Today we are reproducing a press release from the Socialist Party on Covid-19 with our own comments added because the Left in general along with all the opposition parties has completely swallowed the Covid-19 is a deadly pandemic narrative hook, line and sinker. On another story soon, we will address the why. In the meantime from their perspective protecting workers rights and health is the natural thing to do but they seem confused by the sudden concern by the government for people. We offer a different perspective that explains things in a more consistent way,
The scale and rapidity of job losses across the private and semi state sector arising from the necessary restrictions on commercial activity is without precedent, writes Michael O’Brien. Even compared to the Great Recession of a decade ago what took several years to unfold in terms of a steep climb in unemployment levels has been surpassed in a few weeks in the case of Covid-19.
The mood music of governments both sides of the border is one of not going down the austerity road. Such alterations in language should not be mistaken for either a sign of fundamental strength in the Irish and global economies being in evidence before Covid-19 restrictions. Nor should it be taken as a sign of any kind of genuine reappraisal of the austerity approach on the part of the main capitalist parties in Ireland, North and South, and internationally.
Indy: They are correct on that count
Rather it is a reflection both of the depth of the crisis forcing governments and the state to employ and contemplate measures to save capitalism that in “normal” times would be seen to be at odds with neo-liberal doctrines. Furthermore there is a political calculation being made by governments the world over, and Ireland included, that the working class globally will simply not acquiesce to another round of full frontal austerity hence the emphasis on government borrowing over further cuts in living standards to pay for the crisis.
Indy: No. Covid is not any more deadly than the flu. The capitalism system was already on shaky crowds. Covid is a cover to strike first and go for a controlled reset to a new regime in the world. Hence the system is willing to hand out lots of money -aka -The Covid Payment -to get people to buy into it. And it has worked. Very much like the old Bin Tax waiver which split the campaign and was removed soon after the government won. Austerity hasn't gone away. It will come back and soon as we are secured along the pathway to the new regime. Fear is the order of the day and the main tool to stop people think critically and get them to go along with whatever is suggested.
This is not to say that they won’t ultimately go down the austerity route but they will do so with trepidation. 2019 was marked by protest movements all over the world fuelled by dissatisfaction with living standards and basic democratic rights. While such movements have receded in the midst of the pandemic the factors that drove people onto the streets have not dissipated and if anything have deepened.
Indy: Austerity will be one of many assaults hitting us. They can always create that second Covid wave out of media thin air if the masses get too unruly. The SP are correct though in saying the same issues are still present. They will be worse now with tens of thousands of small business going bust and massive government borrowings to come alongside deep cuts.
Capitalism as an economic system characterised by private ownership of the economy, wage labour exploitation, production for profit and an absence of democratic and rational economic planning constantly relies on the state to promote and protect its interests while maintaining a fiction that the free market system is in essence independent of the state.
The repressive apparatus of the state, the education system, taxation policy, infrastructure and a host of other supports are primarily geared towards assisting profit maximisation.
Indy: And it is burdened globally by massive debt. Nothing was fixed since 2008. Therefore they are resetting the capitalist system itself and going to create something new. And the masses will still be screwed and very likely more so. Nobody seems to pickup on this Covid / lockdown destroy the economy thing was global.
However the economic shut down forced upon us by the coronavirus has doubly shattered the illusion that the free market system can operate independently of the state. To avert a total collapse laissez faire norms must be set aside, and replaced with overt state intervention in the forms seen in Ireland and elsewhere including income supports for private sector workers, tax and rates deferrals, control of private hospital usage and a package of €6.5 billion in soft loan facilities for businesses in the South, and similar measures in the North underwritten by the Westminster government.
Indy: See points above. It is an intentional collapse. It is designed to wipe out small business leaving large and global businesses to pick up cheap assets and more market share and they suck more money away from workers via increased taxes and government debt used to bail themselves out. A society where most of small business are gone and everything is run by very large business is basically a totalitarian state. See The Economy After the Covid Lockdown
This suite of interventions and supports, mirrored to one degree or another in other countries and the promised direction of governments in the months and years ahead amounts to a revival of a form of Keynesian economic policy; that is, an effort to prop up capitalism through the crisis in a manner that leaves the relations of production i.e. private ownership, intact post Covid-19.
Indy: Since this is a global economy reset expect alot more big changes over the next few years. Things won't being going according any standard plan and we won't be going back to normal.
Leo Varadkar in the Dáil recently said he was not hung up on whether Aer Lingus, where job and pay cuts are being sought, was publicly or privately owned. That’s a lie. There is an aversion on the part of capitalist governments to measures such as nationalisation of enterprises and sectors of the economy formerly in private hands. This is not just evidenced by the arrangement entered into with the private hospitals but also in the total failure to come up with a workable childcare solution for frontline essential workers; where instead weeks were wasted with inducements to private providers who in the end, for insurance reasons, could not buy in.
Most of all in our elder care the outgoing Fine Gael government alongside Fianna Fáil, who were responsible for it being privatised in the first place, do not want to face up to the catastrophic failures of those services being run on a for profit basis.
