is the Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) agreed by the Government and the Aer Lingus Group of Unions and dealt with primarily in Section 7 of the Bill. The other is what can only be described as the Government’s enabling blueprint for achieving its long held objective of privatising our national airline.

As much as I would like to support the ESOP deal we must reject the Bill as it currently stands and support the motion put by Deputy Shortall. Sinn Féin remains adamantly opposed to the privatisation of Aer Lingus. This company has been built up over decades to become one of the cornerstones of the Irish economy, a company that has earned international respect for itself and for Ireland. It was founded at a time when the private sector had neither the will nor the capacity nor the courage to build such a vital strategic infrastructure. It was built up in difficult times and when it prospered it repaid the investment. It is an Irish company and should remain an Irish company.

For the last few years Aer Lingus has been under sustained attack by the kind of negative thinking that now seems to sadly dominant this Government at Cabinet level. This drive for privatisation is not motivated by concern for the workers or customers of Aer Lingus. It is another example of the blinkered viewpoint that wants to break up CIE and Aer Rianta and part privatise Dublin Bus. Opposition to public ownership of any kind now seems to be a core principle of this Government, regardless of the economic and social consequences of such actions.

A short number of years ago, economic commentators were circling Aer Lingus like vultures, predicting its imminent demise in the aftermath of the foot and mouth crisis and September 11th. Their only real concern was whether the Government would be able to get a good price for it particularly if the company was sold at rock bottom fire sale levels. We were told its collapse was inevitable, it had to be sold.

Those economic gurus didn’t of course worry about the thousands of Aer Lingus workers who stood to lose their jobs, the consequent loss of revenue in our airports or with the implications that this action would have for airport employees and the wider community in the hinterland of these airports.

Like this Government, they were concerned only with profit and what they could make out of the airline. They were ready to abandon an airline it took 70 years to build up because of one particularly disastrous bad year for airline companies.

In a short space of time it is astonishing to see just how big a turn around has been accomplished in Aer Lingus as a result of the hard work, determination and sacrifices made by its workforce. The company made a loss of €139.9 million in 2001. A year later it had been turned right around to a profit of €35.3 million in 2002. Not only has Aer Lingus survived, it is thriving, about to acquire 17 new planes for short haul routes, purchasing seven of them outright at a cost of €300 million. This will mean, if the deal is approved, 15 new routes by Summer 2005, bringing to 30 the number of new routes opened since the end of 2001.

The most recent results, for the first half of 2003 point to an operating profit of €14.3 million for the first six months against an operating loss of €12.6 million for the same period last year and passenger numbers are up since 2001. How do the stereotypes of lazy, inefficient public sector workers propagated by right wing elements in the media and Government match the reality of successful companies like Aer Lingus, and others in the public transport arena for that matter?

The Employee Share Option Plan is supposed to be the Government’s reward for the accomplishments of the men and women employed in Aer Lingus. It is little enough of a reward for such achievements. Costs have been cut by 20%; a couple of thousand workers are gone. Hard choices were taken, huge sacrifices were made. It is a pity the Government could not bring itself to properly recognise that.

There is a clear danger that if this legislation is passed the Government will use it to further its privatization agenda. That could mean the break-up of the company, the loss of thousands of jobs and the destruction of a strategic pillar of the Irish economy. Instead of being a gateway to Europe and a bridge to North America this country could become a backwater in aviation. It must not be allowed to happen.

Sections Three and Five of the Bill before us gives the Minister for Finance the power to dispose of her or her shares at any time, to sell the State’s shareholding in Aer Lingus. It is made clear that the money received in respect of any such sale will be paid into and disposed of by the Exchequer. I can’t help but wonder if this Government got its hands on that amount of money just how big a tax break would they give to big business and their wealthy friends because there is certainly little chance of it being used for public services.

Although Minister Brennan has told the Cabinet he has no plans to sell the company in the immediate short-term during the aviation downturn, this Bill leaves the way open to the likely sale in the future and has been deliberately crafted to do so. The Government remains committed to selling off this company without any regard for the disastrous long-term implications of the sale of a national strategic asset. It is nothing more than an act of ideological vandalism. What kind of short-sighted thinking argues that Aer Lingus and the Irish people to whom it belongs would be better off if the company passed into the hands of a world airline whose aim was profit and cost cutting rather than the development of Ireland?