Indy: True. They don't actually care. Any concern for the old is just feigned concern
It is one thing to provide income support, tax deferrals and soft grants and loans to private businesses willing to accept them to keep themselves afloat through the crisis. But Debenhams, Ryanair, Aer Lingus and many other companies show that these measures are no guarantee against liquidations and significant downsizings which can only be avoided on the basis of public ownership.
Indy: Public ownership is not going to happen. If anything the consumer economy around the world along with tourism is being terminated. It may open a bit for a while, but their promised second fake wave will kill it off completely
Former Socialist Party and Solidarity TD Ruth Coppinger was ridiculed, by some, when a decade ago she correctly made the call for Dell’s operation in Limerick to be nationalised to save thousands of jobs. Those doing the ridiculing were resting on the assumption that such a demand would appear outlandish to the average person. Whatever about people’s receptiveness to the demand of public ownership of enterprises threatened with closure back then, we are in terrain now where people are ringing RTE radio’s Joe Duffy’s radio show calling for Bewley’s on Grafton Street to be nationalised!
It is not just the concept of public ownership to which capitalist governments are opposed, but also to the traditional relations of workers and bosses being altered in the form of workers’ control and management of enterprises, as the Socialist Party have called for.
Indy: At this moment we should be worried that it took less than two weeks to strip us of practically every single right we have and put us under house arrest. Not a murmur was heard from anyone in the political opposition. Nor was there any noise from that section of the population who own and run small businesses who were also silent and stood by as they saw their livelihoods (businesses) destroyed. All of this justified by a so called pandemic which if you scratch the surface can easily discover it was massively blown out of proportion and in no way justified any of the actions taken. The promise of the second Covid wave or talk of mandatory vaccines is the signal to let you know this is only beginning, not ending. You are fighting a phantom battle and oblivious to the fact that we have just all been steam-rolled over in the past 3 months
This has been a critical aspect to the demands we have raised around Debenhams where the employer has departed the scene. One of the prejudices against workers’ control and management is the notion that the expertise does not exist among workers on the factory and shop floor to run an enterprise. The reality, as shown by Debenhams, is that even when the employers refuse to “open the books”, from among the workers there can still be a solid grasp of how the enterprise operates.
The experience of recent months has led to a re-evaluation by working class people themselves of their own worth in the jobs they do and the fragility of capitalism in the face of crisis. There is genuine appreciation for workers in sectors such as healthcare, public transport, food retail, refuse collection, among others, who have had to keep working through the crisis putting their health and lives on the line.
Here and elsewhere, for example in construction, postal delivery, manufacturing and hospitality, workers have often had to take the initiative themselves to agitate for PPE, safe systems of work and closures of non-essential enterprises where bosses were primarily concerned about the bottom line.
Indy: Correct to some degree. Front line workers may have genuinely felt they were putting their life on the line but there was no real danger. It was exaggerated at least anywhere from a hundred to a thousand fold and some of the crooks in government and so-called medical advisors know this. That is probably part of the reason the government was not bothered about PPE because they knew there was no real risk.
From a health and safety aspect alone workers, via workplace trade union structures, need to be empowered in all workplaces to determine when to return to work and how the work be organised to eliminate the risk of the virus spreading. This is all the more important now as billionaires are loudly calling for a rapid unwinding of restrictions in the interests of their profit making.
The overarching demand for workers in the course of the unwinding of the Covid-19 restrictions is that there should be no going back until workers feel that it is safe to do so. The virus is a threat to human biology, but capitalism itself has further exposed itself to be a sick system that does not deserve the type of “life support” that governments want to give it – it has to go.
Indy: This would be the single worst mistake that could be made and it is to buy into keeping the Covid deadly pandemic myth going. This is exactly what the government want you to do. By keeping the central lie of this crisis alive for as long as possible it creates an environment where people do not ask hard questions. It also makes people go to great expense for no good reasons, jump through stupid and unnecessary hoops, conditions the population to continuing police state control measures, makes it easy to re-introduce new lockdowns, scares the life out of old people and encourages to stay in their homes when they should be out and about and socially interacting. It will accelerate the early death of many old people. It will distort the minds of young children subject to these intrusive, authoritarian and ultimately anti-human measures in their schools. And if we are really concerned about workers the continued insane "social" distancing measures in the tourism industry denies workers of their holidays and much needed breaks.
The virus is not a threat any more than the flu virus is. What is a threat is the lockdown and police state type social distancing which is totally futile and unnecessary. It is a threat to our very freedom and liberty. The sort of thing that people go through revolutions to fight and die for. Instead you are asking people to voluntary give it up for the most transparently spurious reasons ever.
Prediction: The government will give into every demand for "safety" and social distancing by unions in schools, universities and the civil service and anywhere unions have a presence. The Left will see this as a victory but odd that their demands were met. In the unlikely event that the great majority of people come to realize the whole thing was a hoax and they are paying dearly through continued high unemployment, tax increases and deep social cuts they may actually blame the Left for their lack of opposition and playing into the hands of the government to keep the myth going.