We have seen already it in Irish Shipping, in Eircom and it is now threatening in the ESB. The lack of investment in infrastructure, the selling off and stripping of a vital national resource. Aer Lingus needs to stay in public ownership.

We need only look to the Eircom debacle to see the effects ideological privatisation can have. The company made a profit in 2003 of €357 million and paid Valentia over half a billion Euros. At the same time, Ireland is crying out for investment in broadband access. Belgium has over 48 times the broadband penetration of this state. According to the World Economic Forum we are 51st out of 82 countries in terms of broadband access behind the economic powerhouses of Guatemala and Botswana.

But instead of a state owned telecommunications company investing in broadband, we have Eircom paying hundreds of millions of Euros in profit to Valentia. The Government made a big mistake then and it seems set on making a similar mistake with Aer Lingus

It is a dangerous thing for the state to lose control over key elements of its infrastructure such as transport and telecommunications, especially to foreign companies whose only concern is their balance sheet rather than our national interest. These are dangerous times indeed and there are few Ministers more dangerous to the infrastructure of this State than the Minister for Transport with his daft plan to break up Aer Rianta, to privatise parts of the public transport system and break up CIE.

Currently trade agreements between the US and this state protect Aer Lingus from being majority owned by a foreign airline. So while a company like British Airways might not be able to buy Aer Lingus outright for the moment, if this legislation is passed the Minister could sell 49% of the company to BA, or to any other airline or investor looking for a quick profit.

Such investors will take a short-term view, the biggest profit in the shortest space of time. Are these the people Minister Brennan thinks should be running a national airline? If we sell it to another airline, then if that airline should encounter difficulties they would run Aer Lingus and any other subsidiary companies down rather than their core services and routes.

In such a circumstance we could see our national carrier reduced to the level of a feeder service while London becomes the hub of international transatlantic flights for Irish people. In short, we would have Aer Lingus run in the interests of a foreign company and not in the interests of the Irish people. And if the company remained in the hands of Irish investors, what difference would it make? We would have a company possibly purchased by a cabal of Irish tax exiles of the sort who always take such an interest in privatisation schemes. The company would be run solely for profit, theirs rather than in the strategic best interests of our island nation.

This Government wants to flog off Aer Lingus to raise money because they haven’t the guts to raise money in the normal way, by putting in place a tax system that would take the crushing burden of funding this state off the ordinary PAYE worker and put it on the companies and people who have profited off the backs of workers for decades.

I would ask the Minister to withdraw the elements of this legislation dealing with anything other than the employee share plan. Let us debate that plan on its merits, which are dubious enough considering the miserly proportion of the company the Government is willing to transfer to the employees who have done so much to turn the company around in such a short space of time. The Trade Unions and workers of Aer Lingus might have agreed to the share deal, but they certainly did not agree to the privatisation of the company.

For almost 70 years Aer Lingus has represented the Irish people in cities and countries around the world. It has made, and continues to make a massive contribution to our image abroad as an extremely valuable brand associated with Ireland. The contribution of the company to the development of tourism for example has been enormous.

For decade’s economic conditions forces hundreds of thousands of our young people to leave Ireland, creating a Diaspora that stretches right across the world. Aer Lingus has been vital in keeping our far-flung families in touch with each other. Every Christmas you can expect to see at least one RTE reporter out in Dublin Airport interviewing people coming home for Christmas from England, America, Australia and elsewhere. It is worth noting that less than a week ago Aer Lingus celebrated 45 years of service to Boston in the United States from Ireland. Through good times and through bad, through planes full of Irish people escaping the economic chaos many of the parties here helped create to planes full of investors and returning emigrants in recent years, Aer Lingus has faithfully served the Irish people.

It does not need to be privatised. It does not need third party involvement. Sinn Fein’s message to any Government planning to sell off the company, whether through an IPO, a trade sale or some other method is simple. Hands off. Aer Lingus belongs to the people of Ireland and this Government should think long and hard before betraying the people and selling off a vital national asset. Consequently we will be opposing this Bill and supporting the Labour party amendment.

author by Degeneratepublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 17:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

What's the story lads, I have to pay to see what ye are saying.
Since when was it SF/PLC?

author by Januspublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 18:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

SF have FINALLY taken control of the internet distribution of An Phoblacht. The old site www.irlnet.com/aprn should be avoided. The new site at www.anphoblacht.com is both free and the official site of the paper.

author by Degeneratepublication date Fri Oct 10, 2003 18:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thanks for the info.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy